Canada: Canadian 2014 Budget: A Focus on base erosion and profit shifting

International Tax Review is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Garden, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2025

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Canada: Canadian 2014 Budget: A Focus on base erosion and profit shifting

jamal.jpg

maclagan.jpg

Soraya M Jamal


Bill Maclagan

Canada's 2014 budget gives a clear indication of the Canadian government's desire to address perceived limitations in, and abuses of, Canada's international tax system. In particular, Budget 2014 contains a number of measures which further Canada's "ongoing efforts to protect the Canadian tax base and ensure tax fairness". While the proposed measures align with the OECD's base erosion and profit shifting initiatives, the government has reaffirmed its intention to retain an internationally competitive tax system.

Treaty shopping

Following a short period public consultation, Budget 2014 announced that the Canadian government proposes to adopt a domestic rule to prevent treaty shopping which would apply to all Canadian tax treaties.

The proposed rule would permit the Canadian government to deny a treaty-based benefit if one of the main purposes for undertaking a relevant transaction was to obtain that benefit. It would be presumed that the main purpose test would be satisfied if the relevant treaty income was primarily used to pay an amount to a person who would not have been entitled to an equivalent or more favourable treaty benefit had the person received that income directly. As a relieving measure, it is proposed that the treaty-benefit may be provided to the extent reasonable in the circumstances. A safe harbour would apply in certain circumstances such as where the relevant treaty income is received as a result of substantial active business activities carried on in the relevant treaty jurisdiction.

The government has initiated a public consultation in respect of these proposals. The consultation outcome, along with the OECD's upcoming BEPS recommendations, will be relevant in determining Canada's approach to treaty shopping. While it is unclear if the proposals will be implemented, existing cross-border arrangements should be examined as Budget 2014 contains no indication that transitional relief will be provided to such arrangements.

Tax planning by multinational enterprises

Budget 2014 also announced a public consultation on issues relating to international tax planning by multinational enterprises. The consultation concentrates on five questions which consider the impact of tax planning by multinationals and the government's role in respect thereof.

Additionally, public input is being sought on the effective collection of sales tax on e-commerce sales by foreign-based vendors. In particular, consideration is being given to whether foreign-based vendors should be required to register with Canadian tax authorities and charge sale tax on e-commerce sales to Canadians.

Soraya M Jamal (soraya.jamal@blakes.com) and Bill Maclagan (bill.maclagan@blakes.com)

Blake, Cassels & Graydon

Tel: +1 604 631 3300 Fax: +1 604 631 3309

Website: www.blakes.com

more across site & shared bottom lb ros

More from across our site

ITR’s data has highlighted the US firm’s ambition to become America’s ‘premier’ tax player via a concerted partner recruitment strategy
Jaap Zwaan’s arrival continues a recent streak of A&M Tax investing in the region; in other news, the US and Japan struck a deal that significantly lowered tariff rates
In a world where international tax concepts rely on human activity, Leonard Wagenaar poses existential questions about the future of such ideas when AI is ever-present
France v Axa provides a practical illustration of how the burden of proof is applied in TP matters under French law, ITR also heard
In an exclusive interview with ITR, Ian Gary calls for a central public CbCR database and bemoans the US’s lack of involvement in international tax transparency
Reckitt Benckiser is to divest its Essential Home business, which includes more than 70 brands, to private equity firm Advent International
In the first of a new series of weekly opinion pieces, ITR Editor Tom Baker reflects on the OECD’s attempts to sanitise the US’s brazen pillar two negotiations
The threat of 50% tariffs on Brazilian goods coincides with new Brazilian legal powers to adopt retaliatory economic measures, local experts tell ITR
The country’s chancellor appears to have backtracked from previous pillar two scepticism; in other news, Donald Trump threatened Russia with 100% tariffs
In its latest G20 update, the OECD also revealed tense discussions with the US where the ‘significant threat’ of Section 899 was highlighted
Gift this article