Australia: Draft guidance on new Australian transfer pricing rules

International Tax Review is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Garden, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2025

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Australia: Draft guidance on new Australian transfer pricing rules

seymour.jpg

Tom Seymour

The Australian Taxation Office (ATO) has released draft guidance on the new Australian transfer pricing rules. The draft guidance addresses the topics of documentation, penalties, and the 'reconstruction' rules. The new transfer pricing rules include specific provisions that, in certain circumstances, require the taxpayer to disregard in whole, or in part, the actual transactions entered into and replace them with hypothetical transactions. The intention was for the rules to be consistent with the 'exceptional circumstances' under which the OECD Transfer Pricing Guidelines permit the non-recognition of transactions.

Although the intention may be that the reconstruction provisions should only apply in exceptional cases, the ATO's draft guidance is very broad and will require taxpayers to consider the potential application of these provisions to all dealings they enter into. While this approach may be deliberate so as to encompass a broad range of fact patterns and possibilities, it is far from definitive and is likely to cause undue concern and uncertainty among taxpayers and increase their compliance burden in light of the self-assessment based application of these provisions.

The new transfer pricing rules also introduced documentation requirements as a prerequisite for establishing a reasonably arguable position on a transfer pricing matter. This impacts the penalties that may apply in the event of an adjustment. To meet the new requirements, documentation must be prepared by the time of lodging the Australian income tax return and be in the possession of, or freely accessible to, the Australian taxpayer. The documentation must be consistent with the OECD Transfer Pricing Guidelines, while also addressing the particular requirements of the Australian transfer pricing law (such as the reconstruction provisions).

Taxpayers who have prepared documentation in prior years based on the ATO's previous guidance will need to review their approach as some modifications may be required to ensure the new legislative requirements are met.

Interestingly, the ATO's draft guidance suggests certain global business and industry information should be included in the Australian transfer pricing documentation. The OECD's current proposals for transfer pricing documentation would require this information to be compiled in a global master file rather than in local country files. Arguably, the ATO's expectations of the global information that should be included in the local Australian file go beyond what would be required for the OECD master file.

As the new rules operate on a self-assessment basis, all taxpayers must assess whether their related party dealings are arm's-length before lodging the tax return, even if they choose not to prepare formal transfer pricing documentation. Many taxpayers are likely to seek to perform at least a preliminary assessment before year-end to reduce the likelihood of needing to make a post-year end adjustment in the tax return which may give rise to double tax. Taxpayers with a June 30 year-end will be the first required to apply the new rules (to the year ending June 30 2014).

Tom Seymour (tom.seymour@au.pwc.com)

PwC

Tel: +61 (7) 3257 8623

more across site & shared bottom lb ros

More from across our site

ITR’s data has highlighted the US firm’s ambition to become America’s ‘premier’ tax player via a concerted partner recruitment strategy
Jaap Zwaan’s arrival continues a recent streak of A&M Tax investing in the region; in other news, the US and Japan struck a deal that significantly lowered tariff rates
In a world where international tax concepts rely on human activity, Leonard Wagenaar poses existential questions about the future of such ideas when AI is ever-present
France v Axa provides a practical illustration of how the burden of proof is applied in TP matters under French law, ITR also heard
In an exclusive interview with ITR, Ian Gary calls for a central public CbCR database and bemoans the US’s lack of involvement in international tax transparency
Reckitt Benckiser is to divest its Essential Home business, which includes more than 70 brands, to private equity firm Advent International
In the first of a new series of weekly opinion pieces, ITR Editor Tom Baker reflects on the OECD’s attempts to sanitise the US’s brazen pillar two negotiations
The threat of 50% tariffs on Brazilian goods coincides with new Brazilian legal powers to adopt retaliatory economic measures, local experts tell ITR
The country’s chancellor appears to have backtracked from previous pillar two scepticism; in other news, Donald Trump threatened Russia with 100% tariffs
In its latest G20 update, the OECD also revealed tense discussions with the US where the ‘significant threat’ of Section 899 was highlighted
Gift this article