Poland: VATable and non-VATable transactions in Poland – allocation of input VAT

International Tax Review is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Garden, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2025

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Poland: VATable and non-VATable transactions in Poland – allocation of input VAT

Szafarowska-Marta

Marta Szafarowska

Those dealing with VAT in other EU countries are surprised that, so far in Poland, taxpayers making both VATable transactions as well as activities that do not fall within the VAT regime, are entitled to deduct the whole amount of VAT resulting from purchases of goods and services where direct allocation to VATable and non-VATable activities is not possible.

The above solution has been particularly attractive to municipalities, but also to certain kinds of holding companies. However, to put an end to this situation, the Ministry of Finance has proposed new provisions that come into force from January 2016.

Under the new provisions, taxpayers performing both VATable transactions and activities that do not fall within the VAT scope will be obliged to deduct input VAT in line with the proportion representing the allocation of goods and services to those streams of activities. Then, once input VAT allocated only to VATable activities is established, it will be deducted on a pro rata basis (representing allocation of purchases to supplies subject to VAT and exempt).

The new provisions provide several methods to establish the initial proportion – the taxpayer should choose the most appropriate one for his individual situation. The methods refer to: (i) average number of employees dealing only with VATable transactions to average total number of employees; (ii) average number of hours devoted only to VATable transactions to total number of hours; (iii) turnover generated from VATable transactions to total revenues; and (iv) the surface of the building used for VATable transactions to total surface of the premises.

Throughout the year, taxpayers will be deducting VAT based on the initial proportion, established based on data available from the previous year. After the year-end the actual proportion will be calculated and the deduction corrected.

In general, those new rules will affect municipalities and public bodies performing also VATable transaction. Nevertheless, VAT deduction by certain types of holding companies may also be affected.

Marta Szafarowska (marta.szafarowska@mddp.pl)

MDDP

Tel: +48 22 322 68 88

Website: www.mddp.pl

more across site & shared bottom lb ros

More from across our site

ITR’s data has highlighted the US firm’s ambition to become America’s ‘premier’ tax player via a concerted partner recruitment strategy
Jaap Zwaan’s arrival continues a recent streak of A&M Tax investing in the region; in other news, the US and Japan struck a deal that significantly lowered tariff rates
In a world where international tax concepts rely on human activity, Leonard Wagenaar poses existential questions about the future of such ideas when AI is ever-present
France v Axa provides a practical illustration of how the burden of proof is applied in TP matters under French law, ITR also heard
In an exclusive interview with ITR, Ian Gary calls for a central public CbCR database and bemoans the US’s lack of involvement in international tax transparency
Reckitt Benckiser is to divest its Essential Home business, which includes more than 70 brands, to private equity firm Advent International
In the first of a new series of weekly opinion pieces, ITR Editor Tom Baker reflects on the OECD’s attempts to sanitise the US’s brazen pillar two negotiations
The threat of 50% tariffs on Brazilian goods coincides with new Brazilian legal powers to adopt retaliatory economic measures, local experts tell ITR
The country’s chancellor appears to have backtracked from previous pillar two scepticism; in other news, Donald Trump threatened Russia with 100% tariffs
In its latest G20 update, the OECD also revealed tense discussions with the US where the ‘significant threat’ of Section 899 was highlighted
Gift this article