Germany: Fiscal Court rules substance requirements under Cadbury-Schweppes exception to CFC taxation

International Tax Review is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Garden, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2026

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Germany: Fiscal Court rules substance requirements under Cadbury-Schweppes exception to CFC taxation

Linn-Alexander
Braun

Alexander Linn

Thorsten Braun

Germany's controlled foreign corporation (CFC) rules apply to CFCs earning passive income that is taxed at a rate of less than 25%. However, the rules do not apply to subsidiaries located in the EU/EEA if the Germany taxpayer can demonstrate that the subsidiary carries on a genuine economic activity in its state of residence (Cadbury-Schweppes exception, see ECJ, C-196/04). There is scant case law on what constitutes a genuine economic activity for these purposes.

In a recent case before the Lower Fiscal Court of Münster, a Cyprus-resident subsidiary of a German parent company had office space available and one resident employee in Cyprus. The Cyprus entity was engaged in the acquisition of publishing rights for Russian and Ukrainian books; the authors contracted with the Cyprus entity, which then granted an intercompany licence for an arm's-length royalty paid to group subsidiaries in Russia and Ukraine. There was contact between the authors and the publishing group through the local subsidiaries, but the authors contracted only with the Cyprus entity. The royalties were considered passive income and were benefited from low taxation in Cyprus.

The Münster court held that interposing the Cyprus entity to receive the royalties paid by the Russian and Ukrainian subsidiaries instead of the German parent constituted a wholly artificial arrangement because the entity did not conduct a genuine economic activity in Cyprus. The court held that the entity did not use the local resources and the German taxpayer failed to present sufficient business reasons why the licensing activities had to be performed in Cyprus (rather than Germany). Some of the court's conclusions regarding the scope of the EU freedom of establishment and the impact of outsourcing seem questionable. As the decision was appealed, the Federal Tax Court will have the final say on the issue (pending case reference I R 94/15).

Alexander Linn (allinn@deloitte.de); and Thorsten Braun (tbraun@deloitte.de)

Deloitte

Tel: +49 89 29036 8558 and +49 69 75695 6444

Website: www.deloitte.de

more across site & shared bottom lb ros

More from across our site

Partners are divided on Italy vs PDM D’s analytical depth, evidentiary standards, and what the judgment signals for future intra-group financing cases
As GCCs increasingly become strategic hubs, multinationals face heightened risks around permanent establishment and place of effective management
While all options presented ‘drawbacks’, European Commission tax leader Wopke Hoekstra said the controversial US carve-out deal has ‘many benefits’
From tech preparations to competitiveness concerns, Tax Systems’ Russell Gammon addresses the most pressing client considerations arising from the SbS deal
Despite estimates that the US/OECD agreement will cost countries billions, the Fair Tax Foundation’s Paul Monaghan believes the deal is a ‘necessary evil’
The firm’s eye-catching UK launch is a major statement of intent, but it will face stern opposition in its quest to be the top global tax player
The postponement came after industry representatives flagged implementation issues with the registration regime; in other news, firms made key tax partner additions
Despite the increased yield, the time taken to resolve enquiries was at a six-year high, new HMRC statistics have revealed
The High Court’s dismissal of barrister Setu Kamal’s legal challenge represents the first successful strike-out under a new law on SLAPPs
IP lawyers, who say they are encouraging clients to build up ‘tariff resilience’, should treat the risks posed by recent orders as a core consideration in cross-border licensing
Gift this article