Ukraine: Recent tax changes in Ukraine

International Tax Review is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Garden, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2025

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Ukraine: Recent tax changes in Ukraine

kotenko.jpg

kalyta.jpg

Vladimir Kotenko


Iryna Kalyta

New Ukraine-Cyprus Double Tax Treaty starts applying

On January 1 2014, the Ukraine-Cyprus double tax treaty started to apply. The new treaty supersedes the exceptionally beneficial USSR-Cyprus treaty and provides for 5%/15% on dividends, 2% on interest and 5%/10% on royalties. Ukraine and Cyprus also managed to resolve the discrepancy between the Greek and the Ukrainian texts of the Ukraine-Cyprus treaty and ensured that the USSR-Cyprus treaty ceased to apply when the new treaty started applying, and not earlier.

Decrease of corporate profit tax and VAT rate is postponed

Ukraine postponed the declared decrease of corporate profit tax and VAT rates. In 2014, the VAT rate will remain the same as in 2013 (20%), whereas corporate profit tax rate will go down by one percentage point and be 18% (as opposed to the initially declared 16%).

Transfer of shares exempt from transfer tax

Starting in 2014, the transfer of shares in joint stock companies is no longer subject to the special purpose excise tax (which could reach up to 1.5% of the contract value). This legislative development significantly narrows the list of transactions covered by the tax. The exemption was introduced as part of a package of technical changes to the Tax Code of Ukraine, so it is not clear whether it truly was intended by the law maker.

Developments in new Ukrainian transfer pricing rules

The Ukrainian government adopted a list of low-tax jurisdictions that will apply for transfer pricing purposes. Transactions between Ukrainian companies and non-Ukrainian companies resident in low tax jurisdictions will be subject to Ukrainian transfer pricing rules even if these companies are unrelated. The list comprises of 74 states where the corporate profit tax rate is lower than that of Ukraine by 5%, and includes Cyprus, Ireland and Switzerland.

The Ukrainian government has also published a draft transfer pricing reporting template. The template is similar to that used in Russia, and implies disclosure of detailed information on controlled operations.

Vladimir Kotenko (vladimir.kotenko@ua.ey.com) and Iryna Kalyta (iryna.kalyta@ua.ey.com)

EY

Tel: +380 44 490 3000

Fax: +380 44 490 3030

Website: www.ey.com/ua

more across site & shared bottom lb ros

More from across our site

ITR’s data has highlighted the US firm’s ambition to become America’s ‘premier’ tax player via a concerted partner recruitment strategy
Jaap Zwaan’s arrival continues a recent streak of A&M Tax investing in the region; in other news, the US and Japan struck a deal that significantly lowered tariff rates
In a world where international tax concepts rely on human activity, Leonard Wagenaar poses existential questions about the future of such ideas when AI is ever-present
France v Axa provides a practical illustration of how the burden of proof is applied in TP matters under French law, ITR also heard
In an exclusive interview with ITR, Ian Gary calls for a central public CbCR database and bemoans the US’s lack of involvement in international tax transparency
Reckitt Benckiser is to divest its Essential Home business, which includes more than 70 brands, to private equity firm Advent International
In the first of a new series of weekly opinion pieces, ITR Editor Tom Baker reflects on the OECD’s attempts to sanitise the US’s brazen pillar two negotiations
The threat of 50% tariffs on Brazilian goods coincides with new Brazilian legal powers to adopt retaliatory economic measures, local experts tell ITR
The country’s chancellor appears to have backtracked from previous pillar two scepticism; in other news, Donald Trump threatened Russia with 100% tariffs
In its latest G20 update, the OECD also revealed tense discussions with the US where the ‘significant threat’ of Section 899 was highlighted
Gift this article