Poland: Proposals will not allow investment cost deductions from operational revenue

International Tax Review is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Garden, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2026

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Poland: Proposals will not allow investment cost deductions from operational revenue

intl-updates-small.jpg
zamoyska.jpg

Magdalena Zamoyska

From 2018 Polish companies will not be allowed to deduct costs of their capital investment activity from operational revenue.

Currently, the Polish Corporate Income Tax Act does not provide for the obligation to calculate tax results separately on different forms of the taxpayers' operations. This means that, while defining taxable profit or loss, a given company should take into account all revenues and decrease them by the tax deductible cost of different types of its activity.

Planned changes to the Polish CIT Act introduce an obligation for the separate calculation of the tax result from capital gains. Capital gains are defined mainly as dividends, or dividends-like income, interest on profits from participating loans, revenues on the contributions in kind, disposal of shares and financial instruments but also the sale of receivables, even if receivables come from the operational activity.

The main motive to introduce separation of the tax result from capital gains is to prevail the unjustified decrease of operational profit by the cost of investment activity and financial operations, which according to the Polish Ministry of Development and Finance, may sometimes result from the non-genuine transactions aimed solely to decrease the taxable profit on the core business operations.

Starting from 2018, if a company earns profits on capital gains and operational activity, 19% CIT should be calculated on the sum of above profits (with exception to payment of dividends and dividends-like income, as in this case, tax is usually remitted by the distributor). If the company generates a loss on a given source of revenue in a tax year, this loss can only decrease profit from this source earned in the following years according to the rules outlined in CIT law.

At the date of writing this article, changes to the Polish CIT law are still a draft regulation subject to consultation. The amendments have been criticised because it is expected that they may discourage entrepreneurs from investment activity. On the other hand, the obligation to calculate the tax result for different types of revenue sources exists for many years in the Polish PIT Law. Additionally, this rule has been introduced to tax systems of numerous countries. However in Poland, the amendments are being introduced rapidly, without giving the companies sufficient time to adjust their operations and plans to the modified regulations.

Magdalena Zamoyska (magdalena.zamoyska@mddp.pl)

MDDP

Tel: +48 (22) 322 68 88

Website: www.mddp.pl

more across site & shared bottom lb ros

More from across our site

The levies extended beyond the president’s ‘legitimate reach’, the Supreme Court ruled
While Brazil’s consumption tax overhaul led to a short-term spike in tax advisory demand, we are now in a period of ‘normalisation’ marked by decreased recruitment
The expanded firm will comprise roughly 8,500 employees, including 550 partners; in other news, Paul Hastings and Macfarlanes made senior tax hires
Meanwhile, one expert highlights the importance of separating Venezuela’s tax authority from direct political control after ‘lost decades and isolation’
With PMK 108, Indonesia has upgraded its tax transparency regime for the digital era, focusing on data quality, governance, and cross border exchange rather than expanding regulatory reach
In a popular LinkedIn post, Jeremie Beitel encouraged firms to invest in junior talent even if it doesn’t lead to their loyalty, though recruiters offered ITR a mixed assessment
Advisers who do not register for the new regime in time could be prevented from interacting with HMRC, the tax authority said
Valid pillar two objectives are still intact after the side-by-side agreement, but whether the framework is now settled is ‘a $64,000 question’, Morrison Foerster’s tax chair told ITR
Ian Halligan previously led Baker Tilly’s international tax services in the US
Exclusive ITR data emphasises that DEI does not affect in-house buying decisions – and it’s nothing to do with the US president
Gift this article