Shome on appropriateness of retrospective approach to tax policy

International Tax Review is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Garden, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2026

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Shome on appropriateness of retrospective approach to tax policy

Parthasarathi Shome, minister of state to the Indian finance minister, has said there are instances where retrospective approaches, by tax authorities, are inappropriate. He was speaking at an international tax conference at the Confederation of Swedish Enterprise last week.

shome150.jpg

The minister was asked by Barbara Angus, of Ernst & Young in Washington, whether he thought there are instances when retrospective approaches are appropriate.

Shome replied that in instances where new evidence comes to light, a retrospective approach would be a useful tool, especially going back up to 10 years and in particular with regard to exchange of information.

Shome chaired an expert committee in 2012 which determined that retrospective application of Indian tax law should only take place in exceptional or the ‘rarest of rare’ cases. This followed the government’s insertion of retrospective amendments in last year’s Finance Bill.

The minister also said in Sweden that retrospective approaches may be able to help in some cases that cannot be solved simply with rules and ordinance.

However, he added that authorities should not try to apply retrospection in rulings by the Supreme Court and other precedents set by the judiciary if it would create a fundamental change.

more across site & shared bottom lb ros

More from across our site

As the firm embarks on a major shakeup of its EMEA partnerships, some staff will be watching nervously
The buyout of Hucke and Associates continues Ryan’s streak of firm acquisitions; in other news, a UK appeal against VAT on private school fees was dismissed
Tax teams are responding to usual client demand in the region, albeit with increased working from home flexibility, local sources indicate
A 120-plus-day delay to refunds would cost taxpayers almost $3bn in additional interest, the Cato Institute warned; plus indirect tax updates from February
The Office for Budget Responsibility’s pessimistic pillar two forecast accompanied the UK chancellor’s muted Spring Statement, dubbed ‘as dull as possible’ by one adviser
Digital tax reform is dissolving the old ‘temporal buffer’, forcing systems, institutions, and professionals to adapt as real-time reporting reshapes governance, capability, and compliance
Our first instalment features analysis of Deloitte’s landmark EMEA merger, Donald Trump’s Supreme Court tariff showdown and Venezuela’s tax evolution
While some believe it could have a positive effect on the wider advisory landscape, others argue that HMRC’s ‘red tape’ exercise won’t deter bad actors
The political optics of the US’s carve-out deal are poor, but as the Fair Tax Foundation’s Paul Monaghan writes, it preserves pillar two’s guiding ethos
The big four firm reportedly sent ‘threatening’ correspondence to Unity Advisory over its hiring of ex-PwC partners; plus tax recruitment news from the week
Gift this article