Germany: Global-China cash pooling and transfer pricing implications

International Tax Review is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 4 Bouverie Street, London, EC4Y 8AX

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2025

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Germany: Global-China cash pooling and transfer pricing implications

andresen.jpg

tao.jpg

Ulf Andresen


Yu Tao

The past year saw major movements towards liberalising the currency of the world's second largest economy, the Chinese Yuan or Renminbi (CNY). Such movements include the simplification of cross-border Yuan transaction procedures by the People's Bank of China, guidance for the Shanghai Pilot Free Trade Zone, and the opening up of global CNY offshore centres including Frankfurt. German multinationals, some with huge accumulated CNY cash surpluses in China have had difficulty with cash repatriation. They now have the opportunity to use their surplus cash by connecting their Chinese and global cash pools. Successful pilot cases have been launched both within and outside the Shanghai Pilot Free Trade Zone (entities in this zone enjoy simplified procedures) and now banks are offering cash pool linkage as a product.

Transfer pricing challenges arise from the determination of arm's-length cash-pooling interest rates for CNY, mainly because of the co-existence of onshore and offshore interest and currency exchange systems. The two markets deliver different third-party benchmarks and mixed opportunity costs for the fund providers. On the other hand, fund users are able to borrow alternative free-trade currencies at lower interest rates. Here the rate difference is primarily driven by the evolving outlook of CNY exchange rates. This situation is further complicated by the mismatched expectations of the German and Chinese tax authorities on intercompany financing interest rates, built up from their historical experience. German multinationals that are interested in exploring this cash-pooling mechanism need to consider a number of transfer pricing factors, including the selection of benchmarked markets, identification of opportunity costs, hedging policy and costs, appropriate documentation, as well as the implication of the Chinese thin-capitalisation and German interest limitation rules.

Ulf Andresen (ulf.andresen@de.pwc.com)

Tel: +49 69 9585 3551
Yu Tao (yu.tao@de.pwc.com)

Tel: +49 69 9585 6408

PwC

Website: www.pwc.com

more across site & shared bottom lb ros

More from across our site

Levine, who served under the Joe Biden administration, led the US’s negotiations on the OECD’s two-pillar solution
The deal to acquire ITR's parent company is expected to complete by the end of May 2025
JBS, the biggest meat company in the world, allegedly used Luxembourgian ‘mailbox companies’ to avoid taxes between 2019 and 2022
Despite the conviction of Jessa Dabalos, the Tax Practitioners’ Board’s investigative work continues with five outstanding PwC scandal probes
Heads of tax need to push their teams forward as strategic business advisers to add value across their organisations, says Sandy Markwick
Scott Bessent reportedly felt undermined by Musk naming Gary Shapley as acting IRS commissioner; in other news, Baker Tilly will combine with a top 15 US firm
The promise of nine years’ tax certainty and a ‘rational and pragmatic’ government process makes APAs a no-brainer, Indian tax advisers tell ITR
Despite garnering significant revenues from multinationals, Italy’s digital services tax presents pressing double taxation issues, say Stefano Simontacchi and Francesco Saverio Scandone of BonelliErede
ITR’s research shows that in-house tax counsel in Asia also feel underserved by their advisers’ international networks
World Tax global head of research Jon Moore tells ITR how his team spots standout submissions, and gives early statistical insights into this year’s entries
Gift this article