China enhances regulation of technology sector

International Tax Review is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Garden, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2025

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

China enhances regulation of technology sector

Sponsored by

sponsored-firms-kpmg.png
Rules have been issued about electronic issuance

Lewis Lu of KPMG sets out the key elements from China’s strategy of stepping-up its regulatory oversight of the evolving technological space.

China’s economy has been rapidly changing, with advances in the technological level of the economy and increased economic digitalisation. These trends have been further spurred along in the COVID-19 disruption period, as has been the case in other economies.

The Chinese government has recently been taking steps to upgrade the regulatory framework for this environment – many of the latest steps mirror developments in the US and Europe. The notable developments in this regard are as follows.

New anti-monopoly measures for internet platforms

On November 10 2020, China’s State Administration for Market Regulation (SAMR) released the draft anti-monopoly measures for internet platforms. These are designed to curb the dominance of the big internet firms and protect fair competition in the market. The SAMR draft measures are under public consultation until November 30.



Anti-monopoly rules are not new in China. However, this is the first time that the Chinese government has defined anti-competitive behaviours for the online economy. This includes online platforms treating customers differently based on their spending behaviour and data and forcing sellers to sell exclusively on a given platform. Under the draft measures, particular focus is put on horizontal monopoly agreements in the online platform market, which are generally designed to exclude and limit competition – businesses selling through platforms are directed by the measures to report such monopoly agreements to the authorities for investigation.



These moves, directed at China’s technology giants, have parallels with the increasing global trend for regulators to take action against big technology companies, for instance, the investigations into Amazon, Google, etc. launched by authorities in the US and Europe. This being said the Chinese government still provides extensive policy support for the development of the internet and technology sectors.

Export control law

China has also recently introduced an export control law which covers military products, nuclear equipment, and other technologies deemed important for national security. The law comes into effect on December 1 2020 and fills gaps in China’s oversight and administration over technology exports. It also reflects parallel measures adopted in the EU and US in recent times.



Compared with the draft law released in July 2020, technical information and data were also included in the scope of the final law. This means that merger and acquisition (M&A) transactions in connection with Chinese digital economy companies can now fall within the purview of the law. Also, in the technology regulation space, China continues to be actively engaged, alongside the EU, US and others, in the BEPS 2.0 process to update global tax rules for the digital era, for which blueprints were released in October. As elsewhere, Chinese businesses and public authorities are eagerly awaiting the planned finalisation of the rules in mid-2021.

Trade

In another new development, China signed the Regional Comprehensive Economic Partnership (RCEP) agreement on November 15 2020, along with 14 other Asia-Pacific countries, including Japan, South Korea, Australia, New Zealand, Brunei, Cambodia, Indonesia, Laos, Malaysia, Myanmar, the Philippines, Singapore, Thailand and Vietnam.



The RCEP is the largest free trade deal in the world, and will facilitate the ongoing integration of these economies, including in the technology and digital spaces.

 

Lewis Lu

T: +86 21 2212 3421

E: lewis.lu@kpmg.com

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

more across site & shared bottom lb ros

More from across our site

Nobody likes paperwork or paying money, but the assertion that legal accreditation doesn’t offer value to firms and clients alike is false
Ryan hopes the buyout will help it expand into Asia and the Middle East; in other news, three German finance ministers have called for a suspension of pillar two
SKAT, which was represented by Pinsent Masons, had accused Sanjay Shah and other defendants of fraudulent dividend tax refund claims
TP managers must be able to explain technical issues in simple terms, ITR’s European Transfer Pricing Forum heard
Prudential had challenged HMRC over VAT group relief; in other news, Donald Trump unveiled timber and wood tariffs, and the European Commission published a ViDA implementation strategy
Australia’s CbCR rules have ‘widespread support’ and do not put American companies at a competitive disadvantage, the FACT Coalition said
Baker McKenzie advised two of the member firms involved, while several advisers provided transaction counsel to US-based Grant Thornton Advisors
Foreign remittance requirements put additional administrative burden on Indian law firms and strain their relationship with foreign associate firms, according to practitioners
She will formally take over the leadership of the private client firm in July next year, succeeding the veteran Margaret Robertson
Turley will succeed the veteran Grant Wardell-Johnson on Wednesday, October 1
Gift this article