Brazil: Tax rulings issued dealing with the registration of payments in SISCOSERV

International Tax Review is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Garden, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2026

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Brazil: Tax rulings issued dealing with the registration of payments in SISCOSERV

jeffrey.jpg

conomy.jpg

Philippe Jeffrey


Mark Conomy

On February 25 2015 and February 26 2015, the Brazilian Federal Revenue Authorities (RFB) issued a number of rulings in response to formal consultations by taxpayers in relation to the registration of certain payments in the Integrated System of Foreign Service Trade (SISCOSERV). By way of background, since August 2012, Brazilian individuals, legal entities and other entities without legal personality have been required to provide information to the Ministry for Development, Industry, and International Trade in relation to transactions carried out with non-residents involving services, intangibles and other operations that produce changes to the Brazilian entity's net worth.

In response to continuing uncertainty over whether certain transactions should be registered in the SISCOSERV, the RFB have issued a number of rulings responding to formal consultations made by taxpayers.

On February 25 2015, the RFB issued Tax Ruling No. 20/2015 in relation to whether salary and allowance payments made by Brazilian entities to their employees sent to work abroad should be registered in the SISCOSERV. Broadly, registration in the SISCOSERV will be required where the transaction is realised between a resident or entity/individual domiciled in Brazil and a resident or entity/individual domiciled abroad. Brazilian workers abroad are generally considered residents in Brazil during the first 12 consecutive months of absence from the country. After that (that is, from the 13th consecutive month of absence from Brazil), the worker should be considered a non-resident for Brazilian tax purposes and therefore any payments made to this worker should be registered with SISCOSERV. The above treatment will also apply where the payments to the worker are made through intermediary agencies abroad.

On February 25 2015, the RFB issued Tax Ruling No. 21/2015, providing guidance on registration requirements for payments made by Brazilian entities in relation to cost sharing arrangements, where the activity is classified under the Nomenclature of Services (NBS). The NBS sets out a list of codes in order to classify the activities for SISCOSERV purposes (some codes being quite specific while others are quite broad). Pursuant to the ruling, the RFB considers that where a foreign group entity acquires services from a third party, which are subsequently recharged to the Brazilian entity, information in relation to the payments made by the Brazilian entity to the foreign group entity should be registered in the SISCOSERV. Further, where the foreign group entity uses its own administrative structure to provide benefits to the group (including the Brazilian entity), information relating to the payments made by the Brazilian entity to the foreign group entity in relation to the provision of these services should be registered, on the basis that such transactions produce changes to the Brazilian entity's net worth.

On February 26 2015, the RFB issued Tax Ruling No. 32/2015 in relation to whether payments made by Brazilian entities with a 'commercial presence' abroad are obliged to register in the SISCOSERV, information related to the acquisition of services, intangibles and other transactions producing a change in net worth. Under the General Agreement on Trade in Services (a treaty to which Brazil is a signatory) the expression 'commercial presence' includes representative offices of the Brazilian companies, located abroad. Therefore, where representative offices of Brazilian entities located abroad make acquisitions of services, intangibles or enter into other operations resulting in a change to the net equity, the relevant information should be registered in the SISCOSERV.

Philippe Jeffrey (philippe.jeffrey@br.pwc.com) and Mark Conomy (conomy.mark@br.pwc.com)

PwC

Website: www.pwc.com

more across site & shared bottom lb ros

More from across our site

While the IBS incorporates taxable events previously covered by state and municipal taxes, its governance and operational logic represent a significant departure from the legacy model
The new office on the fourth floor of 4 More London will span 14,230 square feet, with the potential to expand to the first and second floors
MNEs now face a shift from modelling to execution as the side‑by‑side deal forces tax teams to upgrade systems, harmonise data, and prevent costly pillar two mismatches
As recent surveys suggest a disconnect between AI adoption and employee engagement, the big four risk digging themselves into a strategic hole
Almost three-quarters of surveyed tax professionals are concerned about inaccurate AI outputs; in other news, Dentons hired a partner from CMS to lead its Belgian tax team
Long-running, high-value and complex enquiries are a significant reason for HM Revenue and Customs’s increased TP yield, experts suggest
Landmark legal updates in India have led companies to prioritise specialised tax advisers over accountants, ITR has found
Brazil’s shift to a nationwide consumption tax is more than conceptual; it fundamentally transforms municipal revenue, enforcement, and administrative disputes
While some advisers praised the ruling’s definition of a ‘voucher’ for VAT purposes, a UK partner said the case left unanswered questions
While pillar two has been enacted on paper in Brazil, companies are encountering a range of practical compliance issues, ITR has heard
Gift this article