Switzerland edges closer to reforming withholding taxes

International Tax Review is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Garden, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2025

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Switzerland edges closer to reforming withholding taxes

Sponsored by

Sponsored_Firms_deloitte.png
intl-updates-small.jpg

In the course of its March 8 2019 meeting, Switzerland's Federal Council took note of an expert board's report and its recommendations for reforming Swiss withholding taxes (WHTs).

The report aims to strengthen the Swiss debt capital market and securing tax compliance. It rests on two main pillars:

  1. The abolishment of WHTs on interest paid to Swiss corporate and to foreign investors; and

  2. he introduction of a paying agent model and expansion of the WHT regime to include income that Swiss resident individual investors receive from foreign investments.

The WHT regime in Switzerland currently follows the debtor principle. This sees the Swiss payer of interest or dividends deduct a WHT of 35%. This is then deposited with the Swiss Federal Tax Administration, and 65% of the net amount is then credited to the investor.

Abolishment of WHTs on interest paid to Swiss corporate and to foreign investors

Interest paid to Swiss corporate and to foreign investors will no longer be subject to the Swiss WHT. This measure would make it more attractive for investors to purchase Swiss bonds and for Swiss companies to perform cash pooling and treasury functions domestically.

Introduction of paying agent principle

For payments that fall under the paying agent system for a Swiss resident individual investor, as listed below, the Swiss paying agents (i.e. the Swiss banks), would deduct the WHT and deposit it with the Swiss Federal Tax Administration, which in principle is similar to how the US withholding agent regime works.

The following types of income fall under the paying agent system:

  • Interest from Swiss and foreign bonds;

  • Dividends from foreign stocks or similar equity instruments; and

  • Interest from domestic bank accounts.

Under the report, the following will remain subject to the debtor principle:

  • Dividends from Swiss stocks and similar equity instruments;

  • Domestic lottery wins; and

  • Domestic insurance benefits.

Indirect investments will generally be treated as direct investments. This means that their income will fall under the paying agent principle, except for the share of income allocable to dividends from Swiss stocks and similar equity instruments.

The suggestions by the expert board report addresses a long-standing backlog of reforms, and an urgent concern of capital market participants.

Many aspects of the proposal are undoubtedly appealing and support the intended objective. However, the suggested reform lacks any positive features for wealthy Swiss resident individuals who already declare all of their investments and related income.

Furthermore, the planned 35% WHT on foreign dividend and interest income, coupled with liquidity implications around year-end, would be a clear disadvantage.

more across site & shared bottom lb ros

More from across our site

MAP cases keep increasing, and cases closed aren’t keeping pace with the number started, the OECD’s Sriram Govind also told an ITR summit
Nobody likes paperwork or paying money, but the assertion that legal accreditation doesn’t offer value to firms and clients alike is false
Ryan hopes the buyout will help it expand into Asia and the Middle East; in other news, three German finance ministers have called for a suspension of pillar two
SKAT, which was represented by Pinsent Masons, had accused Sanjay Shah and other defendants of fraudulent dividend tax refund claims
TP managers must be able to explain technical issues in simple terms, ITR’s European Transfer Pricing Forum heard
Prudential had challenged HMRC over VAT group relief; in other news, Donald Trump unveiled timber and wood tariffs, and the European Commission published a ViDA implementation strategy
Australia’s CbCR rules have ‘widespread support’ and do not put American companies at a competitive disadvantage, the FACT Coalition said
Baker McKenzie advised two of the member firms involved, while several advisers provided transaction counsel to US-based Grant Thornton Advisors
Foreign remittance requirements put additional administrative burden on Indian law firms and strain their relationship with foreign associate firms, according to practitioners
She will formally take over the leadership of the private client firm in July next year, succeeding the veteran Margaret Robertson
Gift this article