Switzerland: New rules on inter-cantonal tax allocation established

International Tax Review is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Garden, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2025

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Switzerland: New rules on inter-cantonal tax allocation established

Sponsored by

Sponsored_Firms_deloitte.png
The Swiss tax reform has brought in fresh changes

Daniel Stutzmann and Manuel Angehrn of Deloitte Switzerland consider how the Swiss tax reform has led Swiss cantons to move towards a ‘function-based’ tax approach.

Following the implementation of the Swiss tax reform into applicable tax law on January 1 2020 and the abolishment of the preferential tax regime, Swiss cantons have established new rules to attribute profits amongst Swiss cantons in connection with the application of benefits provided by the reform.

Based on the long-standing practice established by the Swiss Supreme Court to avoid double taxation within Switzerland based on quotas or direct allocation, the rules allow for the appropriate determination of a profit allocation in the case of multiple locations within Switzerland. This change is in connection with the benefits derived from the Swiss tax reform. Circular letter No. 34 dated January 15 2020 outlines cases and possibilities to make use of the Swiss tax reform within an inter-cantonal context. 



Depending on the approach taken by a tax payer (direct allocation by the way of permanent establishment (PE) accounts or indirect allocation by way of quotas), cantons are required to determine the taxable profit subject to cantonal and communal tax. This will be based on their tax laws and influence their ability to grant incentives, even in cases where functions are subject to a benefit which are not performed within the canton.



The rules address the change from a mere ‘legal entity’ approach of taxation towards a ‘function-based’ taxation. Furthermore, the limitation of benefit introduced as part of the Swiss tax reform and the way limitations are shared among the cantons is defined in detail. Thus, taxpayers may need to revisit their existing legal structure and assess the impact of a likely preferential combination of research and development (R&D) entities with manufacturing, sales or distribution entities and their preferred allocation approach to fully utilise potential R&D tax incentives granted by a Swiss canton, even in case the respective activities are located in a different canton. 



Considering that tax is a deductible expense in Switzerland, the changed rules require a taxpayer to have clarity on the benefits to be applied for in the tax return prior to the business year-end. Accordingly, action in advance of the year-end is highly recommended and required.



The combination of entities and functions within a single Swiss legal entity not only makes sense from a domestic perspective, but – considering the possibilities of a transition regime or the possible R&D activities in Switzerland – could allow corporations to shelter additional profit with benefits derived from Swiss R&D.





Daniel Stutzmann

T: +41 58 279 6307

E: dstutzmann@deloitte.ch



Manuel Angehrn

T: +41 58 279 7279

E: maangehrn@deloitte.ch



more across site & shared bottom lb ros

More from across our site

Luxembourg’s reform agenda continues at pace in 2025, with targeted measures for start-ups and alternative investment funds
Veteran Elizabeth Arrendale will lead the new advisory practice, which will support clients with M&A tax structuring, post-deal integration, and more
MAP cases keep increasing, and cases closed aren’t keeping pace with the number started, the OECD’s Sriram Govind also told an ITR summit
Nobody likes paperwork or paying money, but the assertion that legal accreditation doesn’t offer value to firms and clients alike is false
Ryan hopes the buyout will help it expand into Asia and the Middle East; in other news, three German finance ministers have called for a suspension of pillar two
SKAT, which was represented by Pinsent Masons, had accused Sanjay Shah and other defendants of fraudulent dividend tax refund claims
TP managers must be able to explain technical issues in simple terms, ITR’s European Transfer Pricing Forum heard
Prudential had challenged HMRC over VAT group relief; in other news, Donald Trump unveiled timber and wood tariffs, and the European Commission published a ViDA implementation strategy
Australia’s CbCR rules have ‘widespread support’ and do not put American companies at a competitive disadvantage, the FACT Coalition said
Baker McKenzie advised two of the member firms involved, while several advisers provided transaction counsel to US-based Grant Thornton Advisors
Gift this article