China: Clarification on non-resident enterprises electing for special tax treatment of Chinese equity interest transfers

International Tax Review is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Garden, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2025

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

China: Clarification on non-resident enterprises electing for special tax treatment of Chinese equity interest transfers

ho.jpg

lu.jpg

Khoonming Ho


Lewis Lu

The State Administration of Taxation issued Announcement 72 on December 12 2013 to provide more specific guidance on the recordal filing requirement for special tax treatment of certain cross-border corporate re-organisation involving Chinese equity interest transfers. Under the corporate income tax (CIT) regime, cross-border re-organisations satisfying a specific set of criteria may qualify for special tax treatment in the form of the deferral of CIT for gains derived, if any. Announcement 72 deals with two types of qualifying transfer by non-resident enterprises specified in previous Circular 59 if specific conditions are met:

  • Type one foreign-to-foreign transfer: Transfer by a non-resident enterprise of its shareholdings in a Chinese entity to its wholly-owned (100%) subsidiary (another non-resident enterprise) may qualify for the special tax treatment provided that the WHT rate applicable to the gain on the future disposal of such shareholdings is not reduced, and that the non-resident transferor makes a written promise to the tax authorities that it will not dispose of its interest in the non-resident transferee within three years of the re-organisation. Announcement 72 further clarifies that an equity transfer of Chinese entity resulting from an offshore merger or de-merger of its non-resident enterprise shareholders shall fall within the scope of the Type 1 qualifying transfer.

  • Type two foreign-to-China transfer: Transfer by a non-resident enterprise of its shareholdings in a Chinese entity to its wholly-owned (100%) Chinese subsidiary (Chinese tax resident).

Announcement 72 also stipulates that subsequent to a type one qualifying transfer where specific tax treatment has been elected, the retained earnings of the Chinese entity accumulated before being transferred shall not be entitled to any reduction in dividend withholding tax (WHT) rate as accorded under the relevant tax treaty between China and the transferee's (that is the new shareholder's) jurisdiction if dividend is distributed after the transaction. This measure is designed to prevent any conferment of dividend WHT advantages that may be derived from a qualifying restructuring and codifies what tax authorities sometimes require in practice.

Another noteworthy point is that Announcement 72 removes the requirement stipulated in previous Circular 698 that the application for special tax treatment be approved by the local tax authorities at the provincial level. The approval requirement has been replaced by a recordal filing procedure. Such recordal filing shall be completed within 30 days from the effective date of equity transfer agreement and upon completion of the requisite government approval procedures for changing of shareholder.

Foreign investors should monitor further guidance on the above, and carefully evaluate the potential tax implications and exposure of any cross-border intra-group re-organisation before actual implementation.

Khoonming Ho (khoonming.ho@kpmg.com)

KPMG, China and Hong Kong SAR

Tel: +86 (10) 8508 7082

Lewis Lu (lewis.lu@kpmg.com)

KPMG, Central China

Tel: +86 (21) 2212 3421

more across site & shared bottom lb ros

More from across our site

Luxembourg’s reform agenda continues at pace in 2025, with targeted measures for start-ups and alternative investment funds
Veteran Elizabeth Arrendale will lead the new advisory practice, which will support clients with M&A tax structuring, post-deal integration, and more
MAP cases keep increasing, and cases closed aren’t keeping pace with the number started, the OECD’s Sriram Govind also told an ITR summit
Nobody likes paperwork or paying money, but the assertion that legal accreditation doesn’t offer value to firms and clients alike is false
Ryan hopes the buyout will help it expand into Asia and the Middle East; in other news, three German finance ministers have called for a suspension of pillar two
SKAT, which was represented by Pinsent Masons, had accused Sanjay Shah and other defendants of fraudulent dividend tax refund claims
TP managers must be able to explain technical issues in simple terms, ITR’s European Transfer Pricing Forum heard
Prudential had challenged HMRC over VAT group relief; in other news, Donald Trump unveiled timber and wood tariffs, and the European Commission published a ViDA implementation strategy
Australia’s CbCR rules have ‘widespread support’ and do not put American companies at a competitive disadvantage, the FACT Coalition said
Baker McKenzie advised two of the member firms involved, while several advisers provided transaction counsel to US-based Grant Thornton Advisors
Gift this article