Canada: Canadian authorities may access taxpayer self-assessments for uncertain tax positions

International Tax Review is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Garden, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2026

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement


Canada: Canadian authorities may access taxpayer self-assessments for uncertain tax positions

shafer.jpg

schmid.jpg

Jeffrey Shafer


Evan Schmid

The Federal Court of Canada recently ruled that the Canada Revenue Agency (CRA) can compel a taxpayer to produce material related to the taxpayer's assessment of its own uncertain tax positions. In MNR v BP Canada Energy Company, 2015 FC 714, CRA applied for an order compelling BP to disclose the list of tax issues considered uncertain in connection with the preparation of financial statements for BP's ultimate parent. BP argued that mandatory production of the 'issues list' was not necessary for CRA to perform its audit, was unfair to BP, and was contrary to CRA's longstanding policy that "although not routinely required, officials may request tax accrual working papers".

The Court agreed with CRA and ordered BP to produce the issues list. The Court found that:

  • it was irrelevant that CRA did not need the list to conduct and conclude a comprehensive and complete audit;

  • it was sufficient that CRA wanted the issues list for purposes of assisting with ongoing and future audits;

  • the mandatory production of the issues list did not constitute a 'self-audit' requirement for the taxpayer;

  • it was irrelevant that the issues list was not required to be kept by BP pursuant to the Income Tax Act (Canada); and

  • the issues list, even though based on BP's subjective views, was within the scope of CRA's audit powers because it relates to the enforcement of the Income Tax Act.

The Court also rejected the arguments that an order compelling production of the issues list would be unfair or discriminatory, or that the order should be refused because of alleged CRA bad faith during the audit.

This decision fits with a trend of decisions focussing on increased transparency (including, for example, the recent Superior Plus Corp. case requiring CRA to disclose internal documents relevant to the decision to apply the general anti-avoidance rule (GAAR)). It is not clear whether the decision will change CRA's practice in terms of when it demands production of accounting working papers. As of the writing of this article, BP's appeal period has not yet lapsed.

Jeffrey Shafer (jeffrey.shafer@blakes.com) andEvan Schmid (evan.schmid@blakes.com), Toronto

Blake, Cassels & Graydon

Tel: +1 416 863 3187 and +1 416 863 4341

Website: www.blakes.com

more across site & shared bottom lb ros

More from across our site

Awards
Leading firms and individuals gathered in Dubai to celebrate standout legal, dealmaking and tax work across the region
Tax authorities want more revenue, have better tools to find it and are increasingly willing to fight for it
Audifina, the sixth-largest firm of its kind in Lithuania, will bring a 90-strong team with offices in Vilnius and Kaunas to RSM’s international platform
As global capability centres use AI to deliver services, MNEs face a fresh wave of PE and TP exposure that their existing playbooks weren't built for
The deal for Comtax hands Ryan immediate scale in Brazil, with a near-70-strong team serving clients from São Paulo
The arrivals of Julio Castro and Adam Blakemore mean the firm has added six tax partners to its global practice since the start of 2025
Tax authorities have gained unprecedented transparency through CbCR, but a new study suggests they may not be looking in the right places
The future chief tax officer will be judged not only on compliance, but on their ability to harness data, technology and AI to support strategic decision-making
More than 200 tier promotions reshaped this year's European rankings as several international firms strengthened their positions in key tax markets
Ryosuke Takemura, OECD policy adviser, countered that the organisation’s role is ‘not to solve these issues one by one’ but to prevent tax disputes in general
Gift this article