China: SAT’s formal assessment on service fees and royalty payments

International Tax Review is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Garden, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2026

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

China: SAT’s formal assessment on service fees and royalty payments

ho.jpg

lu.jpg

Khoonming Ho


Lewis Lu

In an area of immediate importance to taxpayers, the State Administration of Taxation (SAT) recently instructed tax bureaus across the country to survey and report back in September regarding companies in their jurisdictions which have made service fee or royalty payments to related parties between the years 2004 and 2013; these years are eligible for potential tax adjustments since the statute of limitations for transfer pricing audits is 10 years. In addition, the SAT urged tax bureaus to formally begin registering transfer pricing audits now of companies which engaged in such transactions deemed to be especially suspicious. In terms of focus, the SAT is paying particular attention to a number of specific issues, for example royalty payments made to:

  • entities in "tax haven" jurisdictions; and

  • overseas related parties with few or no functions, and which are therefore perceived to have little economic substance.

Also, cases where the Chinese taxpayer may have made significant contributions to the value of the intangibles, or where the intangibles may have eroded in value since initially being licensed, are receiving close scrutiny.

With regard to services, the SAT is focusing attention to those which:

  • relate to shareholder activities;

  • relate to supervision by the group headquarters;

  • may be duplicative to ones that the Chinese service recipient can or is also performing in-house or are already provided by third parties;

  • may be irrelevant to the Chinese service recipient given its functional and risk profile or business operations; or

  • for which the remuneration is already reflected in other transactions.

Against this background, the issuance of internal directives to actively scrutinise related party service and royalty payments from the SAT's perspective is likely a logical step to take. As a result, it is expected that a significant number of transfer pricing audits with focus on royalties and service fees will be conducted across the country.

For taxpayers, this is an area of immediate concern and action to manage the tax risks arising from service fee and royalty payments. It is recommended that companies review relevant documentation to ensure adequate evidence is in place and assess areas of potential controversy.

Khoonming Ho (khoonming.ho@kpmg.com)

KPMG, China and Hong Kong SAR

Tel: +86 (10) 8508 7082

Lewis Lu (lewis.lu@kpmg.com)

KPMG, Central China

Tel: +86 (21) 2212 3421

more across site & shared bottom lb ros

More from across our site

But partners at the firm admit that jumping ship to the US would not be as easy as some believe
Governments are rewriting tax policy for the AI era, deploying digital taxes, tailored incentives and algorithmic enforcement that redefine where value is created
Wingrove will succeed Bill Thomas, who has served in the role since 2017; in other news, Andersen unveiled a sharp increase in revenues for 2025
Partners are divided on Italy vs PDM D’s analytical depth, evidentiary standards, and what the judgment signals for future intra-group financing cases
As GCCs increasingly become strategic hubs, multinationals face heightened risks around permanent establishment and place of effective management
While all options presented ‘drawbacks’, European Commission tax leader Wopke Hoekstra said the controversial US carve-out deal has ‘many benefits’
From tech preparations to competitiveness concerns, Tax Systems’ Russell Gammon addresses the most pressing client considerations arising from the SbS deal
Despite estimates that the US/OECD agreement will cost countries billions, the Fair Tax Foundation’s Paul Monaghan believes the deal is a ‘necessary evil’
The firm’s eye-catching UK launch is a major statement of intent, but it will face stern opposition in its quest to be the top global tax player
The postponement came after industry representatives flagged implementation issues with the registration regime; in other news, firms made key tax partner additions
Gift this article