Hong Kong: OECD peer review update

International Tax Review is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 4 Bouverie Street, London, EC4Y 8AX

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2025

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Hong Kong: OECD peer review update

lau.jpg

bowdern.jpg

Ayesha Lau


Darren Bowdern

In October 2011 the Global Forum on Transparency and Exchange of Information for Tax Purposes (the Global Forum) released a Phase 1 peer review report on Hong Kong. The report assessed Hong Kong's tax system for information exchange against the international standards of transparency and exchange of information for tax purposes. The report concluded that a number of Hong Kong's existing comprehensive double taxation agreements (CDTAs) did not provide for an effective exchange of information (EoI) and were in some instances unduly restrictive and inconsistent with the standard. These agreements contained a domestic interest condition as a requirement for the exchange of information.

Further, the Phase 1 report indicated that whilst Hong Kong's legal and regulatory framework ensures that "accurate, adequate and reasonably current information concerning legal ownership and control of companies, partnerships and trusts is maintained in Hong Kong", there were cases involving nominees, share warrants to bearer or private express trusts / foreign trusts where improvements were required.

Accordingly, the Global Forum recommended that Hong Kong improve the above-mentioned areas. It also recommended that Hong Kong continue to update and expand its network of agreements for international exchange of information in tax matters, regardless of their form, thereby ensuring that full exchange of information is available to all its agreement partners.

In a direct response to the Global Forum's recommendations, the Hong Kong Government enacted the Inland Revenue (Amendment) (No. 2) Ordinance 2013 in July 2013 to allow Hong Kong to enter into tax information exchange agreements (TIEAs). The Ordinance also enhanced the existing EoI arrangements under a CDTA to allow information exchanged to be used for other non-tax related purposes provided such use is permitted under the laws of both jurisdictions and such use is authorised by the competent authority of the supplying party.

The legislation also expanded the Commissioner of Inland Revenue's powers to allow him to obtain tax information in a person's control as opposed to the previous position where tax information could only be obtained that was in a person's possession. It is understood that the Inland Revenue Department (IRD) will shortly issue a revised version of Departmental Interpretation and Practice Note No. 39, "Exchange of information under comprehensive double taxation agreements". These guidelines should provide further clarity on the IRD's interpretation of "control", and how the EoI procedures will apply in practice.

The practical implementation of Hong Kong's legal and regulatory framework for transparency and exchange of information will be reviewed in the forthcoming Phase 2 peer review report. Hong Kong will be assigned a rating in November 2013 when its Phase 2 Report will be adopted. Hong Kong will receive a rating for the individual elements of the international standard and an overall rating – "compliant," "largely compliant," "partially compliant" or "non-compliant". It is likely that Hong Kong will be assigned a largely compliant rating.

Finally, on a similar note, Hong Kong continues to expand its CDTA network. Most recently, Hong Kong concluded its 29th CDTA with Qatar. The CDTA between Canada and Hong Kong, signed on November 11 2012 came into effect on October 29 2013 and will have effect in Hong Kong as from April 1 2014. Subsidiary legislation has also been lodged with the Legislative Council to give effect to the CDTAs with Italy, Guernsey and Qatar.

Ayesha Lau (ayesha.lau@kpmg.com) and Darren Bowdern (darren.bowdern@kpmg.com)

KPMG

Tel: +852 2826 8028 & +852 2826 7166

Website: www.kpmg.com

more across site & shared bottom lb ros

More from across our site

E-invoicing is currently characterised by dynamism, with fragmentation acting as a key catalyst for increasing interoperability, says Aida Cavalera of the International Observatory on eInvoicing
Pillar two and the US tax system ‘could work in harmony’, Scott Levine tells ITR in an exclusive interview to mark his arrival at Baker McKenzie
Peter White, who has a tax debt of A$2 million, has been banned for five years from seeking registration with Australia’s Tax Practitioners Board (TPB)
Wopke Hoekstra’s comments followed US measures aimed against ‘unfair foreign taxes’; in other news, Grant Thornton and Holland & Knight made key tax partner hires
An Administrative Review Tribunal ruling last month in Australia v Alcoa represents a 'concerning trend' for the tax authority, one expert tells ITR
A recent decision underlines that Indian courts are more willing to look beyond just legal compliance and examine whether foreign investment structures have real business substance
Following his Liberal Party’s election victory, one source expects Mark Carney to follow the international consensus on pillar two, as experts assess the new administration
A German economics professor was reportedly ‘irritated’ by how the Finnish ministry of finance used his data
Countries that care about the fair taxation of tech multinationals and equitable global distribution of wealth should back the UN’s tax framework, writes economist Abdelmalek Riad
The cuts disproportionately affected staff in certain positions, the report also found; in other news, MHA announced the €24m acquisition of Baker Tilly South East Europe
Gift this article