New Zealand: Inland Revenue proposes retrospective amendments to tax treatment of crypto-assets

International Tax Review is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Garden, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2026

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

New Zealand: Inland Revenue proposes retrospective amendments to tax treatment of crypto-assets

Sponsored by

sponsored-firms-russel-mcveagh.png
Businesses are looking at the best routes to adapt their activity with the developments

Brendan Brown and Alex Ladyman of Russell McVeagh outline how the New Zealand tax authorities are proposing to clarify aspects of the income tax and goods and services tax treatment of transactions involving crypto-assets.

The New Zealand Inland Revenue has announced proposals to exclude the supply of crypto-assets from the scope of the goods and services tax (GST) as well as from the income tax rules for financial arrangements. It is proposed that the main changes would apply retrospectively, from 1 January 2009, on the basis this would coincide with the launch of the first crypto-asset, bitcoin. The proposals are outlined in an officials' issues paper (issues paper) released in late February containing a wide range of proposed reforms, mainly to GST.

Existing rules can be difficult to apply

There are no specific rules for the income tax or GST treatment of cryptocurrency. Inland Revenue has concluded that under current GST law "the supply of a crypto-asset could be an exempt financial service [ie, an exempt supply for GST purposes], subject to 15% GST, or a zero-rated supply to a non-resident" depending on "the specific facts and features of the crypto-asset and the residency of the buyer and seller". This makes the GST consequences of using or investing in crypto-assets both uncertain and inconsistent.

The income tax rules for financial arrangements are intended to bring to tax, on an accrual basis, all income, gains, expenditure and (with limited exceptions) losses from or under a financial arrangement, even if the amount would otherwise be a capital amount. Inland Revenue's view in the issues paper is that "many security, asset, or utility tokens could be considered financial arrangements between the holder who provides money and another person who provides money or money's worth in the future". A consequence of these rules applying would be "accrual-based taxation on large unrealised gains and losses from crypto-asset values, which can be very volatile."

Proposed changes

The issues paper proposes reforms under which crypto-assets would be:

  • Excluded from the scope of GST, essentially by treating crypto-assets in the same way as money is treated for GST purposes; and 

  • Excluded from the financial arrangements rules by making crypto-assets a new type of excepted financial arrangement. 


Both proposals depend on developing a definition of "crypto-assets". The issues paper indicates that a broad definition would be developed so as to capture "nearly all the crypto-assets that are used or invested in". The definition is expected to be "broader than the definition of 'digital currency' which Australia has legislated to remove GST on certain types of crypto-assets as well as the proposed definition of 'digital payment token' which Singapore has developed for the same purpose."




The proposed exclusions would not exclude crypto-assets from other tax rules. For example:

  • The proposed GST exclusion would not apply to services related to crypto-assets, "such as mining, providing crypto-asset exchange services or providing advice, general business services or computer services"; and

  • The proposed financial arrangements rules exclusion would not exclude crypto-assets from the income tax rules that tax gains on the disposal of certain property (including gains on disposal of personal property acquired for the purpose of disposal, which would continue to be taxable).


Next steps and other crypto-asset tax issues

Inland Revenue is accepting submissions on the proposals’ issues paper until April 9 2020. While the proposals are limited to GST and the financial arrangements rules, Inland Revenue also welcomes submissions on other aspects of the tax rules that are difficult to apply to investments and transactions involving crypto-assets.



Brendan Brown

T: +64 4 819 7748

E: brendan.brown@russellmcveagh.com



Alex Ladyman

E: alex.ladyman@russellmcveagh.com

more across site & shared bottom lb ros

More from across our site

While it’s great that the OECD is alive to multinationals’ fears of being caught in a compliance trap, the ‘common understanding’ illustrates a worrying lack of readiness
Rising demand for specialist expertise has fuelled the growth in tax partner headcounts, Cain Dwyer found; in other news, Switzerland has been urged to reconsider pillar two
An OECD report on the taxation of the digital economy is expected by the end of 2026, according to the group of nations
Trophy assets are evolving from personal indulgences to structured investments, prompting family offices to prioritise tax efficiency, governance discipline, and cross-border compliance
As demand for complex, cross-border private client counsel spikes, Patrick McCormick sees opportunity in starting from scratch
As part of an exclusive global alliance, KPMG will become one of Anthropic’s ‘preferred consultants’ for private equity
In the second part of this series, the focus shifts to how taxpayers can manage ongoing risks across the lifecycle of cross-border structures
Jurisdictions have moved to ensure that multinationals are not punished for late GIR filings due to a lack of available filing portals or exchange relationships
HMRC’s push for unified tax adviser registration won’t prevent every instance of improper conduct, but it is good for taxpayers and the UK’s reputation
Elsewhere, the UAE’s tax office has issued an update on registration penalties and two firms have been busy making lateral hires
Gift this article