New Brazilian rules on ultimate beneficiary disclosure

International Tax Review is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Garden, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2025

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

New Brazilian rules on ultimate beneficiary disclosure

The Brazilian Internal Revenue Service (IRS) has issued Normative Instruction (NI) No. 1.634 with the purpose of updating the main regulatory provisions regarding the Corporate Taxpayer Registry (CNPJ).

This procedure is periodically repeated by the IRS and that usually does not attract much taxpayer attention, as it only encompasses certain bureaucratic provisions for complying with the CNPJ registry. This time, however, the introduction of an unusual set of rules on May 9 2016 surprised Brazilian taxpayers.

Among the habitual bureaucratic rules, the IRS introduced an obligation for entities registered with the CNPJ to disclose information on individuals authorised to legally represent them, as well as the chain of corporate interest up to individual deemed as its final beneficiary – ie individuals that directly or indirectly own, control or significantly influence the entity, or the individual on behalf of whom a transaction is conducted. For final beneficiary purposes, “significant influence” is defined as ownership of more than 25% of the entity capital or the exercise of preponderance in corporate resolutions and the power to elect a majority of entity's management, even without controlling it.

As broadly stated by the IRS, the main purpose of this new set of rules is to supply Brazilian authorities with information on the real economic beneficiaries of Brazilian entities’ proceeds, even if they are domiciled abroad, and therefore to provide a mechanism against corruption, money laundering and tax evasion.

However, apart from its main goal, the final beneficiary provisions may also trigger a series of collateral consequences for Brazilian entities, as well for its foreign investors, related to such subjects as taxation on remittance of capital abroad, tax benefits for Brazilian investments funds held by foreign investors and acquisition of rural land in Brazil, among others. As a result, foreign investors are advised to carefully verify any potential impacts of NI 1.634/16 for their specific situation.

Among the few exceptions of the final beneficiary rule are:

-       Publicly-held companies domiciled in Brazil or in jurisdictions that require public disclosure of relevant shareholders, and are not legally considered as tax havens;

-       certain non-profit entities;

-       multilateral organisations;

-       government agencies;

-       pension funds, and a few others.

The obligation to comply with NI 1.634/16 begins on January 1 2017 for entities not yet registered on the CNPJ. For all other cases, the necessary information must be disclosed upon the next CNPJ registry update no longer than December 31, 2018. Failure to comply with these rules will result in the suspension of the CNPJ registry.

This article was prepared by Luiz Felipe Centano Ferraz, partner at Mattos Filho, International Tax Review's tax disputes correspondent in Brazil.

more across site & shared bottom lb ros

More from across our site

Firms are making use of inventories and ample profit margins to avoid or absorb the initial impact of higher tariffs, an OECD report found
While UN proposals to shift airline taxation from a residence-based system to a source-state one are not set in stone, ex-British Airways CEO Willie Walsh warns they would increase costs and complexity
Von Wobeser y Sierra’s head of tax shares best practices for resolving tax controversy and touts his firm’s founding partner as an exemplar of legal practice
ITR concludes its analysis of World Tax’s rankings for 2026 by highlighting the firms that stood out most on a global scale
Experts from law firm Kennedys outline the key tax disputes trends set to define 2026, ranging from increased enforcement to continued tariff drama and AI usage
They also warned against an ‘unnecessary duplication of efforts’ in UN tax convention negotiations; in other news, White & Case has hired Freshfields’ former French tax head
Awards
Submit your nominations to this year's WIBL EMEA Awards by 16 February 2026
Defending loss situations in TP is not about denying the existence of losses but about showing, through proactive measures, that the losses reflect genuine commercial realities
Further empowerment of HMRC enforcement has been praised, but the pre-Budget OBR leak was described as ‘shambolic’
Michel Braun of WTS Digital reviews ITR’s inaugural AI in tax event, and concludes that AI will enhance, not replace, the tax professional
Gift this article