Netherlands

International Tax Review is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Garden, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2025

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Netherlands

Frank Herreveld

herreveld.jpg

 

Deloitte Netherlands

Wilhelminakade 1

Rotterdam 55-001-8 3072 AP

Netherlands

Tel: +31 882881443

Email: fherreveld@deloitte.nl

Frank Herreveld is a Deloitte Netherlands partner, leader of the tax controversy management team and co-leader of the tax litigation team.

Before joining Deloitte in 2001 Frank was an international partner at Baker & McKenzie in Amsterdam where he led the tax litigation team. Before that he worked as a tax inspector and at the Supreme Court in the Netherlands.

Frank focuses on corporate income tax, revenue audits, disputes and tax litigation. Recent engagements include matters relative to international finance structuring, legal obligations of taxpayers and deductibility of costs, among others. Frank has also been involved in several opinions on financing structures and formal tax issues. Frank serves major multinational organisations as well as shipping companies and law firms.

Frank is a member of the editorial board of the Weekblad Fiscaal Recht and has published several articles on litigation. He is chairman of the NOB courses on litigation, assistant professor at the University Leiden, and is a regular speaker at seminars and in round tables with judges and tax inspectors.

Frank earned an LLM in taxation from Leiden University (1976-1981).

deloitte.jpg



Stef van Weeghel

van-weeghel.jpg

 

PwC

Thomas R Malthusstreet 5

1066 JR, Amsterdam

The Netherlands

Tel: +31 88 792 6763

Email: stef.van.weeghel@nl.pwc.com

Website: pwc.com/taxcontroversy

Stef van Weeghel is a tax partner with PwC in the Netherlands, where he chairs the AEX-Midkap Group, and he is PwC's tax controversy and dispute resolution network leader for the Netherlands. Stef is also professor of international tax law at the Amsterdam Centre for Tax Law at the University of Amsterdam.

Stef's practice includes international tax planning and structuring, strategic tax advice, tax controversy, financial instruments, capital markets and M&A. He is involved in major international transactions, structuring and tax controversy/litigation. He regularly renders advice and second opinions to clients and to other advisers, on corporate income tax and tax treaty matters and is also consulted by the Dutch government on a regular basis. On several occasions he has acted as an expert witness in tax matters before Dutch and foreign courts.

Stef graduated from the University of Leiden in business law (1983) and tax law (1987) and obtained an LLM in Taxation from New York University (1990). In 1997 he received a doctorate in law from the University of Amsterdam; his PhD thesis looked at improper use of tax treaties.

In 2000, he was appointed a tenured professor of international tax law at the same university. He has authored and co-authored several books and numerous articles on Dutch and international taxation. He has lectured extensively in the Netherlands and internationally.

Before joining PwC, Stef was a partner at Linklaters (2007-2009) and a partner at Stibbe (1992-2007) where his roles included membership of the executive committee, head of tax and resident partner in the New York office.

He is chair of the Dutch branch of the International Fiscal Association, member and future chair of IFA's Permanent Scientific Committee and chair of the board of trustees of the International Bureau for Fiscal Documentation. In 2000, Stef was a member of the Van Rooy-Committee that advised the Dutch government on corporate income tax reform. In 2009 he was appointed by the Minister and Secretary of Finance as chair of the Study Group Tax System, a committee that advised the Dutch government on comprehensive tax reform.

pwc.jpg



Arnaud Booij

Spigt Litigators

Guido de Bont

De Bont Advocaten

Fred de Hosson

Baker & McKenzie

Paul Halprin

Baker & McKenzie

Maartje Hamer

EY

Roel Kerckhoffs

Hertoghs Advocaten

Xandra Kleine-van Dijk

Tax-Insight

Ivo Kuipers

Atlas tax lawyers

Machiel Lambooij

Freshfields Bruckhaus Deringer

Charles Langereis

Spigt Litigators

Alex Mackaaij

CMS Derks Star Busmann

Marten Mees

Loyens & Loeff

Martien Pelinck

Loyens & Loeff

Erik Scheer

Baker & McKenzie

Frans Sijbers

Wladimirov Lawyers

Marc Temme

KPMG Meijburg & Co

Maarten van der Lande

Baker & McKenzie

Job van der Pol

Freshfields Bruckhaus Deringer

Arjo van Eijsden

EY

Peter van Hagen

Hertoghs Advocaten

Monique van Herksen

EY

Loek van Kalmthout

Loyens & Loeff

more across site & shared bottom lb ros

More from across our site

The climbdowns pave the way for a side-by-side deal to be concluded this week, as per the US Treasury secretary’s expectation; in other news, Taft added a 10-partner tax team
A vote to be held in 2026 could create Hogan Lovells Cadwalader, a $3.6bn giant with 3,100 lawyers across the Americas, EMEA and Asia Pacific
Foreign companies operating in Libya face source-based taxation even without a local presence. Multinationals must understand compliance obligations, withholding risks, and treaty relief to avoid costly surprises
Hotel La Tour had argued that VAT should be recoverable as a result of proceeds being used for a taxable business activity
Tax professionals are still going to be needed, but AI will make it easier than starting from zero, EY’s global tax disputes leader Luis Coronado tells ITR
AI and assisting clients with navigating global tax reform contributed to the uptick in turnover, the firm said
In a post on X, Scott Bessent urged dissenting countries to the US/OECD side-by-side arrangement to ‘join the consensus’ to get a deal over the line
A new transatlantic firm under the name of Winston Taylor is expected to go live in May 2026 with more than 1,400 lawyers and 20 offices
As ITR’s exclusive data uncovers in-house dissatisfaction with case management, advisers cite Italy’s arcane tax rules
The new guidance is not meant to reflect a substantial change to UK law, but the requirement that tax advice is ‘likely to be correct’ imposes unrealistic expectations
Gift this article