Japan still wants corporate tax reduction

International Tax Review is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Garden, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2025

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Japan still wants corporate tax reduction

japan.jpg

Yasutoshi Nishimura, Japan’s Deputy Economy Minister, is the latest government figure to join the calls for a corporate tax rate reduction.

The Shinzo Abe cabinet has already approved a reform plan that would end the 2011 special corporate tax surcharge in March this year – a year ahead of schedule.

This will see the country’s tax on corporate profits drop from 38% to 35.6%, but Nishimura and others want to see it cut further. Nishimura has called for the corporate tax rate to be cut to less than 30% to boost Japan’s competitiveness in the global market.

“I’d like to see deeper corporate tax cuts in the special economic zones,” said Nishimura.

The government is loosening regulations on companies operating in such zones, and a lower corporate tax rate for these regions could be another measure introduced.

“I want to show the direction of special zone tax reductions,” said Nishimura, who repeated his preference for a move to 30% before implementing further reductions down the line.

Revenue neutral approach possible

Akihiro Hironaka, partner at Nishimura & Asahi, points out that removing certain tax preferences that he considers give unequal treatment to different taxpayers, would harvest sufficient revenue to cut the corporate tax rate.

“It appears to me that many outdated special taxation measures, which are more generous to manufacturers than to service providers and retailers, should be abolished, as it is problematic in terms of equal treatment to taxpayers,” said Hironaka. “If the government abolishes these special taxation measures, it will generate substantial government revenues which enable the government to make corporate tax reductions.”

However, achieving the repeal of such provisions may be tougher than expected, due to the likelihood of intense lobbying efforts from those presently benefitting from the measures.

“It will not be easy because industry sectors that have benefited from these special taxation measures will resist strongly,” said Hironaka.

more across site & shared bottom lb ros

More from across our site

The reduction would still ‘leave room’ for pillar two and further reductions would be possible, one expert tells ITR
Funding from private equity house EQT will propel WTS Germany to compete with the ‘big four’, the firm’s leaders told ITR in an extensive interview
New Zealand is bucking the trend of its international counterparts with its investment-friendly visa approach. Here’s what high-net-worth investors need to know
However, nearly 10% of reports only disclosed activities in tax havens, according to the Fair Tax Foundation; in other news, Plante Moran sealed a US east coast merger
While pillar one is still alive, it will apply to a smaller group of companies, Brian Foley also told ITR
Tax teams that centralise and automate their pillar two data will have a much easier time during reporting season, says Hank Moonen, CEO of TaxModel
While GCCs drive efficiency for multinationals, they also present a host of TP risks that should be considered carefully
PwC Ireland has also called for simplifying Ireland’s tax code and a reduction in its capital gains tax in a pre-budget submission
Effective audit management requires more than documentation; it’s the way taxpayers engage that can shape audit direction, manage procedural ambiguity, and preserve options for appeal or litigation
American advisers are falling short of client expectations when it comes to providing value-added services, but remaining tight-lipped won’t make the problem go away
Gift this article