What the Australian election means for corporate taxpayers

International Tax Review is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Garden, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2026

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

What the Australian election means for corporate taxpayers

aus.jpg

A change in government means a change in policy. Australians went to the polls on September 7 to elect a new federal government and it is clear the previous Labor government will be replaced by a coalition formed by the Liberal and National parties. Tax policy was a key division between the parties pre-election, so taxpayers should prepare for changes.

Alongside a raft of indirect tax changes including the abolition of the carbon pricing mechanism and changes to the taxation of mining companies and mining activity, the new government is set to decrease Australia’s main rate of corporation tax by 1.5 percentage points.

The 30% rate will therefore move to 28.5%, with the new levy taking effect on July 1 2015.

“At the same time as the rate reduction, the Coalition intends to introduce a new levy to help fund its paid parental leave scheme,” said Leon Mok, executive director at Baker Tilly Pitcher Partners, based in Perth. “The levy will apply to companies with taxable income in excess of A$5 million ($4.6 million) and will apply to that portion of the taxable income which exceeds $5 million.”

Another change lined up by the new government, led by Tony Abbott, will see the removal of the loss carry-back mechanism legislated for by the ousted Labor government.

“This would have granted eligible companies the ability to claim refundable tax offsets in years where they incurred tax losses and these could be offset against tax paid in prior income years up to a maximum of two years. The Coalition has announced its intention to repeal this loss carry-back mechanism,” said Mok.

The tax treatment of R&D activity is another area in which the new government could look to stamp its mark from a tax policy viewpoint.

Australia has an R&D tax incentive regime providing for either a 45% refundable tax offset or a 40% non-refundable offset for eligible R&D expenditure incurred by eligible entities.

“Before the election, the Labor government introduced draft legislation to remove the R&D tax incentive for taxpayers with annual aggregate Australian assessable income of $20 billion or more and to introduce quarterly credits for eligible taxpayers,” said Mok. “The draft legislation did not pass before the election and therefore lapsed. It is unlikely that the Coalition will proceed with these changes.”

Exploration development incentive

A new investor tax credit scheme will be welcomed by the resources sector.

“Under the arrangements, investors in junior exploration companies may be able to obtain direct tax deductions in their own tax returns for exploration expenditure by the exploration company,” said Hayden Bentley, partner at McCullough Robertson.

Ian Macfarlane MP confirmed the new government is seeking to introduce the incentive that will allow investors to deduct the expense of mining exploration against their taxable income, starting on July 1 2014.

“Our scheme will target small exploration companies by limiting eligibility to companies with no taxable income and will be capped at $100 million over the forward estimates,” said Macfarlane.

The introduction of such a scheme was Labor party policy at the 2007 election, but never materialised.

“While the industry may be cautious, the commitment to a firm start date of July 1 2014 and the announcement of a specific budget costs for the measure is significant,” said Damien Clarke, also a partner at McCullough Robertson.

Other changes to look out for

A number of other changes to the tax regime were announced in the May 2013 federal budget, and Mok explains the Coalition has reserved the right to implement some of those measures.

These measures include:

- Proposed changes to the safe harbour limit and de minimis threshold for Australia’s thin capitalisation regime. This regime operates to limit tax deductions for interest expenses and borrowing costs where debt-to-equity ratios exceed prescribed limits, particularly where there is some degree of foreign control and therefore a risk that profits may be shifted out of Australia by funding Australian operations with high levels of debt;

- Proposed changes relating to the tax treatment of non-portfolio dividends from outside Australia to limit the exemption to equity interest under Australia debt/equity rules;

- Removing the ability to deduct interest incurred to capitalise foreign subsidiaries from which exempt non-portfolio dividends are received;

- Removing the immediate deductibility of certain mineral exploration expenditure relating to mining rights and information;

- Introducing certain integrity changes to Australia’s tax consolidation regime; and

- Limiting the tax concessions available to offshore banking units (OBUs).

Another area of tax policy to keep an eye on is information exchange in conjunction with tax transparency initiatives and efforts to tackle base erosion and profit shifting (BEPS). Under the Labor government, Australia was keen to lead the way on such issues, and with the country set to take on the G20 presidency for a year from December 1, Abbott must decide if he is to continue to drive the work Australia has already been doing in these areas.

Teresa Dyson, partner at Deloitte, does not think the change in government will mean a diminished interest in driving action on a domestic and international level.

“The BEPS issue is an important one for the government, Treasury and the ATO and I suspect it will continue to receive significant support and activity notwithstanding the change in government,” said Dyson.

more across site & shared bottom lb ros

More from across our site

Germany’s dogmatic restriction of third-party investment in tax advisory firms will only serve to slow down innovation and access to justice
The Irish government has been told that it’s spending too much of its corporation tax receipts and should instead focus on running bigger surpluses; plus, the IRS is set to merge tax practitioner offices
A company risks double taxation, penalties and inquiry cost if it submits a form with anomalies under the new system, Asker Ali also tells ITR
Arindam Mitra and Robin Hart examine how aggregate TP rules clash with transaction-level customs rules, creating compliance risks and requiring granular, SKU-level pricing strategies
The scandal has come just three years after the PwC tax leaks controversy and has prompted KPMG’s Australian chief executive to resign
In the first of a two-part series on capital v revenue in R&D, Jayne Stokes explores these key concepts and where UK companies need to tread carefully
Magnus Pantzar is set to join as managing director after spending nearly a decade as EQT’s global head of tax
The OECD’s project was up for debate as Matt Williams spoke to ITR following BDO’s tax strategist survey, which uncovered increased complexity and costs among multinationals
The recent spree of firm mergers and acquisitions proves that geographic scale is the name of the game
The big four spin-off firm becomes Taxand’s second UK member; in other news, Haynes Boone launched a UK tax practice
Gift this article