Chile: Tax credit regarding Chilean sourced income subject to withholding tax in a foreign jurisdiction

International Tax Review is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Garden, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2025

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Chile: Tax credit regarding Chilean sourced income subject to withholding tax in a foreign jurisdiction

pelegri.jpg

burrull.jpg

Loreto Pelegrí


Ignacio Burrull

On September 29 2014, Law No. 20.780 was published in the Chilean Official Gazette ("the Tax Reform"), which introduced several modifications to the Chilean taxation system. Among other modifications, and as a useful complement of a previous reform made which entered into force on January 1 2014, which increased the amount of credit that could be used for taxes paid abroad, either from treaty or non-treaty countries, and also established that the credit balances could be carried forward until its full extinction (while the previous regulation did not allow its use in case of tax losses), the Tax Reform introduced a subtle yet relevant modification to articles 41 A and 41 C of the Chilean Income Tax Law (Chilean ITL), which contains various provisions that aim to avoid international double taxation.

In fact, before the Tax Reform, said articles established that Chilean resident or Chilean domiciled taxpayers who obtained incomes from abroad were allowed to use a foreign tax credit. A contrario sensu, the Chilean IRS, interpreted in several rulings that a Chilean entity receiving Chilean-sourced income subject to withholding taxes in a foreign jurisdiction (for example, remuneration for services rendered in Chile to a non-domiciled entity) was not allowed to use a foreign tax credit.

The Tax Reform modified the heading of said articles, eliminating the phrase 'from abroad' from its content. The purpose of this elimination is to widen the scope of application of the provisions that seek to avoid the double taxation of incomes, since, before this elimination; the aforementioned provisions were only applicable to foreign-sourced income that had been taxed abroad as well.

In such a situation, if a Chilean resident or Chilean domiciled taxpayer had to render a service to a non-resident or non-domiciled taxpayer, it was more convenient to travel abroad and render it outside Chile, so that the income received was considered as foreign income, hence not subject, as a general rule, to Chilean taxes.

Accordingly, as per the new heading of articles 41 A and 41 C, the provisions that aim to avoid the international double taxation are now, also, applicable to incomes that fulfill the following cumulative conditions:

  • Obtained in Chile or abroad; and

  • Have been taxed abroad.

Therefore, with this new provision, the Chilean resident or Chilean domiciled taxpayer, in the example above, will be able to use, with certain limits, as a credit against the corporate income tax (CIT) levied in Chile, the taxes paid abroad for the income received for the rendering of its services, even if they are performed within Chilean territory (Chilean-sourced income).

As per the modification explained above, the Tax Reform, which was vastly criticised by many sectors of the Chilean economy, envisaged a change that is actually beneficial for taxpayers, allowing, and promoting, an easier and more transparent way to continue or expand its operations abroad.

Loreto Pelegrí (loreto.pelegri@cl.pwc.com) and Ignacio Burrull (ignacio.burrull@cl.pwc.com)

PwC

Website: www.pwc.cl

more across site & shared bottom lb ros

More from across our site

ITR’s data has highlighted the US firm’s ambition to become America’s ‘premier’ tax player via a concerted partner recruitment strategy
Jaap Zwaan’s arrival continues a recent streak of A&M Tax investing in the region; in other news, the US and Japan struck a deal that significantly lowered tariff rates
In a world where international tax concepts rely on human activity, Leonard Wagenaar poses existential questions about the future of such ideas when AI is ever-present
France v Axa provides a practical illustration of how the burden of proof is applied in TP matters under French law, ITR also heard
In an exclusive interview with ITR, Ian Gary calls for a central public CbCR database and bemoans the US’s lack of involvement in international tax transparency
Reckitt Benckiser is to divest its Essential Home business, which includes more than 70 brands, to private equity firm Advent International
In the first of a new series of weekly opinion pieces, ITR Editor Tom Baker reflects on the OECD’s attempts to sanitise the US’s brazen pillar two negotiations
The threat of 50% tariffs on Brazilian goods coincides with new Brazilian legal powers to adopt retaliatory economic measures, local experts tell ITR
The country’s chancellor appears to have backtracked from previous pillar two scepticism; in other news, Donald Trump threatened Russia with 100% tariffs
In its latest G20 update, the OECD also revealed tense discussions with the US where the ‘significant threat’ of Section 899 was highlighted
Gift this article