Luxembourg’s deadline for CbCR is fast approaching

International Tax Review is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Garden, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2025

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Luxembourg’s deadline for CbCR is fast approaching

Luxembourg bridge large

Marc Rasch, TP partner at PwC Luxembourg, provides an update on the scope of country-by-country reporting requirements as the deadline looms.

All OECD and G20 countries have committed to implementing country by country reporting (CbCR). Luxembourg, among other countries, has agreed that implementing CbCR is a key priority in addressing BEPS risks. Reporting takes place with respect to fiscal periods commencing from January 1 2016 and electronic notifications are due by March 31 2017. The time is now.  

Who falls into the scope of CbCR?

Any Luxembourg tax resident must file a notification with the Luxembourg tax authorities. Falling into the scope are:

  • Any tax resident that is part of a multinational enterprise group with a consolidated group revenue (i.e. chiffre d’affaires total consolidé) of €750 million ($815 million) or more in the preceding fiscal year (i.e. fiscal year 2015 for the first applicable year 2016); and

  • For which either a Luxembourg tax resident or other entity of the multinational enterprise group prepares consolidated financial statements, or would be required to do so if its equity interests were traded on a public securities exchange.

Yet, there are still a lot of questions on the exact scope and application of the CbCR.

For instance, does Luxembourg’s CbCR law require investment funds to file CbCR as ultimate parent entities (UPE) considering that under the accounting rules they are not included in the scope of consolidation? Similarly, for Luxembourg holding companies under private equity funds that are applying the consolidation exemption under Luxembourg GAAP and IFRS, are such entities considered as constituent entities and therefore may be considered an UPE of an MNE group and file a CbCR?

We think that no notification and filing should be required from a Luxembourg perspective. This and other questions have been addressed with the tax directorate and we hope to receive further guidance soon,” said Marc Rasch, transfer pricing partner at PwC Luxembourg.

Beware of penalties

For fiscal year ending on December 31 2016, the first deadline of notification is due by March 31 2017. Absence, incomplete or inaccurate filing of an electronic notification may result in potential penalties up to €250,000.

The notification has to be filed electronically for each Luxembourg resident separately that falls in the scope of the CbCR. Yet, the CbCR has to be filed with the ultimate parent or a surrogate parent entity, where applicable, as of December 31 2017.



By Marc Rasch, PwC Luxembourg

Marc Rasch

Marc Rasch
Transfer pricing partner, PwC

more across site & shared bottom lb ros

More from across our site

The hire of Doug Wick expands Baker McKenzie’s state and local tax practice and adds to the firm’s growing ex-IRS expertise
One year after Nuwaru joined the WTS network, leaders James Jobson and Matthew Missaghi reflect on the firm’s mission to offer mid-tier pricing but deliver top-tier results
Join ITR's Head of Research, John Harrison, for an overview of key dates, new developments, best practices, and more for next year’s research cycle
The president’s tariff regime has already caused misery for taxpayers. Losing at the Supreme Court would mean it was all for nothing
The US itself was the biggest loser of tax revenue to American multinationals’ profit shifting, the Tax Justice Network reported; in other news, firms made key tax hires
Identifying who will bear the costs and concerns around confidentiality are issues yet to be resolved, advisers say
As multinationals embed tax technology into their TP functions, a new breed of systems – built on multi-model databases – is quietly transforming intercompany pricing logic
The president described it as ‘one of the most important cases in the history of our country’; in other news, Portugal established a VAT group regime
Clients are facing increased TP audit scrutiny in Hungary. DLA Piper Hungary is therefore using AI and advanced analytics to augment its advice, the firm’s head of TP says
Simpson Thacher & Bartlett and MinterEllisonRuddWatts were among the firms that advised on the deal
Gift this article