Switzerland: Revised draft legislation on Corporate Tax Reform III introduced into parliament

International Tax Review is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Garden, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2025

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Switzerland: Revised draft legislation on Corporate Tax Reform III introduced into parliament

kistler.jpg

zulauf.jpg

Jacques Kistler


Rene Zulauf

On June 5 the Swiss federal government introduced revised draft legislation on Corporate Tax Reform III (CTR III), which would sunset all special corporate tax regimes, such as mixed or holding company regimes. The draft legislation contains various measures to compensate for the elimination of beneficial tax regimes:

  • Reduction of headline tax rates on a cantonal/communal level at the discretion of cantons;

  • Introduction of a patent box applicable to patented IP for which the R&D spend occurred in Switzerland (in line with the OECD's modified nexus approach);

  • Introduction of excess R&D deductions at the discretion of cantons;

  • Allowing a step-up (including for self-created goodwill) for direct federal and cantonal/communal taxes upon the migration of a company or of additional activities and functions to Switzerland;

  • Tax privileged release of hidden reserves for cantonal/communal tax purposes for companies transitioning out of tax privileged cantonal tax regimes (such as mixed or holding companies) in a manner that this would reduce the cantonal/communal tax rate over a period of five years, such that in some cantons the previous tax privileged rate could be achieved for a period of five years.

  • Reduction of the cantonal/communal capital tax in relation to holding of participations and patented IP at the discretion of cantons;

  • Abolition of the 1% capital issuance tax on equity contributions;

  • Extension of the eligibility for foreign tax credits to Swiss permanent establishments of foreign entities.

The revised draft legislation is in some ways more attractive and in other ways more restrictive than the initial draft legislation introduced last year. CTR III is, however, still a work in progress and may change depending on the success of stakeholder lobbying.

The two-chamber Swiss parliament should vote on CTR III in autumn 2015 and spring 2016 respectively. There may also be a national referendum to allow the public to vote on the issue. Cantonal tax laws would subsequently have to be amended to reflect the changes, so that the most likely date for the law to become effective would be January 1 2019.

Jacques Kistler (jkistler@deloitte.ch) and Rene Zulauf (rzulauf@deloitte.ch)

Deloitte

Tel: +41 58 279 8164 and +41 58 279 6359

Website: www.deloitte.ch

more across site & shared bottom lb ros

More from across our site

Whether it be due to a fragmented advisory market or a rise in M&A, Italy’s frenetic hiring has not gone unnoticed by ITR’s Talent Tracker
The deal gives Azets 14 new partners and boosts its Swedish revenues to over $100 million; in other news, Svalner Atlas launched in Copenhagen
The tax technology company will be providing a free demonstration of its OTP software and offering best practice advice on whether to ‘buy or build’ on September 8
Johanes Glorinus Saragih of Indonesia’s Directorate General of Taxes outlines the nation’s delicate geopolitical situation, as it sits between a rock and a hard place with the US and pillar two
The law firm’s head of tax, trade and wealth management likens tax legislation to a complex puzzle, recommends a sturdy coffee mug, and explains why acronyms make tax cool
The global tax and accounting firm has appointed two experienced TP advisers from a New Jersey-based boutique
A lack of commitment from major jurisdictions and the associated compliance burden are obstacles facing the OECD initiative
Richard Gregg is no longer fit and proper to be a tax agent, said the TPB; in other news, MHA completed its acquisition of Baker Tilly South-East Europe
Recent Indian case law emphasises the importance of economic substance over mere legal form in evaluating tax implications, say authors from Khaitan & Co
PepsiCo was represented by PwC, while the ATO was advised by MinterEllison, an Australian-headquartered law firm
Gift this article