Switzerland: Federal Council issues draft legislation on Tax Reform Proposal 17

International Tax Review is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Garden, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2025

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Switzerland: Federal Council issues draft legislation on Tax Reform Proposal 17

intl-updates-small.jpg
hess.jpg
zulauf.jpg

Jackie

Hess

René

Zulauf

On September 6 2017, the Swiss Federal Council issued the draft legislation for the Swiss Tax Reform Proposal 17 (STR 17, formerly known as Swiss Corporate Tax Reform III). The proposal that largely follows the recommendations of the steering committee represents a well-balanced and internationally competitive solution that would ensure that Switzerland stays an attractive location for multinationals and domestic companies alike, while at the same time providing an internationally aligned tax system that is in conformity with international standards, such as OECD BEPS and others.

The main proposed changes compared to CTR III include:

  • The notional interest deduction (NID) on federal and cantonal level is no longer part of the package;

  • The partial taxation for individual shareholders holding at least 10% would be increased to 70% from 60% on a federal level and mandatorily at least to 70% for all cantons; and

  • The combined tax relief for the patent box, the R&D super deduction and the amortisation from the step-up of hidden reserves due to a status change prior to STR 17 shall be limited to a maximum of 70% on a cantonal and communal level.

The main proposed elements of STR 17 include:

  • The sunset of all special corporate tax regimes, such as the mixed, domiciliary, holding and principal company regimes, as well as the Swiss finance branch regime;

  • The tax-privileged release of 'hidden reserves' for cantonal/communal tax purposes for companies transitioning out of tax-privileged cantonal tax regimes (such as mixed or holding companies) into ordinary taxation, with the intent to mitigate such effects by providing companies with a lower tax rate during a transition period of five years;

  • A reduction of the general cantonal/communal tax rates at the discretion of the individual cantons. Various cantons can be expected to be in the 12%–14% ETR bracket (effective combined federal/cantonal/communal tax rates);

  • The introduction of a mandatory cantonal-level patent box regime applicable to all patented intellectual property (IP) for which the research and development (R&D) spend occurred in Switzerland, based on the OECD modified nexus approach;

  • The introduction of cantonal R&D incentives in the form of deductions of up to 150% of qualifying R&D expenditure at the discretion of the individual cantons; and

  • A step-up of asset basis (including for self-created goodwill) for direct federal and cantonal/communal tax purposes upon the migration of a company or additional activities and functions into Switzerland.

Expected timeline

The proposed legislation will now enter the consultation procedure, which lasts for three months and under which the various stakeholders can weigh in on the legislation, so that the final version can be introduced into and voted on by the Swiss Parliament in its spring session of 2018. It seems currently unlikely that there would be a referendum (public vote) on the legislation, so that STR 17 could enter into force as soon as January 1 2020, but no later than January 1 2021.

Jackie Hess (jahess@deloitte.ch) and René Zulauf (rzulauf@deloitte.ch)

Deloitte

Tel: +41 58 279 6312 and +41 58 279 6359

Website: www.deloitte.ch

more across site & shared bottom lb ros

More from across our site

The choice facing governments is not whether to adopt AI in taxation, but how to do so in a way that upholds the principles of tax fairness, writes Neil Kelley
As ITR’s client data reveals discontent with German tax advisers’ cost management, Grant Thornton’s local TP head insists it’s a two-way street
Uncertainty isn’t always a bad thing, but it’s easy to see how the Trump administration’s IRS commissioner merry-go-round may serve to undermine business confidence
The EU defended its ‘sovereign right’ to impose the tax in the face of US tariff threats; in other news, the US deputy Treasury secretary resigned after just five months
Ascoria’s chief revenue officer shares her career wisdom garnered from the disparate worlds of tax technology, electric cables, radio DJing and more
Businesses no longer have a choice when it comes to tax technology transformation. Pavlo Boyko of TMF Group says the question is simply: sink or swim?
The firm is hunting for a senior TP manager in its quest to build a full-service practice in Indonesia, A&M Tax’s Jakarta head Jaap Zwaan tells ITR
With a new government in place, the evolving tax landscape presents both opportunities and challenges for taxpayers
Major economies have expressed concerns, with China arguing a US global minimum tax exemption would be a violation of the principle of fair competition – ITR understands
Senator Richard Colbeck told ITR he was concerned by the decision to let PwC Australia tender for government contracts again after a scandal-induced ban
Gift this article