Poland: Introducing one of most unorthodox CFC systems in the world? No local capital gains participation exemption

International Tax Review is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Garden, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2025

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Poland: Introducing one of most unorthodox CFC systems in the world? No local capital gains participation exemption

glowacki.jpg

Bartosz Glowacki

Poland wants to introduce controlled foreign corporation (CFC) rules, which may start to apply even already to 2015 profits. The Polish government has cherry-picked from CFC mechanisms around the world, but somehow only the most oppressive ideas were copied. Any company seated in a territory formally blacklisted as a tax haven by Polish Ministry of Finance (or a territory with which there is no exchange of information agreement) will be treated as a CFC. No exemptions are provided. Another CFC category, which includes even companies seated within the EU and tax treaty countries, are non-Polish companies, in which the Polish tax resident (corporate or individual) owns for an uninterrupted period of 30 days per year, directly or indirectly 25% of share capital, voting rights or share in profits, when at least 50% of that company's income is passive and taxed at a rate lower than 14.25%.

The overseas company from a treaty country which is not blacklisted will not be recognised as a CFC if it runs real business. There is no definition of "real business", but some guidance is provided by the law.

Polish taxpayers will have to keep a special register of all CFCs owned directly or indirectly and to record all events in each CFC to make it possible to calculate the income of the CFC and the tax due in Poland. And all calculations must be based on Polish rules, which in fact means double accounting for CFC, one local where the CFC is registered and the second for Polish purposes.

CFC characterisation will not apply to companies with revenue below €250.000 per year. Foreign branches may be treated as CFC. Poland will still be one of the very few worldwide exceptions among modern tax systems, as Poland does not provide for any participation exemption for capital gains. There is no Polish holding company system and for the time being the government has no intention to make it. So with CFC and no holding company regime, Poland may become the most tax unfriendly country for international expansion.

However, Poland still offers very interesting exemptions, binding till 2016, for businesses investing in Special Economic Zones.

These are the main characteristics of the Polish CFC system, but it is still the draft.

Bartosz Glowacki (bartosz.glowacki@mddp.pl)

MDDP

Tel: +48 22 322 68 88

Website: www.mddp.pl

more across site & shared bottom lb ros

More from across our site

Luxembourg’s reform agenda continues at pace in 2025, with targeted measures for start-ups and alternative investment funds
Veteran Elizabeth Arrendale will lead the new advisory practice, which will support clients with M&A tax structuring, post-deal integration, and more
MAP cases keep increasing, and cases closed aren’t keeping pace with the number started, the OECD’s Sriram Govind also told an ITR summit
Nobody likes paperwork or paying money, but the assertion that legal accreditation doesn’t offer value to firms and clients alike is false
Ryan hopes the buyout will help it expand into Asia and the Middle East; in other news, three German finance ministers have called for a suspension of pillar two
SKAT, which was represented by Pinsent Masons, had accused Sanjay Shah and other defendants of fraudulent dividend tax refund claims
TP managers must be able to explain technical issues in simple terms, ITR’s European Transfer Pricing Forum heard
Prudential had challenged HMRC over VAT group relief; in other news, Donald Trump unveiled timber and wood tariffs, and the European Commission published a ViDA implementation strategy
Australia’s CbCR rules have ‘widespread support’ and do not put American companies at a competitive disadvantage, the FACT Coalition said
Baker McKenzie advised two of the member firms involved, while several advisers provided transaction counsel to US-based Grant Thornton Advisors
Gift this article