Poland: VATable and non-VATable transactions in Poland – allocation of input VAT

International Tax Review is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 4 Bouverie Street, London, EC4Y 8AX

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2025

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Poland: VATable and non-VATable transactions in Poland – allocation of input VAT

Szafarowska-Marta

Marta Szafarowska

Those dealing with VAT in other EU countries are surprised that, so far in Poland, taxpayers making both VATable transactions as well as activities that do not fall within the VAT regime, are entitled to deduct the whole amount of VAT resulting from purchases of goods and services where direct allocation to VATable and non-VATable activities is not possible.

The above solution has been particularly attractive to municipalities, but also to certain kinds of holding companies. However, to put an end to this situation, the Ministry of Finance has proposed new provisions that come into force from January 2016.

Under the new provisions, taxpayers performing both VATable transactions and activities that do not fall within the VAT scope will be obliged to deduct input VAT in line with the proportion representing the allocation of goods and services to those streams of activities. Then, once input VAT allocated only to VATable activities is established, it will be deducted on a pro rata basis (representing allocation of purchases to supplies subject to VAT and exempt).

The new provisions provide several methods to establish the initial proportion – the taxpayer should choose the most appropriate one for his individual situation. The methods refer to: (i) average number of employees dealing only with VATable transactions to average total number of employees; (ii) average number of hours devoted only to VATable transactions to total number of hours; (iii) turnover generated from VATable transactions to total revenues; and (iv) the surface of the building used for VATable transactions to total surface of the premises.

Throughout the year, taxpayers will be deducting VAT based on the initial proportion, established based on data available from the previous year. After the year-end the actual proportion will be calculated and the deduction corrected.

In general, those new rules will affect municipalities and public bodies performing also VATable transaction. Nevertheless, VAT deduction by certain types of holding companies may also be affected.

Marta Szafarowska (marta.szafarowska@mddp.pl)

MDDP

Tel: +48 22 322 68 88

Website: www.mddp.pl

more across site & shared bottom lb ros

More from across our site

SF: Germany has forgotten to think about digital reporting requirements, a WTS partner claimed at ITR’s Indirect Tax Forum 2025
E-invoicing is currently characterised by dynamism, with fragmentation acting as a key catalyst for increasing interoperability, says Aida Cavalera of the International Observatory on eInvoicing
Pillar two and the US tax system ‘could work in harmony’, Scott Levine tells ITR in an exclusive interview to mark his arrival at Baker McKenzie
Peter White, who has a tax debt of A$2 million, has been banned for five years from seeking registration with Australia’s Tax Practitioners Board (TPB)
Wopke Hoekstra’s comments followed US measures aimed against ‘unfair foreign taxes’; in other news, Grant Thornton and Holland & Knight made key tax partner hires
An Administrative Review Tribunal ruling last month in Australia v Alcoa represents a 'concerning trend' for the tax authority, one expert tells ITR
A recent decision underlines that Indian courts are more willing to look beyond just legal compliance and examine whether foreign investment structures have real business substance
Following his Liberal Party’s election victory, one source expects Mark Carney to follow the international consensus on pillar two, as experts assess the new administration
A German economics professor was reportedly ‘irritated’ by how the Finnish ministry of finance used his data
Countries that care about the fair taxation of tech multinationals and equitable global distribution of wealth should back the UN’s tax framework, writes economist Abdelmalek Riad
Gift this article