French appeals court upholds Google PE decision

International Tax Review is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Garden, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2026

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

French appeals court upholds Google PE decision

google large

Google has won its case against the French revenue service in a fresh battle to overturn a 2017 decision that rejects the claim that the company’s subsidiary has a taxable presence in France.

The multibillion-dollar search engine won another round in its fight with the French tax authorities. The court may have saved the company from flipping a bill for €1.1 billion ($1.2 billion) in back taxes.

The French administrative court of appeals upheld the July 2017 decision on Google’s tax affairs. The tax authority claimed the company had illegally dodged tax in France by routing its sales through its subsidiary in Ireland.

In an official statement, Google suggested the civil court decision confirms that its arrangements are in line with French law and the international tax system. “However, we understand it is necessary to upgrade the international taxation system,” the US company added.

Google has been selling online advertisements for years in France, but these sales are booked through Google Ireland and not the French subsidiary. The dispute is over whether or not Google Ireland has a permanent establishment (PE) in France given the company’s reach in the country.

If this were the case, the French tax authority would be entitled to claim more than a billion euros in unclaimed corporate tax and VAT from 2005 to 2010. This issue goes to the core of the debate on how to tax the high-tech sector. The story is far from over for Google.

Not only is it possible that the tax authority will pursue yet another appeal, the online platform may also face the brunt of the new digital services tax (DST). The Macron government is busy trying to turn its proposals into action and make tech companies pay more to do business in France.

The plan will apply a levy of 5% to companies with global sales of more than €750 million and at least €25 million in France itself. The scope would capture three kinds of online service, including targeted advertising, the sale of user data for advertising purposes and the provision of a platform to connect users and sellers.

The DST will be backdated to January 1 2019 and will be payable in twice-yearly installments with the first due in October this year. It is clear why this proposal has sent shivers down the spines of tax directors.

How much tax does Google pay?

Much like other US multinationals, Google has subsidiaries in low-tax jurisdictions like Bermuda, the Netherlands, Hong Kong and Singapore. Yet the company’s double Irish-Dutch sandwich structure has drawn the most scrutiny.

Despite this, Google shifted $23 billion in cash to an Irish-owned affiliate in Bermuda through its Dutch holdings company in 2017. At the time, the company stressed that its global effective rate was 26% over a 10-year period.

“Google pays corporate income tax globally, but the vast majority of our income tax is paid in the United States,” the company told the press.

The search engine was not betting on a dramatic change in fortunes. The Trump administration was rushing to get US tax reform through congress before the end of the year.

Once in force, the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (TCJA) hit the company with a one-time transition tax on accumulated foreign earnings and deferred taxes. These earnings were previously untaxed and the reform package added $9.9 billion to the company’s tax bill in the fourth quarter of 2017.

As a result, Google’s effective tax rate spiked at 53% at the end of 2017 only for it to fall to 12% in 2018. The company had an effective rate of 19% in 2016 thanks to its earnings being “realised” outside the US. However, there is little certainty in tax anymore.

“Our future effective tax rate could be adversely affected by earnings being lower than anticipated in countries that have lower statutory rates and higher than anticipated in countries that have higher statutory rates, changes in the valuation of our deferred tax assets,” the company said in its 2018 financial statement.

The Irish government has moved to dismantle the double Irish structure, though it remains functional until 2020. Many US tech companies will have to find a new way to structure their tax affairs for the coming decade. The search is on.

more across site & shared bottom lb ros

More from across our site

The new office on the fourth floor of 4 More London will span 14,230 square feet, with the potential to expand to the first and second floors
MNEs now face a shift from modelling to execution as the side‑by‑side deal forces tax teams to upgrade systems, harmonise data, and prevent costly pillar two mismatches
As recent surveys suggest a disconnect between AI adoption and employee engagement, the big four risk digging themselves into a strategic hole
Almost three-quarters of surveyed tax professionals are concerned about inaccurate AI outputs; in other news, Dentons hired a partner from CMS to lead its Belgian tax team
Long-running, high-value and complex enquiries are a significant reason for HM Revenue and Customs’s increased TP yield, experts suggest
Landmark legal updates in India have led companies to prioritise specialised tax advisers over accountants, ITR has found
Brazil’s shift to a nationwide consumption tax is more than conceptual; it fundamentally transforms municipal revenue, enforcement, and administrative disputes
While some advisers praised the ruling’s definition of a ‘voucher’ for VAT purposes, a UK partner said the case left unanswered questions
While pillar two has been enacted on paper in Brazil, companies are encountering a range of practical compliance issues, ITR has heard
Moore, founding partner of the Chicago tax boutique which bears her name, shares her career wisdom for ITR’s new Women in Tax interview series
Gift this article