Germany: Exemption to Germany’s change-in-ownership rules expanded

International Tax Review is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 4 Bouverie Street, London, EC4Y 8AX

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2025

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Germany: Exemption to Germany’s change-in-ownership rules expanded

Linn-Alexander
Braun-Thorsten

Alexander Linn

Thorsten Braun

The German tax reform 2015, published in the federal gazette on November 5 2015, includes a new exemption from the strict change-in-ownership rules that result in the forfeiture of tax loss carryforwards.

According to the change-in-ownership rules introduced in the 2008 business tax reform, a direct or indirect transfer of more than 25% of the shares of an entity to an acquirer will result in a pro rata forfeiture of tax loss carryforwards; a transfer of more than 50% of the shares will result in a complete forfeiture of tax loss carryforwards.

For transfers after December 31 2009, an exemption for intra-group reorganisations applied in cases where the 'same person' held directly or indirectly a 100% participation in both the transferring and the purchasing entity. However, the exemption did not apply to a share transfer from or to the ultimate parent entity and where the ultimate parent entity was not held by the 'same person', which would be the case, for example, for any stock exchange-listed company.

The tax reform 2015 extends the intra-group exemption rule to apply to changes of shareholders within a 100% controlled group, including the situation where an ultimate parent is the transferring or the purchasing entity and is held by more than one person. Additionally, the ultimate shareholder can be a partnership or an individual; this had been an area of uncertainty and the Federal Ministry of Finance had issued a draft decree that would not allow a partnership or individual to be the ultimate shareholder.

The new rules apply retroactively to share transfers taking place after December 31 2009, thus allowing taxpayers to benefit in cases where tax losses were already forfeited under the previous wording of the law.

Alexander Linn (allinn@deloitte.de) and Thorsten Braun (tbraun@deloitte.de)

Deloitte

Tel: +49 89 29036 8558 and +49 69 75695 6444

Website: www.deloitte.de

more across site & shared bottom lb ros

More from across our site

SF: Germany has forgotten to think about digital reporting requirements, a WTS partner claimed at ITR’s Indirect Tax Forum 2025
E-invoicing is currently characterised by dynamism, with fragmentation acting as a key catalyst for increasing interoperability, says Aida Cavalera of the International Observatory on eInvoicing
Pillar two and the US tax system ‘could work in harmony’, Scott Levine tells ITR in an exclusive interview to mark his arrival at Baker McKenzie
Peter White, who has a tax debt of A$2 million, has been banned for five years from seeking registration with Australia’s Tax Practitioners Board (TPB)
Wopke Hoekstra’s comments followed US measures aimed against ‘unfair foreign taxes’; in other news, Grant Thornton and Holland & Knight made key tax partner hires
An Administrative Review Tribunal ruling last month in Australia v Alcoa represents a 'concerning trend' for the tax authority, one expert tells ITR
A recent decision underlines that Indian courts are more willing to look beyond just legal compliance and examine whether foreign investment structures have real business substance
Following his Liberal Party’s election victory, one source expects Mark Carney to follow the international consensus on pillar two, as experts assess the new administration
A German economics professor was reportedly ‘irritated’ by how the Finnish ministry of finance used his data
Countries that care about the fair taxation of tech multinationals and equitable global distribution of wealth should back the UN’s tax framework, writes economist Abdelmalek Riad
Gift this article