Poland: VATable and non-VATable transactions in Poland – allocation of input VAT

International Tax Review is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Garden, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2026

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Poland: VATable and non-VATable transactions in Poland – allocation of input VAT

Szafarowska-Marta

Marta Szafarowska

Those dealing with VAT in other EU countries are surprised that, so far in Poland, taxpayers making both VATable transactions as well as activities that do not fall within the VAT regime, are entitled to deduct the whole amount of VAT resulting from purchases of goods and services where direct allocation to VATable and non-VATable activities is not possible.

The above solution has been particularly attractive to municipalities, but also to certain kinds of holding companies. However, to put an end to this situation, the Ministry of Finance has proposed new provisions that come into force from January 2016.

Under the new provisions, taxpayers performing both VATable transactions and activities that do not fall within the VAT scope will be obliged to deduct input VAT in line with the proportion representing the allocation of goods and services to those streams of activities. Then, once input VAT allocated only to VATable activities is established, it will be deducted on a pro rata basis (representing allocation of purchases to supplies subject to VAT and exempt).

The new provisions provide several methods to establish the initial proportion – the taxpayer should choose the most appropriate one for his individual situation. The methods refer to: (i) average number of employees dealing only with VATable transactions to average total number of employees; (ii) average number of hours devoted only to VATable transactions to total number of hours; (iii) turnover generated from VATable transactions to total revenues; and (iv) the surface of the building used for VATable transactions to total surface of the premises.

Throughout the year, taxpayers will be deducting VAT based on the initial proportion, established based on data available from the previous year. After the year-end the actual proportion will be calculated and the deduction corrected.

In general, those new rules will affect municipalities and public bodies performing also VATable transaction. Nevertheless, VAT deduction by certain types of holding companies may also be affected.

Marta Szafarowska (marta.szafarowska@mddp.pl)

MDDP

Tel: +48 22 322 68 88

Website: www.mddp.pl

more across site & shared bottom lb ros

More from across our site

With a stark divergence between MNEs that prepared early and those rushing to catch up, advisers must remain agile with all manner of compliance risks
The EU agreed new cooperative and investigative measures to tackle VAT fraud, while Hungary faced legal action and Lavez Coutinho expanded its indirect tax team
The arrival of a team from Brazilian rival Costa Tavares Paes Advogados brings SiqueiraCastro’s tax headcount to seven partners and 30 associates
CSR initiatives can sometimes venture into virtue signalling, but Ryan’s tax literacy event for schoolchildren was a genuine and necessary endeavour
Grant Thornton advanced plans to integrate its Australian firm into its US arm, as tax developments spanned law firm hires, aviation levies and digital services taxes
A new focus on early intervention and increased AI use is transforming how tax authorities are approaching TP audits, though capacity-constrained jurisdictions risk falling behind
The French administration has used AI to detect undeclared swimming pools and verandas but always includes a human in the loop, the AI in Tax Forum heard
The UK tax authority’s deputy director of large business also reassured taxpayers that HMRC will not ‘nitpick’ returns
Sucafina’s tax chief was speaking at the ITR Pillar 2 Forum in London alongside experts from HMRC and other organisations
India’s Supreme Court rattled cross‑border structuring with its Tiger Global ruling. Subsequent rule changes narrowed the impact, but significant risks around GAAR, substance and treaty access persist
Gift this article