Chile: Chilean investors should check their tax residence

International Tax Review is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Garden, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2025

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Chile: Chilean investors should check their tax residence

intl-updates-small.jpg

Taxpayers will be subject to an Attributed Income System or a Partially Integrated System from 2017 and onwards, changing the way corporate income tax is paid in Chile.

campos.jpg
vivallo.jpg

Germán
Campos

Martín
Vivallo

Law No. 20.780 introduced the two alternative taxation systems and taxpayers will be subject to one of those systems. The legislation introduced several modifications to the earlier Tax Reform Law (Law No. 20.780) that was published in the Chilean Official Gazette on September 29 2014.

Under the Attributed Income System, as a general rule, the corporate income tax of 25% must be paid in the year in which the income is generated, and the profit is immediately attributed to the shareholders, who must pay their final taxes (up to 35%) in that same year, even if there has been no effective distribution. The corporate income tax paid can be fully credited against the final taxes and, therefore, the maximum combined tax burden would amount to 35%. Also, the shareholders may be subject to personal income tax when certain distribution exceeds the attributed income.

Under the Partially Integrated System, taxpayers will be subject to corporate income tax (Impuesto de Primera Categoría) at a rate of 27% from 2018 (25.5% during 2017). When profits are distributed to shareholders, non-resident shareholders will be subject to additional withholding tax (Impuesto Adicional) at a rate of 35%. Being a (partially) integrated system, the corporate income tax paid may be credited against the additional tax, but only for 65% of the amount paid. Therefore, the total tax burden would amount to 44.45%.

However, the aforementioned 65% credit may be increased to a 100% in cases where the non-resident shareholder is a tax resident in a country with a double taxation treaty (DTA) signed and currently in force with Chile. In this case, the total tax burden would amount to 35%.

The difference between countries with a DTA signed and currently in force with Chile and those without it becomes evident.

The impact on foreign investors

Law 20.780, which introduced the two alternative taxation systems, contains a provisional rule that will allow foreign investors resident in a country that has a DTA signed, but not yet in force, with Chile (such as the US, China, Japan, and Italy, among others) to benefit from the full credit against their final tax until 2019.

For investors who are tax residents of a country with which Chile does not have a DTA, they may have to consider some alternative solutions. One of the possible solutions could be to determine the value of migrating the effective place of management to a country that holds a DTA with Chile.

When possible, this could be a very useful solution. However, the 2014 Tax Reform Law introduced a general anti-avoidance rule (GAAR) to the Chilean legislation, which may prevent foreign investors from migrating. Moreover, the DTAs signed by Chile also contain anti-abuse clauses.

Fortunately, the Chilean tax authority issued a ruling which, broadly speaking, stated that a migration as the one mentioned above should not, in principle, be subject to GAAR.

The taxation system that a taxpayer could choose is not a trivial matter. It depends, among other things, on the situation of their shareholders. Foreign investors should analyse these matters and determine whether they are in the right position to face the future challenges and operations of their investments in Chile.

Germán Campos (german.campos@cl.pwc.com) and Martín Vivallo (martin.vivallo@cl.pwc.com)

PwC

Website: www.pwc.cl

more across site & shared bottom lb ros

More from across our site

A lack of commitment from major jurisdictions and the associated compliance burden are obstacles facing the OECD initiative
Richard Gregg is no longer fit and proper to be a tax agent, said the TPB; in other news, MHA completed its acquisition of Baker Tilly South-East Europe
Recent Indian case law emphasises the importance of economic substance over mere legal form in evaluating tax implications, say authors from Khaitan & Co
PepsiCo was represented by PwC, while the ATO was advised by MinterEllison, an Australian-headquartered law firm
Three tax experts dissect the impact of a 30% tariff that has shaken up trade relations between South Africa and the US
Awards
ITR is delighted to reveal all the shortlisted nominees for the 2025 Americas Tax Awards
As we move into an era of ‘substance over form’, determining the fundamental nature of a particular instrument is key when evaluating the tax implications of selling hybrid securities
It stands in stark contrast to a mere 1% increase in firmwide revenue since last year
It follows a court case concerning a Freedom of Information request lodged by the founder of a software company
After years of deafening silence, the UK tax authority is taking overdue action against corporates that fail to prevent the facilitation of tax evasion
Gift this article