China: China’s new VAT rates and rules across all industries

International Tax Review is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Garden, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2025

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

China: China’s new VAT rates and rules across all industries

ho-khoonming.jpg
lu-lewis.jpg

Khoonming Ho

Lewis Lu

On March 24 2016, China's Ministry of Finance and the State Administration of Taxation jointly issued Circular Cai Shui [2016] 36 (Circular 36) which contains the Value Added Tax (VAT) rates and rules applicable to the expansion of China's VAT system to several key sectors such as real estate and construction, financial services, and lifestyle services, which take effect from May 1 2016.

China's indirect tax system has, for many years now, been a bifurcated system with VAT broadly applying to the goods sectors, and Business Tax (BT) applying to the services sectors. Given that BT is essentially a tax on business which cascades throughout a supply chain, and is generally regarded as being an inefficient form of taxation, the Chinese government has been embarking upon a programme of progressively replacing BT with VAT since 2012. While the early stage of the VAT reform programme involved the VAT rules for certain sectors being implemented progressively on a province-by-province basis, in more recent times the implementation of VAT has been done nationwide on an industry-by-industry basis.

This final stage represents a 'big bang' approach, with all remaining sectors transitioning from BT to VAT nationwide with effect from May 1 2016, and they are:

  • Real estate and construction;

  • Financial services; and

  • Lifestyle services, which encompasses hospitality, food and beverage, healthcare, education, cultural and entertainment services, and a general residual category of any other services which are still subject to BT.

These three key industries represent, in policy terms, the most difficult industries to apply a VAT to, and moreover, in financial terms they are the most significant industries contributing to local government revenues. From a policy perspective, they can present challenges in applying a VAT to their services, given that:

  • the value added in financial services can be difficult to measure on a transaction-by-transaction basis, which explains why most countries exempt them from a VAT;

  • gains from real estate transactions may arise from passive activity (that is, simple increases in property values), or from actively improving the property, such as building and construction. The real estate industry also affects a broad range of stakeholders, from experienced developers, to investors, to speculators and private individuals. It is also subject to many other types of taxation already; and

  • lifestyle services can be consumed for business purposes or for private purposes, and differentiating between them can be difficult. In many cases they are also primarily cash based businesses where tax compliance may not be high.

When fully implemented, China's VAT system will be one of the broadest-based systems among more than 160 countries in the world which have now implemented a VAT (or equivalent tax). China's VAT system will be unique by international standards in applying VAT to virtually all financial services (including interest income), and in applying VAT to real estate transactions involving not only B2B and B2C transactions, but C2C as well – an outcome not known to exist in any other country. It would not be surprising to see other governments follow China's lead and expand their VAT systems, especially if China is able to implement these changes successfully.

For more insight into the BT2VAT initiative, visit www.internationaltaxreview.com for information put together for ITR by the Chinese SAT and Minister Wang Jun.

Khoonming Ho (khoonming.ho@kpmg.com) and Lewis Lu (lewis.lu@kpmg.com)

KPMG China

Tel: +86 (10) 8508 7082 and +86 (21) 2212 3421

Website: www.kpmg.com/cn

more across site & shared bottom lb ros

More from across our site

ITR’s data has highlighted the US firm’s ambition to become America’s ‘premier’ tax player via a concerted partner recruitment strategy
Jaap Zwaan’s arrival continues a recent streak of A&M Tax investing in the region; in other news, the US and Japan struck a deal that significantly lowered tariff rates
In a world where international tax concepts rely on human activity, Leonard Wagenaar poses existential questions about the future of such ideas when AI is ever-present
France v Axa provides a practical illustration of how the burden of proof is applied in TP matters under French law, ITR also heard
In an exclusive interview with ITR, Ian Gary calls for a central public CbCR database and bemoans the US’s lack of involvement in international tax transparency
Reckitt Benckiser is to divest its Essential Home business, which includes more than 70 brands, to private equity firm Advent International
In the first of a new series of weekly opinion pieces, ITR Editor Tom Baker reflects on the OECD’s attempts to sanitise the US’s brazen pillar two negotiations
The threat of 50% tariffs on Brazilian goods coincides with new Brazilian legal powers to adopt retaliatory economic measures, local experts tell ITR
The country’s chancellor appears to have backtracked from previous pillar two scepticism; in other news, Donald Trump threatened Russia with 100% tariffs
In its latest G20 update, the OECD also revealed tense discussions with the US where the ‘significant threat’ of Section 899 was highlighted
Gift this article