South Africa: Proposed income tax amendments and tax treaty developments

International Tax Review is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Garden, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2026

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

South Africa: Proposed income tax amendments and tax treaty developments

intl-updates-small.jpg

The draft Taxation Laws Amendment Bill (DTLAB), released for comment on July 19 2017, contains a proposal to include a new section in the Income Tax Act to address structures that, in the view of the South African Revenue Service (SARS), are aimed at avoiding dividends tax on distributions made to foreign shareholders by local companies.

bennett.jpg

Anne

Bennett



Distributions made out of 'contributed tax capital' (CTC), a notional concept that exists only for tax purposes, do not attract South Africa dividends tax. CTC is determined separately in relation to each class of share and equals the consideration received for the issue of such shares, reduced by CTC repayments made by the company on or after January 1 2011.

Any distribution made will automatically qualify for tax purposes as a dividend, subject to dividends tax (irrespective of the accounting treatment), unless the company's directors elect to treat it as a repayment of CTC, in which case the distribution will qualify as a tax-free 'return of capital'.

The proposed amendment targets two structures that result in the creation of CTC and hence increase a company's ability to make tax-free distributions. The first involves a non-resident entity disposing of its shares in a local subsidiary (SA SubCo) to a newly interposed South African company (SA HoldCo) in exchange for the issue of new shares. The second structure involves a non-resident subscribing in cash for shares in a resident company (SA HoldCo) whereafter SA HoldCo applies the subscription proceeds to purchase shares in another company that is part of the same group of companies as the non-resident subscriber and SA Holdco. The percentage threshold for a group of companies in this provision is reduced to 50% as opposed to the normal 70% threshold.

In both these scenarios, it is proposed to limit the new CTC created in SA Holdco to an amount equal to the CTC attaching to the shares acquired by SA Holdco in the relevant transaction.

This section is proposed to come into operation on July 19 2017 and, if enacted, will apply to any shares issued on or after that date.

Most favoured nation

In a previous update, we discussed the binding ruling given by SARS, confirming that a zero rate of dividends tax applies to dividends distributed by South African companies to qualifying Swedish tax resident shareholders because of the most favoured nation provision (MFN) in the South Africa-Sweden treaty.

The Dutch High Court has recently handed down a judgment confirming that in its view, no dividends tax applies between residents of South Africa and residents of the Netherlands because of the MFN provision in the South Africa-Netherlands treaty read together with the MFN provision in the South Africa-Sweden treaty. Since South Africa has provided a zero rate of dividends tax to Swedish residents under a treaty concluded after the South Africa-Netherlands treaty, the MFN provision in the latter treaty requires the same zero rate to apply to distributions between South Africa and the Netherlands. This is good news for those local taxpayers currently seeking refunds from SARS of dividends tax previously withheld on distributions to Dutch shareholders, based on the legal arguments that have now been conclusively upheld in the Netherlands. It will be interesting to see what impact the Dutch case has on SARS, which has been contesting the refund claims.

Anne Bennett (anne.bennett@webberwentzel.com)

Webber Wentzel

Tel: +27 11 5305886

Website: www.webberwentzel.com

more across site & shared bottom lb ros

More from across our site

The firm has hired a team of private client lawyers from Withers to launch in New York and Connecticut, though ITR analysis suggests it faces stiff competition
The ability of tax authorities to receive and analyse data is becoming ‘quite advanced’, warns Stuart Lang, head of EY’s compliance co-sourcing solution
The Court of Appeal ruling clarifies that treaty benefits are not abusive where transactions are commercially driven, providing greater certainty on “main purpose” anti-avoidance tests
Despite the Netherlands featuring an unusual concentration of World Tax-ranked technology-led providers, sources believe there’s a long way to go to challenge the established players
Ethics seems to be playing a subservient role to an entitlement culture borne out of a pervasive ‘revenue at all costs’ mentality at the big four
Historical World Tax data suggests the ‘largest law firm merger in history’ may not pose a serious threat to the world's leading tax practices
The repeal of Libya’s statute of limitations and tougher enforcement leave taxpayers navigating a high-stakes choice between conciliation and litigation
All the tax partners elevated across the UK, US and Singapore were private client specialists, continuing a market trend of intense investment and competition
Rolf van de Velde, dubbed ‘an expert chosen by experts’, is tasked with scaling Reptune’s self-service compliance offering
The newly combined firm brings together more than 3,500 practitioners across 52 offices, with flagship hubs in Seattle, London, Sydney and New York.
Gift this article