Canada: Canadian authorities may access taxpayer self-assessments for uncertain tax positions

International Tax Review is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Garden, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2026

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Canada: Canadian authorities may access taxpayer self-assessments for uncertain tax positions

shafer.jpg

schmid.jpg

Jeffrey Shafer


Evan Schmid

The Federal Court of Canada recently ruled that the Canada Revenue Agency (CRA) can compel a taxpayer to produce material related to the taxpayer's assessment of its own uncertain tax positions. In MNR v BP Canada Energy Company, 2015 FC 714, CRA applied for an order compelling BP to disclose the list of tax issues considered uncertain in connection with the preparation of financial statements for BP's ultimate parent. BP argued that mandatory production of the 'issues list' was not necessary for CRA to perform its audit, was unfair to BP, and was contrary to CRA's longstanding policy that "although not routinely required, officials may request tax accrual working papers".

The Court agreed with CRA and ordered BP to produce the issues list. The Court found that:

  • it was irrelevant that CRA did not need the list to conduct and conclude a comprehensive and complete audit;

  • it was sufficient that CRA wanted the issues list for purposes of assisting with ongoing and future audits;

  • the mandatory production of the issues list did not constitute a 'self-audit' requirement for the taxpayer;

  • it was irrelevant that the issues list was not required to be kept by BP pursuant to the Income Tax Act (Canada); and

  • the issues list, even though based on BP's subjective views, was within the scope of CRA's audit powers because it relates to the enforcement of the Income Tax Act.

The Court also rejected the arguments that an order compelling production of the issues list would be unfair or discriminatory, or that the order should be refused because of alleged CRA bad faith during the audit.

This decision fits with a trend of decisions focussing on increased transparency (including, for example, the recent Superior Plus Corp. case requiring CRA to disclose internal documents relevant to the decision to apply the general anti-avoidance rule (GAAR)). It is not clear whether the decision will change CRA's practice in terms of when it demands production of accounting working papers. As of the writing of this article, BP's appeal period has not yet lapsed.

Jeffrey Shafer (jeffrey.shafer@blakes.com) andEvan Schmid (evan.schmid@blakes.com), Toronto

Blake, Cassels & Graydon

Tel: +1 416 863 3187 and +1 416 863 4341

Website: www.blakes.com

more across site & shared bottom lb ros

More from across our site

As recent surveys suggest a disconnect between AI adoption and employee engagement, the big four risk digging themselves into a strategic hole
Almost three-quarters of surveyed tax professionals are concerned about inaccurate AI outputs; in other news, Dentons hired a partner from CMS to lead its Belgian tax team
Long-running, high-value and complex enquiries are a significant reason for HM Revenue and Customs’s increased TP yield, experts suggest
Landmark legal updates in India have led companies to prioritise specialised tax advisers over accountants, ITR has found
Brazil’s shift to a nationwide consumption tax is more than conceptual; it fundamentally transforms municipal revenue, enforcement, and administrative disputes
While some advisers praised the ruling’s definition of a ‘voucher’ for VAT purposes, a UK partner said the case left unanswered questions
While pillar two has been enacted on paper in Brazil, companies are encountering a range of practical compliance issues, ITR has heard
Moore, founding partner of the Chicago tax boutique which bears her name, shares her career wisdom for ITR’s new Women in Tax interview series
But partners at the firm admit that jumping ship to the US would not be as easy as some believe
Governments are rewriting tax policy for the AI era, deploying digital taxes, tailored incentives and algorithmic enforcement that redefine where value is created
Gift this article