Cambodia: New tax on shares gives possible glimpse of future developments

International Tax Review is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Garden, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2025

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Cambodia: New tax on shares gives possible glimpse of future developments

oconnell.jpg

Clint O’Connell

The introduction in December 2012 of a new category of registration tax under the 2013 Financial Management Law on share transfers in Cambodian entities, gives a possible glimpse as to how the Cambodian tax authorities may deal with existing loopholes in the tax regulations regarding the taxation of shares in Cambodian entities. In particular, the Cambodian tax regime does not provide a specific income tax regime for non-resident shareholders that realise a gain on shares issued by a Cambodian company, even though capital gains on shares are, as a matter of principle, taxable income under Article 7 of the Law on Taxation:

"The taxable profit is the net profit from all the results of all types of business operations including capital gains realised during the business operation or at the close of the business."

The practical explanation as to why non-residents do not have to declare and pay tax on profit on gains derived from share transfers in a Cambodian entity is tied up with the specific operation of the Cambodian tax regime. Under the Law on Taxation, the primary way that a taxpayer can declare tax is via the submission of a tax declaration which can only be accomplished if the taxpayer is:

  1. Registered with the General Department of Taxation;

  2. Required to register by virtue of carrying out economic activity or by having a "permanent establishment" in Cambodia; or

  3. Via a third party registered taxpayer under the withholding tax regime in Cambodia.

On the face of it, a non-resident will not have a permanent establishment in Cambodia merely by holding shares in a Cambodian company. We note that at the time of writing, Cambodia has not entered into any double taxation agreements (DTA) and the concept of permanent establishment is to be found in the domestic tax regulations of Cambodia. The concept of permanent establishment as found in Cambodia's domestic tax regulations closely resembles the standard language that is to be found in most DTA's.

In addition, the withholding tax regime in Cambodia does not contemplate a withholding tax on gains that arise from the sale of shares by non-residents. As a result, no actual tax liability exists for non-residents that make a gain on selling shares in a Cambodian entity who do not have a permanent establishment in Cambodia.

Given the desire of the Cambodian tax department to increase tax revenue in the future and the additional information they will now have regarding potential lost revenue on non-resident share transfers, by virtue of the new registration tax, we believe it highly probable that this existing loophole may shortly be closed.

As per the existing withholding tax regime in Cambodia and the recently introduced 0.1% registration tax on share transfers – it would be a fairly simple process for the Cambodian tax officials to introduce a regulation that required Cambodian entities, whose shares are being transferred by a non-resident shareholder, to either withhold or be liable to pay, the resulting tax on profit that may arise on any gain that is derived in respect to the transfer.

The only questions that really remain are as to how long it will be before the tax officials in Cambodia enact this change, what will be the exact form of the change, and what, if any, notice will be given to those affected.

Clint O'Connell (clint.oconnell@vdb-loi.com)

VDB Loi

Tel: +855 23 964 430

Website: www.vdb-loi.com

more across site & shared bottom lb ros

More from across our site

As World Tax unveils its much-anticipated rankings for 2026, we focus on standout performances by PwC, KPMG and Deloitte across the Asia-Pacific region
The partnership model was looking antiquated even before the UK chancellor’s expected tax raid on LLPs was revealed. An additional tax burden may finally kill it off
The US’s GILTI regime will not be forced upon American multinationals in foreign jurisdictions, Bloomberg has reported; in other news, Ropes & Gray hired two tax partners from Linklaters
APAs should provide a pragmatic means to agree to an arm's-length outcome for an Australian entity and for the ATO, the tax authority said
Overall revenues and average profit per partner also increased in the UK, the ‘big four’ firm revealed
Increasingly complex reporting requirements contributed towards the firm’s growth in tax, it said
Sector-specific business taxes, private equity tax treatment reform and changes to the taxation of non-residents are all on the cards for the UK, authors from Herbert Smith Freehills Kramer predict
The UK’s Labour government has an unpopular prime minister, an unpopular chancellor and not a lot of good options as it prepares to deliver its autumn Budget
Awards
The firms picked up five major awards between them at a gala ceremony held at New York’s prestigious Metropolitan Club
The streaming company’s operating income was $400m below expectations following the dispute; in other news, the OECD has released updates for 25 TP country profiles
Gift this article