Ireland: Recent developments in Ireland’s R&D tax credit regime

International Tax Review is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Garden, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2026

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Ireland: Recent developments in Ireland’s R&D tax credit regime

duffy.jpg

bailey.jpg

Joe Duffy


Tomás Bailey

Earlier this year, the Irish Revenue Commissioners (Revenue) published updated guidelines on Ireland's research and development (R&D) tax credit regime (the Guidelines). The Guidelines follow recent legislative amendments which expand Ireland's tax incentives for R&D activities and further enhance Ireland's attractiveness as a location for developing intellectual property. Under Irish tax law, a company can claim a tax credit of 25% of qualifying expenditure, in addition to the standard corporation tax deduction, in respect of certain expenditure incurred in carrying out R&D activities across a broad range of sectors. The tax credit is available to offset against a company's Irish corporation tax liability. Excess credits may be carried forward for offset against future profits or may be repaid to the taxpayer in certain circumstances.

Recent enhancements

The Finance Act 2014 introduced changes to improve the tax credit available for expenditure incurred by companies on R&D activities. Of particular note is the change to a volume-based regime. Previously, the tax credit available for qualifying R&D expenditure was only available on an incremental basis. The credit was limited to the amount by which expenditure on R&D exceeded the expenditure incurred in 2003 (the designated base year). Although the base year threshold had been incrementally eroded in recent years, its complete removal means that the R&D tax credit can now be claimed in respect of all qualifying expenditure incurred in accounting periods commencing on or after January 1 2015.

The Guidelines

The Guidelines provide an updated insight into Revenue's interpretation and application of the R&D tax credit regime. The Guidelines are more detailed than previous Revenue guidance and convey an increased emphasis on the scope of qualifying expenditure and the importance of supporting documentation. The Guidelines also set out Revenue's view on the appropriate treatment of expenditure incurred on outsourced R&D activities and the transferability of unused credits between group entities.

Under the legislation, costs which are not incurred wholly and exclusively in carrying on the R&D activity do not qualify when calculating the credit. The Guidelines list a number of examples of such costs, including insurance, travel, repairs, maintenance and interest. The Guidelines also provide guidance on the treatment of staff costs for the purpose of the credit.

Documenting R&D activities

The importance of maintaining accurate, contemporaneous records in support of claims for R&D tax credits is emphasised in the Guidelines. A taxpayer should maintain sufficient contemporaneous supporting documentation to demonstrate that the activities in question are qualifying R&D activities and that all costs incurred in carrying on those activities have been properly accounted for. A failure to maintain adequate records may result in a claim for the R&D tax credit being disallowed. The Guidelines confirm that electronic records are sufficient in this regard. Revenue accepts that disparities exist in record-keeping practices across different industries.

It is anticipated that the enhanced R&D tax credit regime, coupled with the new Irish Knowledge Development Box (in respect of which initial draft legislation was issued in July 2015), will further incentivise Irish headquartered companies and multinationals to locate their R&D activities in Ireland.

Joe Duffy (joseph.duffy@matheson.com) and Tomás Bailey (tomás.bailey@matheson.com)

Matheson

Tel: +353 1 232 2000

Website: www.matheson.com

more across site & shared bottom lb ros

More from across our site

While the IBS incorporates taxable events previously covered by state and municipal taxes, its governance and operational logic represent a significant departure from the legacy model
The new office on the fourth floor of 4 More London will span 14,230 square feet, with the potential to expand to the first and second floors
MNEs now face a shift from modelling to execution as the side‑by‑side deal forces tax teams to upgrade systems, harmonise data, and prevent costly pillar two mismatches
As recent surveys suggest a disconnect between AI adoption and employee engagement, the big four risk digging themselves into a strategic hole
Almost three-quarters of surveyed tax professionals are concerned about inaccurate AI outputs; in other news, Dentons hired a partner from CMS to lead its Belgian tax team
Long-running, high-value and complex enquiries are a significant reason for HM Revenue and Customs’s increased TP yield, experts suggest
Landmark legal updates in India have led companies to prioritise specialised tax advisers over accountants, ITR has found
Brazil’s shift to a nationwide consumption tax is more than conceptual; it fundamentally transforms municipal revenue, enforcement, and administrative disputes
While some advisers praised the ruling’s definition of a ‘voucher’ for VAT purposes, a UK partner said the case left unanswered questions
While pillar two has been enacted on paper in Brazil, companies are encountering a range of practical compliance issues, ITR has heard
Gift this article