China: The new China-Switzerland double taxation agreement

International Tax Review is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Garden, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2026

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

China: The new China-Switzerland double taxation agreement

ho.jpg

lu.jpg

Khoonming Ho


Lewis Lu

Following the signing of a landmark free trade agreement in July 2013, China and Switzerland have signed a revised double taxation agreement and protocol (new DTA) on September 25 2013. The earliest possible effective date of the New DTA would be January 1 2014, although January 1 2015 would likely be the more realistic time frame subject to the timetable from ratification in the two countries. The new DTA introduces more favourable withholding tax treatment on dividends and royalty income. By way of comparison, the principal features of the New DTA are shown in Table 1.

Regarding capital gains, it is important to note that the new DTA limits the scope of capital gains tax exemption relief applicable on share disposals. The blanket relief on Chinese tax on gains on disposal of shares in a non-land rich Chinese tax resident enterprise (TRE) is no longer available under the new DTA. Instead, under the new DTA, China will have a right to impose a 10% tax on gains derived by a Swiss investor from the disposal of shares in a Chinese TRE if:

  • The Chinese TRE is a considered land-rich (that is more than 50% of the value of the company is derived directly or indirectly from immovable property situated in China); or

  • The Swiss investor, at any time during the twelve-month period preceding the disposal, had held directly or indirectly of at least 25% of the capital of the Chinese TRE.

In addition to the above, the new DTA expands the threshold period of a construction permanent establishment from six months to 12 months while the threshold period for a service PE has been revised to 183 days to align with other new DTAs recently concluded or re-negotiated by China.

Investors from China and Switzerland should evaluate the impact of the new DTA on their existing investment holding structure to assess whether the intended tax effectiveness would be sustainable going forward, and take into consideration the same when structuring future investments in both countries.

Table 1


Existing DTA

New DTA

Dividends

10% in all cases

5% if the beneficial owner of the dividends is a company which directly holds at least 25% of the capital of the company paying the dividends;

10% in all other cases

Exemption specifically granted to institution or fund wholly owned by that State: in the case of China, the China Investment Corporation (CIC) and the National Council for Social Security Fund

Specific limitation of benefit clause introduced (note 1)

Royalties (on licenses and rental of industrial/commercial/scientific equipment.)

10%

9%

Specific limitation of benefit clause introduced (note 1)

Note 1: The specific limitation of benefit clause is introduced to deny the beneficial tax treatment accorded under the New DTA, where the main purpose of the income recipient is to take advantage of the reduced withholding tax rate or a tax relief on capital gains derived.

Khoonming Ho (khoonming.ho@kpmg.com)

KPMG, China and Hong Kong SAR

Tel: +86 (10) 8508 7082

Lewis Lu (lewis.lu@kpmg.com)

KPMG, Central China

Tel: +86 (21) 2212 3421

more across site & shared bottom lb ros

More from across our site

But partners at the firm admit that jumping ship to the US would not be as easy as some believe
Governments are rewriting tax policy for the AI era, deploying digital taxes, tailored incentives and algorithmic enforcement that redefine where value is created
Wingrove will succeed Bill Thomas, who has served in the role since 2017; in other news, Andersen unveiled a sharp increase in revenues for 2025
Partners are divided on Italy vs PDM D’s analytical depth, evidentiary standards, and what the judgment signals for future intra-group financing cases
As GCCs increasingly become strategic hubs, multinationals face heightened risks around permanent establishment and place of effective management
While all options presented ‘drawbacks’, European Commission tax leader Wopke Hoekstra said the controversial US carve-out deal has ‘many benefits’
From tech preparations to competitiveness concerns, Tax Systems’ Russell Gammon addresses the most pressing client considerations arising from the SbS deal
Despite estimates that the US/OECD agreement will cost countries billions, the Fair Tax Foundation’s Paul Monaghan believes the deal is a ‘necessary evil’
The firm’s eye-catching UK launch is a major statement of intent, but it will face stern opposition in its quest to be the top global tax player
The postponement came after industry representatives flagged implementation issues with the registration regime; in other news, firms made key tax partner additions
Gift this article