China: New regulations to encourage corporate restructuring and investment with non-monetary assets

International Tax Review is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 4 Bouverie Street, London, EC4Y 8AX

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2025

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

China: New regulations to encourage corporate restructuring and investment with non-monetary assets

ho.jpg

lu.jpg

Khoonming Ho


Lewis Lu

The State Council issued a circular – 'Guidelines on further optimising market environment for M&A restructuring' – which requires finance and tax authorities to "amend the regulations governing special tax treatment for M&A restructuring activities". As a response, in December 2014, the Ministry of Finance and the State Administration of Taxation jointly issued Circular 109 (Caishui [2014] No.109) and Circular 116 (Caishui [2014] No.116) respectively to provide further clarity on the special restructuring under Circular 59 (Caishui [2009] No.59) as well as investment with non-monetary assets. Circular 109 relaxes the 'ratio limits' in relation to share or asset acquisition to enjoy special restructuring under Circular 59. For a share (asset) acquisition, the shares (assets) acquired should be at least 75% of the total shares (assets) of the acquiree entity under Circular 59, while the minimum ratio limit is reduced to 50% under Circular 109.

Circular 109 also adds the following two additional situations which can qualify for special restructuring:

  • The PRC transferor and the PRC transferee have a 100% direct-investment holding relationship; or

  • The PRC transferor and the PRC transferee are 100% directly owned by the same PRC shareholder or the same group of PRC shareholders

The CIT treatment for investment with non-monetary assets under Circular 91 (Caishui [2013] No. 91), which was adopted for entities in Shanghai's pilot free trade zone, has been expanded to the rest of China due to the release of Circular 116.

Table 1

Entity

Tax treatment

Investor

Tax treatment for the gains derived from investment with non-monetary assets Investment gains = fair market value (FMV) of the invested assets – tax basis of the assets

(Investment gains can be realised equally for no more than five years for CIT purposes.

The investment gains will be realised when the investment agreement becomes effective and relevant registrations have proceeded.)

Tax treatment for the shares of the investee obtained

Tax basis of the shares obtained = the original tax basis of the invested assets + investment gain realised each year

(The tax basis should be adjusted each year in line with the investment gain realised.)

Investee

Tax basis of the non-monetary assets obtained = FMV

If the investor later transfers the shares obtained or retracts those investments or is liquidated, the above tax deferral treatment is terminated and all the gains are immediately subject to CIT.

Circular 106 also adds that investment with non-monetary assets includes situations when a new PRC resident enterprise is established with non-monetary assets or an existing PRC resident enterprise is injected with such assets. When the entity conducts investment with non-monetary assets and it also qualifies for special restructuring under Circular 59, the entity can elect such special tax treatment stipulated in Circular 59.

Both Circular 109 and Circular 116 took effect January 1 2014 and are valid for cases unresolved before the issuance date of the circulars.

Khoonming Ho (khoonming.ho@kpmg.com)

KPMG, China and Hong Kong SAR

Tel: +86 (10) 8508 7082

Lewis Lu (lewis.lu@kpmg.com)

KPMG, Central China

Tel: +86 (21) 2212 3421

more across site & shared bottom lb ros

More from across our site

SF: Germany has forgotten to think about digital reporting requirements, a WTS partner claimed at ITR’s Indirect Tax Forum 2025
E-invoicing is currently characterised by dynamism, with fragmentation acting as a key catalyst for increasing interoperability, says Aida Cavalera of the International Observatory on eInvoicing
Pillar two and the US tax system ‘could work in harmony’, Scott Levine tells ITR in an exclusive interview to mark his arrival at Baker McKenzie
Peter White, who has a tax debt of A$2 million, has been banned for five years from seeking registration with Australia’s Tax Practitioners Board (TPB)
Wopke Hoekstra’s comments followed US measures aimed against ‘unfair foreign taxes’; in other news, Grant Thornton and Holland & Knight made key tax partner hires
An Administrative Review Tribunal ruling last month in Australia v Alcoa represents a 'concerning trend' for the tax authority, one expert tells ITR
A recent decision underlines that Indian courts are more willing to look beyond just legal compliance and examine whether foreign investment structures have real business substance
Following his Liberal Party’s election victory, one source expects Mark Carney to follow the international consensus on pillar two, as experts assess the new administration
A German economics professor was reportedly ‘irritated’ by how the Finnish ministry of finance used his data
Countries that care about the fair taxation of tech multinationals and equitable global distribution of wealth should back the UN’s tax framework, writes economist Abdelmalek Riad
Gift this article