Repsol sues Ecuador government over oil windfall tax

International Tax Review is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Garden, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2025

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Repsol sues Ecuador government over oil windfall tax

Spanish oil producer Repsol is the latest multinational company to take the Ecuador government to international arbitration over windfall taxes

 

Spanish oil producer Repsol is the latest multinational company to take the Ecuador government to international arbitration over windfall taxes. The company is responding to a move by the government to charge a 99% tax on all profits above a set contractual price per barrel.

Ecuador's president Rafael Correa (in Spanish) announced plans in 2007 to charge a windfall tax on all profits above this benchmark. The tax rate was originally set at a rate of 50% but at the end of the year he increased the charge to 99%. This means that nearly all profits above the benchmark go to the state.

"We have to protect the interest of our partners and shareholders," said Federico Cruz, Repsol's spokesman in Quito, to the Reuters news agency. "We hope to reach an agreement and to remove the charges immediately." Repsol has already paid $529.4 million in windfall taxes.

Earlier, several companies operating in Ecuador – including the US producers City Oriente, Murphy Oil Corporation and Burlington Resources, refused to pay the extra charge and referred the dispute to international arbitration. A clause in their contracts said that for independent resolution the oil companies could go to the World Bank's International Centre for Settlement of Investment Disputes. Repsol has now joined them.

Correa said recently that he would reject any findings by the World Bank. The companies said they would have to withdraw from the market in Ecuador – the fifth largest oil producer in South America - if their investment would become unprofitable.

At the weekend, Correa said that his government has struck a new deal with foreign oil companies which would reduce the windfall tax for one year if companies dropped their legal actions. They would pay 70% tax on all profits above the agreed benchmark price for the first year if they dropped their legal challenges.

Repsol confirmed to International Tax Review Week that its case was still going ahead. Venezuela, Bolivia and Ecuador have all redrawn contracts with oil companies to benefit from prices nearing $100 a barrel.

The government in Quito is renegotiating contracts with foreign companies to reduce their stake and to downgrade their status from joint venture partners to suppliers. Other companies renegotiating their deals with Ecuador are Petrobras (Brazil), Andes Petroleum consortium (China) and Perenco (France).

more across site & shared bottom lb ros

More from across our site

The US president also unveiled a new 50% levy on copper imports; in other news, a UK wealth tax proposal has been criticised by the Institute for Fiscal Studies
Wim Wuyts, who had been head of the specialist tax network since 2017, is moving on to a new role with WTS’s Belgian member firm
MNEs are increasingly using algorithmic tools in TP. Sahasranshu Dash argues that data ethics should therefore plug directly into the TP design process
The Institute of Chartered Accountants in England and Wales also queried whether HMRC resources could be better spent scrutinising larger entities
Grant Thornton’s Austria tax head likens his practice to an escape room, shares his football coaching ambitions, and explains why tax is cool
Awards
ITR is delighted to reveal all the shortlisted nominees for the 2025 EMEA Tax Awards
Awards
ITR is delighted to reveal all the shortlisted nominees for the 2025 Asia-Pacific Tax Awards
The fates of pillars one and two hang in the balance after the US successfully threw its weight around in G7 and Canadian negotiations
Rafael Tena tells ITR about the ‘crazy’ Mexican market, ditching the hourly rate, and refusing to grow his fledgling firm in an ‘unstructured way’
It should be easy for advisers to be transparent about costs, Brown Rudnick partner Matthew Sharp said in response to exclusive ITR in-house data
Gift this article