New Zealand: New Zealand continues to expand and update double tax agreement network

International Tax Review is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Garden, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2026

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

New Zealand: New Zealand continues to expand and update double tax agreement network

brown.jpg

stewart.jpg

Brendan Brown


Tim Stewart

New Zealand has recently signed a double tax agreement (DTA) with Vietnam and completed the exchange of notes necessary to bring into force its revised DTA with Japan. These steps continue New Zealand's programme of expanding and updating its network of DTAs, which now extends to 39 DTAs (37 of which are in force).

New DTA with Vietnam

The DTA is New Zealand's first with Vietnam, reflecting the increasing importance of the relationship with Vietnam. The new DTA more closely follows the United Nations model than the OECD model in some respects, and so affords greater taxing rights to the source country than many of New Zealand's recent DTAs.

Thus, the business profits article provides that where an enterprise of a contracting state carries on business through a permanent establishment (PE) in the other state (the source state), the source state may tax: (a) the profits attributable to the PE; and (b) profits attributable to sales of goods or merchandise of the same or similar kind as those sold through the PE even if they are not attributable to the PE, but only if the competent authority of the source state considers that the enterprise has entered into an arrangement in relation to those sales to avoid taxation of those profits in that state.

The limits on source country tax on interest, dividends and royalties under the new DTA are:

  • Dividends: Limited to 5% of the gross dividend if the beneficial owner of the dividend is a company holding directly 50% of the voting power of the company paying the dividend. For dividends not qualifying for the 5% rate, the rate is 15%.

  • Interest: 10% of the gross amount.

  • Royalties: 10% of the gross amount.

For interest and royalties, the limitations on source country tax will not apply where the debt claim (in the case of interest) or relevant rights (in the case of royalties) are effectively connected with a PE or fixed base situated in the source country, or with activities referred to in Article 7(1)(b) (that is sales of goods or merchandise of the same or similar kind as those sold through the enterprise's PE even if they are not attributable to the PE, if the tax avoidance test in Article 7(1)(b) is satisfied). Such interest and royalty amounts therefore (in effect) form part of the PE's income, the source country tax on which is not limited by the DTA.

NZ/Japan DTA

The revised New Zealand-Japan DTA will apply to taxes withheld at source on or after January 1 2014. For New Zealand income tax it will apply for income years beginning on or after April 1 2014 and for Japanese income tax it will apply for income years beginning on or after January 1 2014.

The new DTA will replace the DTA concluded in 1963. Key changes include a reduction in the limits on source country tax:

  • Dividends: The DTA retains a source country limit of 15% for dividends but introduces a 0% rate where the beneficial owner of the dividend is a company that owns (and has owned for six months) directly or indirectly 10% of the voting power of the company paying the dividends. The 0% rate is only available if the recipient of the dividend is a company: (i) that is listed on a recognised stock exchange; (ii) that has at least 50% of its voting power owned directly or indirectly by five or fewer qualified persons; or (iii) for which competent authority approval is given.

  • Interest: Interest is exempt from source country tax if the beneficial owner is a financial institution unrelated to the payer that satisfies certain conditions (including, in the case of interest arising in New Zealand, the payment of approved issuer levy, which is a levy payable by the borrower at the rate of 2% of the interest paid). For other interest, source country tax is limited to 10%.

  • Royalties: Source country tax is limited to 5% of a gross royalty amount.

Other developments

New Zealand is negotiating DTAs with Luxembourg and the UK, and protocols with Austria, Belgium, Netherlands and India. In addition, New Zealand has recently concluded a revised DTA with Canada, a DTA with Papua New Guinea, and a protocol with Belgium, which have yet to come into force. The next year or so will therefore likely see further developments in New Zealand's DTA network.

Brendan Brown (brendan.brown@russellmcveagh.com)

Tel: +64 4 819 7748 Fax: +64 4 463 4503

Tim Stewart (tim.stewart@russellmcveagh.com)

Tel: +64 4 819 7527 Fax: +64 4 463 4503


Russell McVeagh

Website: www.russellmcveagh.com

more across site & shared bottom lb ros

More from across our site

In looking at the impact of taxation, money won't always be all there is to it
Australia’s Tax Practitioners Board is set to kick off 2026 with a new secretary to head the administrative side of its regulatory activities.
Ireland’s Department of Finance reported increased income tax, VAT and corporation tax receipts from 2024; in other news, it’s understood that HSBC has agreed to pay the French treasury to settle a tax investigation
The Australian Taxation Office believes the Swedish furniture company has used TP to evade paying tax it owes
Supermarket chain Morrisons is facing a £17 million ($23 million) tax bill; in other news, Donald Trump has cut proposed tariffs
The controversial deal will allow US-parented groups to be carved out from key aspects of pillar two
Awards
ITR invites tax firms, in-house teams, and tax professionals to make submissions for the 2027 World Tax rankings and the 2026 ITR Tax Awards globally
Pillar two was ‘weakened’ when it altered from a multinational convention agreement to simply national domestic law, Federico Bertocchi also argued
Imposing the tax on virtual assets is a measure that appears to have no legal, economic or statistical basis, one expert told ITR
The EU has seemingly capitulated to the US’s ‘side-by-side’ demands. This may be a win for the US, but the uncertainty has only just begun for pillar two
Gift this article