China: SAT’s formal assessment on service fees and royalty payments

International Tax Review is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Garden, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2025

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

China: SAT’s formal assessment on service fees and royalty payments

ho.jpg

lu.jpg

Khoonming Ho


Lewis Lu

In an area of immediate importance to taxpayers, the State Administration of Taxation (SAT) recently instructed tax bureaus across the country to survey and report back in September regarding companies in their jurisdictions which have made service fee or royalty payments to related parties between the years 2004 and 2013; these years are eligible for potential tax adjustments since the statute of limitations for transfer pricing audits is 10 years. In addition, the SAT urged tax bureaus to formally begin registering transfer pricing audits now of companies which engaged in such transactions deemed to be especially suspicious. In terms of focus, the SAT is paying particular attention to a number of specific issues, for example royalty payments made to:

  • entities in "tax haven" jurisdictions; and

  • overseas related parties with few or no functions, and which are therefore perceived to have little economic substance.

Also, cases where the Chinese taxpayer may have made significant contributions to the value of the intangibles, or where the intangibles may have eroded in value since initially being licensed, are receiving close scrutiny.

With regard to services, the SAT is focusing attention to those which:

  • relate to shareholder activities;

  • relate to supervision by the group headquarters;

  • may be duplicative to ones that the Chinese service recipient can or is also performing in-house or are already provided by third parties;

  • may be irrelevant to the Chinese service recipient given its functional and risk profile or business operations; or

  • for which the remuneration is already reflected in other transactions.

Against this background, the issuance of internal directives to actively scrutinise related party service and royalty payments from the SAT's perspective is likely a logical step to take. As a result, it is expected that a significant number of transfer pricing audits with focus on royalties and service fees will be conducted across the country.

For taxpayers, this is an area of immediate concern and action to manage the tax risks arising from service fee and royalty payments. It is recommended that companies review relevant documentation to ensure adequate evidence is in place and assess areas of potential controversy.

Khoonming Ho (khoonming.ho@kpmg.com)

KPMG, China and Hong Kong SAR

Tel: +86 (10) 8508 7082

Lewis Lu (lewis.lu@kpmg.com)

KPMG, Central China

Tel: +86 (21) 2212 3421

more across site & shared bottom lb ros

More from across our site

Given the US/G7 pillar two deal, the OECD is in danger of being replaced by the UN as the leading global tax reform forum
Cinven’s latest investment follows its acquisition of a stake in Grant Thornton UK in December; in other news, a barrister listed by HMRC as a tax avoidance promoter has alleged harassment
CIT base narrowing measures remain more prevalent than increased CIT rates, the report also highlighted
ITR's parent company, LBG, will acquire The Lawyer, a leading news, intelligence and data-driven insight provider for the legal industry, from Centaur Media
KPMG UK’s Graeme Webster and KPMG Meijburg & Co’s Eduard Sporken outline the 20-year evolution of MAPAs, with DEMPE analyses becoming more prevalent and MAPA requirements growing stricter
Rishi Joshi, of the Institute of Chartered Accountants of India, warns of potential judicial overreach as assets are recharacterised to bypass a legislative exclusion
Only 2% of in-house survey respondents said they were ‘heavy’ users of AI for TP, Aibidia’s report also found
There was a ‘deeply embedded culture within PwC that routinely disregarded formal confidentiality obligations,’ the chairman of Australia’s Tax Practitioners Board said
Jennifer Best was most recently the acting commissioner of the IRS’s large business and international division
Section 899’s exclusion from the One Big Beautiful Bill does not mean it has been nipped in the bud, Aruna Kalyanam also tells ITR
Gift this article