Japan still wants corporate tax reduction

International Tax Review is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Garden, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2026

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Japan still wants corporate tax reduction

japan.jpg

Yasutoshi Nishimura, Japan’s Deputy Economy Minister, is the latest government figure to join the calls for a corporate tax rate reduction.

The Shinzo Abe cabinet has already approved a reform plan that would end the 2011 special corporate tax surcharge in March this year – a year ahead of schedule.

This will see the country’s tax on corporate profits drop from 38% to 35.6%, but Nishimura and others want to see it cut further. Nishimura has called for the corporate tax rate to be cut to less than 30% to boost Japan’s competitiveness in the global market.

“I’d like to see deeper corporate tax cuts in the special economic zones,” said Nishimura.

The government is loosening regulations on companies operating in such zones, and a lower corporate tax rate for these regions could be another measure introduced.

“I want to show the direction of special zone tax reductions,” said Nishimura, who repeated his preference for a move to 30% before implementing further reductions down the line.

Revenue neutral approach possible

Akihiro Hironaka, partner at Nishimura & Asahi, points out that removing certain tax preferences that he considers give unequal treatment to different taxpayers, would harvest sufficient revenue to cut the corporate tax rate.

“It appears to me that many outdated special taxation measures, which are more generous to manufacturers than to service providers and retailers, should be abolished, as it is problematic in terms of equal treatment to taxpayers,” said Hironaka. “If the government abolishes these special taxation measures, it will generate substantial government revenues which enable the government to make corporate tax reductions.”

However, achieving the repeal of such provisions may be tougher than expected, due to the likelihood of intense lobbying efforts from those presently benefitting from the measures.

“It will not be easy because industry sectors that have benefited from these special taxation measures will resist strongly,” said Hironaka.

more across site & shared bottom lb ros

More from across our site

The controversial deal will allow US-parented groups to be carved out from key aspects of pillar two
Awards
ITR invites tax firms, in-house teams, and tax professionals to make submissions for the 2027 World Tax rankings and the 2026 ITR Tax Awards globally
Pillar two was ‘weakened’ when it altered from a multinational convention agreement to simply national domestic law, Federico Bertocchi also argued
Imposing the tax on virtual assets is a measure that appears to have no legal, economic or statistical basis, one expert told ITR
The EU has seemingly capitulated to the US’s ‘side-by-side’ demands. This may be a win for the US, but the uncertainty has only just begun for pillar two
The £7.4m buyout marks MHA’s latest acquisition since listing on the London Stock Exchange earlier this year
ITR’s most prolific stories of the year charted public pillar two spats, the continued fallout from the PwC Australia tax leaks scandal, and a headline tax fraud trial
The climbdowns pave the way for a side-by-side deal to be concluded this week, as per the US Treasury secretary’s expectation; in other news, Taft added a 10-partner tax team
A vote to be held in 2026 could create Hogan Lovells Cadwalader, a $3.6bn giant with 3,100 lawyers across the Americas, EMEA and Asia Pacific
Foreign companies operating in Libya face source-based taxation even without a local presence. Multinationals must understand compliance obligations, withholding risks, and treaty relief to avoid costly surprises
Gift this article