Romania: Corporate income tax consolidation of permanent establishments now possible

International Tax Review is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Garden, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2025

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Romania: Corporate income tax consolidation of permanent establishments now possible

clujescu-cristina.jpg

Cristina Clujescu, EY

Until recently, a foreign legal entity that had several permanent establishments in Romania, with no distinct legal personality, was subject to corporate income tax on each of the permanent establishments separately, no consolidation being available. You might ask yourself why a foreign legal entity had to register several permanent establishments in Romania. This was because the tax authorities under whose supervision a permanent establishment was, were those in whose territorial area the permanent establishment existed.

On the other hand, Romanian legal entities that had several working points in Romania, could automatically consolidate their activities for corporate income tax purposes.

This situation was identified by the European Commission as contrary to the freedom of establishment set out in the EU treaties and a request was sent to Romania in February 2013 to review its taxation in this respect. The impossibility for a foreign legal entity to consolidate the results of all its permanent establishments in Romania could have led (and did lead) to a cash-flow disadvantage and/or higher effective taxation for the foreign legal entity.

This aspect had been discussed in various Romanian business and tax circles for several years.

Further to the above request from the Commission, the Romanian tax legislation was changed starting July 1 2013 to allow for corporate income tax consolidation of all permanent establishments a foreign legal entity would have in Romania.

Because of this change, in case a foreign legal entity had more permanent establishments in Romania, all these permanent establishments had to close their fiscal period as at June 30 2013.

Also, a lead permanent establishment had to be assigned starting with July 1 2013 to take over the responsibility to declare and pay the consolidated corporate income tax for all permanent establishments. For this purpose, the tax authorities asked that all foreign legal entities having permanent establishments in Romania perform a new registration for tax purposes, including the cases when a foreign legal entity had only one permanent establishment in Romania.

There still remain however, some additional aspects to consider. For example, application of the consolidation of the permanent establishments a foreign legal entity had in Romania even before July 1 2013. This could be tried for example for EU foreign legal entities at least starting January 1 2007 when Romania joined the EU. Also, for countries where Romania has double tax treaties with the country of the foreign legal entity, non-discrimination compared with Romanian residents could be invoked retrospectively.

It remains to be seen if taxpayers would have the interest to pursue such an opportunity, depending on certain considerations, such as:

  • The value of the tax impact;

  • The effort, fees and timeline related to such a pursuit, as it could take several years to win a case if the tax authorities do not agree from the start; and

  • Periods open for adjustments.

Cristina Clujescu (cristina.clujescu@ro.ey.com )

EY

Tel: +40 21 4024000

Website: www.ey.com

more across site & shared bottom lb ros

More from across our site

The case saw Denmark’s Supreme Court rely on OECD TP guidance, ITR has heard
Belgium’s new coalition government has gone ahead with a new exit tax regime that could land it in the courts.
Brazil’s government has not officially framed the bill as a countermeasure amid trade tensions with the US, but the move is being considered as part of Brazil’s strategic response, one expert tells ITR
Understanding India’s income tax landscape can help charities ensure compliance, optimise tax benefits, and enhance their impact, writes Raghav Bajaj of Khaitan & Co
Tax advisers in Brazil are rising above the country’s notoriously complex tax system to deliver high-quality advisory services, ITR’s exclusive in-house data reveals
ITR’s data has highlighted the US firm’s ambition to become America’s ‘premier’ tax player via a concerted partner recruitment strategy
Jaap Zwaan’s arrival continues a recent streak of A&M Tax investing in the region; in other news, the US and Japan struck a deal that significantly lowered tariff rates
In a world where international tax concepts rely on human activity, Leonard Wagenaar poses existential questions about the future of such ideas when AI is ever-present
France v Axa provides a practical illustration of how the burden of proof is applied in TP matters under French law, ITR also heard
In an exclusive interview with ITR, Ian Gary calls for a central public CbCR database and bemoans the US’s lack of involvement in international tax transparency
Gift this article