Australia: The time to pay your corporate tax is changing

International Tax Review is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Garden, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2026

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Australia: The time to pay your corporate tax is changing

aus.jpg

Companies must prepare for changes to the corporate tax payment deadline in Australia because of government reforms.

The move aims to align the payment of corporate tax by large companies with their GST payments.

The government said, in an announcement on October 22, the total tax paid by companies will stay the same but, from January 1 2014, companies with revenue of more than A$1 billion ($1.04 billion) (about 350 companies) will have to make their Pay As You Go (PAYG) corporate tax payments every month instead of every quarter.

Companies with turnover of $100 million or more (about 2500 in total) will do the same from January 1 2015 and around 10,500 companies, those with turnover of $20 million or more, will have another year after that to prepare before they start paying monthly from January 1 2016.

“This reform will make the tax system more responsive, efficient, and consistent by better matching tax collections with the economic conditions faced by business,” said Wayne Swan, Australia’s Deputy Prime Minister and Treasurer, and David Bradbury, the Minister Assisting for Deregulation. “Affected companies will pay smaller tax instalments immediately following months when business is down, and larger instalments when business is strong. It will also align company tax instalments with GST payments to streamline companies' payment cycles.”

Streamlining

The streamlining will occur because most companies have to pay their income tax in four quarterly PAYG company tax instalments, but most large companies are generally required to pay GST in monthly payments.

“This change continues the reform of the company tax instalment system that began in the late 1980s and complements other initiatives the government has announced to address timing disparities in the tax system, such as loss carry-back, which allows businesses to use losses more flexibly, as well as more timely access to the Research and Development Refundable Tax Offset,” the announcement added.

The government said it would be happy to discuss other reforms to the calculation of PAYG instalments to avoid overpayment or underpayment. It said it wanted to make sure that sums paid during the year are as close as possible to the final tax liability.

A consultation paper will be released in early 2013.

more across site & shared bottom lb ros

More from across our site

New research, which suggests LLMs can silently corrupt complex documents, should alert tax and legal teams relying on AI to handle iterative drafting and compliance workflows
Maintaining increased funding for HMRC is a ‘high possibility’ if he becomes PM, ITR has also heard
Awards
ITR is delighted to reveal all the shortlisted nominees for the 2026 Europe Tax Awards
The firm has hired a team of private client lawyers from Withers to launch in New York and Connecticut, though ITR analysis suggests it faces stiff competition
The ability of tax authorities to receive and analyse data is becoming ‘quite advanced’, warns Stuart Lang, head of EY’s compliance co-sourcing solution
The Court of Appeal ruling clarifies that treaty benefits are not abusive where transactions are commercially driven, providing greater certainty on “main purpose” anti-avoidance tests
Despite the Netherlands featuring an unusual concentration of World Tax-ranked technology-led providers, sources believe there’s a long way to go to challenge the established players
Ethics seems to be playing a subservient role to an entitlement culture borne out of a pervasive ‘revenue at all costs’ mentality at the big four
Historical World Tax data suggests the ‘largest law firm merger in history’ may not pose a serious threat to the world's leading tax practices
The repeal of Libya’s statute of limitations and tougher enforcement leave taxpayers navigating a high-stakes choice between conciliation and litigation
Gift this article