Poland: Amendments to transfer pricing regulations from January 2015

International Tax Review is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Garden, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2026

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Poland: Amendments to transfer pricing regulations from January 2015

dluska.jpg

zurawicki.jpg

Renata Dluska


Arkadiusz Zurawicki

A legislative act dated August 29 2014 (Journal of Laws from 2014, Item 1328) introduces – from January 1 2015 – changes to transfer pricing regulations in Corporate Income Tax Act (CIT Act) and Personal Income Tax Act. Key changes include:

  1. the list of related entities expanded to include partnerships;

  2. new types of transactions/agreements being covered by transfer pricing documentation requirements;

  3. permanent establishments (PEs) also being covered by transfer pricing documentation requirement; and

  4. a possibility to make tax return corrections due to a transfer pricing adjustment of domestic transactions/agreements.

List of related entities expanded to include partnerships

Starting January 1 2015 the definition of related party will cover entities which do not have a legal personality. For taxpayers it means that as of January 1 2015 a partnership must apply the arm's-length principle in any transaction with related parties and must prepare transfer pricing documentation.

New types of transactions/agreements will be covered by transfer pricing documentation requirement

Changes to transfer pricing regulations also impose an obligation to prepare transfer pricing documentation on taxpayers entering into:

  • partnership agreements;

  • joint venture agreements; and/or

  • contracts of a similar nature.

In these cases the requirement to prepare transfer pricing documentation applies to agreements if the total value of contributions by related shareholders or the total value of a joint venture will exceed the equivalent of €50,000 ($62,000) and €20,000 (in the case of agreements made with partners located in tax havens).

PE will be also covered by transfer pricing documentations requirement

Changes to the CIT Act also extend to settlements between Polish entities and their permanent establishments. Therefore, Polish taxpayers must apply the arm's-length principle and must prepare transfer pricing documentation for internal settlements between a Polish taxpayer and its permanent establishment.

Domestic transfer pricing adjustment

Under the new regulations, taxpayers may adjust income generated in transactions between Polish taxpayers, if:

  • the tax authorities recognise the conditions of a transaction made between Polish entities as non-arm's-length and adjust upward the income generated in this transaction by one of the entities; and

  • Polish entities file themselves an adjustment to income after tax inspection has been completed by tax inspection authorities which revealed non-arm's-length prices.

These changes aim to eliminate double taxation of transactions made between domestic related parties.

Applicability of new rules to agreements dated pre-January 1 2015

There are no transitional or grandfathering rules provided regarding applicability of the new law to agreements made before January 1 2015. The Ministry of Finance, however, presents a view that tax authorities may audit the conditions of partnership agreements made before January 1 2015 for arm's-length terms.

Renata Dluska (renata.dluska@mddp.pl) and Arkadiusz Zurawicki (arkadiusz.zurawicki@mddp.pl)

MDDP

Tel: +48 22 322 68 88

Website: www.mddp.pl

more across site & shared bottom lb ros

More from across our site

The event comes at an important moment for professionals dealing with practical realities related to this practice area
Germany’s dogmatic restriction of third-party investment in tax advisory firms will only serve to slow down innovation and access to justice
The Irish government has been told that it’s spending too much of its corporation tax receipts and should instead focus on running bigger surpluses; plus, the IRS is set to merge tax practitioner offices
A company risks double taxation, penalties and inquiry cost if it submits a form with anomalies under the new system, Asker Ali also tells ITR
Arindam Mitra and Robin Hart examine how aggregate TP rules clash with transaction-level customs rules, creating compliance risks and requiring granular, SKU-level pricing strategies
The scandal has come just three years after the PwC tax leaks controversy and has prompted KPMG’s Australian chief executive to resign
In the first of a two-part series on capital v revenue in R&D, Jayne Stokes explores these key concepts and where UK companies need to tread carefully
Magnus Pantzar is set to join as managing director after spending nearly a decade as EQT’s global head of tax
The OECD’s project was up for debate as Matt Williams spoke to ITR following BDO’s tax strategist survey, which uncovered increased complexity and costs among multinationals
The recent spree of firm mergers and acquisitions proves that geographic scale is the name of the game
Gift this article