Brazil: Tax rulings issued dealing with the registration of payments in SISCOSERV

International Tax Review is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Garden, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2025

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Brazil: Tax rulings issued dealing with the registration of payments in SISCOSERV

jeffrey.jpg

conomy.jpg

Philippe Jeffrey


Mark Conomy

On February 25 2015 and February 26 2015, the Brazilian Federal Revenue Authorities (RFB) issued a number of rulings in response to formal consultations by taxpayers in relation to the registration of certain payments in the Integrated System of Foreign Service Trade (SISCOSERV). By way of background, since August 2012, Brazilian individuals, legal entities and other entities without legal personality have been required to provide information to the Ministry for Development, Industry, and International Trade in relation to transactions carried out with non-residents involving services, intangibles and other operations that produce changes to the Brazilian entity's net worth.

In response to continuing uncertainty over whether certain transactions should be registered in the SISCOSERV, the RFB have issued a number of rulings responding to formal consultations made by taxpayers.

On February 25 2015, the RFB issued Tax Ruling No. 20/2015 in relation to whether salary and allowance payments made by Brazilian entities to their employees sent to work abroad should be registered in the SISCOSERV. Broadly, registration in the SISCOSERV will be required where the transaction is realised between a resident or entity/individual domiciled in Brazil and a resident or entity/individual domiciled abroad. Brazilian workers abroad are generally considered residents in Brazil during the first 12 consecutive months of absence from the country. After that (that is, from the 13th consecutive month of absence from Brazil), the worker should be considered a non-resident for Brazilian tax purposes and therefore any payments made to this worker should be registered with SISCOSERV. The above treatment will also apply where the payments to the worker are made through intermediary agencies abroad.

On February 25 2015, the RFB issued Tax Ruling No. 21/2015, providing guidance on registration requirements for payments made by Brazilian entities in relation to cost sharing arrangements, where the activity is classified under the Nomenclature of Services (NBS). The NBS sets out a list of codes in order to classify the activities for SISCOSERV purposes (some codes being quite specific while others are quite broad). Pursuant to the ruling, the RFB considers that where a foreign group entity acquires services from a third party, which are subsequently recharged to the Brazilian entity, information in relation to the payments made by the Brazilian entity to the foreign group entity should be registered in the SISCOSERV. Further, where the foreign group entity uses its own administrative structure to provide benefits to the group (including the Brazilian entity), information relating to the payments made by the Brazilian entity to the foreign group entity in relation to the provision of these services should be registered, on the basis that such transactions produce changes to the Brazilian entity's net worth.

On February 26 2015, the RFB issued Tax Ruling No. 32/2015 in relation to whether payments made by Brazilian entities with a 'commercial presence' abroad are obliged to register in the SISCOSERV, information related to the acquisition of services, intangibles and other transactions producing a change in net worth. Under the General Agreement on Trade in Services (a treaty to which Brazil is a signatory) the expression 'commercial presence' includes representative offices of the Brazilian companies, located abroad. Therefore, where representative offices of Brazilian entities located abroad make acquisitions of services, intangibles or enter into other operations resulting in a change to the net equity, the relevant information should be registered in the SISCOSERV.

Philippe Jeffrey (philippe.jeffrey@br.pwc.com) and Mark Conomy (conomy.mark@br.pwc.com)

PwC

Website: www.pwc.com

more across site & shared bottom lb ros

More from across our site

Recent Indian case law emphasises the importance of economic substance over mere legal form in evaluating tax implications, say authors from Khaitan & Co
PepsiCo was represented by PwC, while the ATO was advised by MinterEllison, an Australian-headquartered law firm
Three tax experts dissect the impact of a 30% tariff that has shaken up trade relations between South Africa and the US
Awards
ITR is delighted to reveal all the shortlisted nominees for the 2025 Americas Tax Awards
As we move into an era of ‘substance over form’, determining the fundamental nature of a particular instrument is key when evaluating the tax implications of selling hybrid securities
It stands in stark contrast to a mere 1% increase in firmwide revenue since last year
It follows a court case concerning a Freedom of Information request lodged by the founder of a software company
After years of deafening silence, the UK tax authority is taking overdue action against corporates that fail to prevent the facilitation of tax evasion
The US president has raised India’s tariff rate to 50% because of its importation of Russian oil; in other news, firms made key international tax partner hires
Tax auditors themselves had not been aware of the new TP ‘transaction matrix’ requirements, ITR hears as five German partners share their client experiences
Gift this article