Argentina: Protocol drastically changes tax treaty with Brazil

International Tax Review is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Garden, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2025

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Argentina: Protocol drastically changes tax treaty with Brazil

intl-updates-small.jpg
Rodriguez-Ignacio

Ignacio Rodríguez

On July 21 2017, a new amendment protocol to the double tax treaty (DTA) between Argentina and Brazil was signed. The subsequent exchange of instruments of ratification, which is expected to occur soon, will make it effective from January 1 of the year following the completion of this ratification process.

The tax treatment of Argentine transactions under the new protocol provisions with regards to interest, royalties and dividends will be as follows once the agreement is effective.

Interest

Domestic Argentinean tax law generally subjects interest payments on related-party loans to a foreign beneficial owner to a 35% withholding tax rate. However, under the amended DTA, interest payments on such loans paid to Brazilian beneficiaries should now be subject to a maximum withholding tax rate of 15%.

Although the DTA already contains non-discrimination provisions they do not override domestic thin capitalisation rules that establish a 2:1 debt-to-equity ratio. Therefore, taxpayers should still consider these rules if debt funding an Argentinean company from Brazil.

Royalties

As per the amended protocol, royalties and technical assistance payments made to a Brazilian beneficial owner should now find relief from domestic taxation being subject to maximum income tax withholding at 10% or 15% rates, as the case may be. Note that under domestic Argentine tax law royalties may be subject to withholding tax rates as high as 31.5%.

Although the treaty generally follows the OECD model, there are some deviations. For example, listing technical assistance services in Article 12 on royalties, considering as such those renderings of technical services of a scientific, consulting, administrative or similar nature, covering then most of intellectual services.

Dividends

Under Argentine domestic law, dividend payments are subject to a 35% withholding tax to the extent the payment exceeds the amount of accumulated tax earnings. Although it envisions reduced withholding rates in practice the treaty does not provide any relief in this regard.

Other particular features

Some other particular features the treaty provides are, among others, as follows:

  • It includes a required holding period for enjoying dividends taxation relief;

  • The amendment includes a limitation of benefits (LoB) clause. Although these LOBs may be relaxed by the relevant contracting state under certain specific facts and circumstances, they are clearly aligned with current global trends (e.g. BEPS) mainly aimed at avoiding treaty-abuse practices and double non-taxation scenarios;

  • Treaty benefits are also recognised when income is assigned to a PE located in a third country but only to the extent the taxation level in that third state is at least 60% of that that should have applied to in the residency state; and

  • Non-discrimination rules would not override domestic legislations regarding limitations for deductibility of royalty payments made to a controlling company located in the other contracting state.

However, one of the most relevant changes is to leave behind the exemption method to avoid double taxation now stating the foreign tax credit method, which has been a long-standing demand from exporter of services, although it faces the downside of now taxing Argentine dividends on the Brazilian side and any Brazilian source income obtained by Argentine residents.

This development is also an encouraging indication that the Argentine and Brazilian authorities are continuing to expand and improve their respective tax treaty networks.

Ignacio Rodríguez (ignacio.e.rodriguez@ar.pwc.com)

PwC

Tel: +54 11 4850 6714

Website: www.pwc.com/ar

more across site & shared bottom lb ros

More from across our site

Imposing the tax on virtual assets is a measure that appears to have no legal, economic or statistical basis, one expert told ITR
The EU has seemingly capitulated to the US’s ‘side-by-side’ demands. This may be a win for the US, but the uncertainty has only just begun for pillar two
The £7.4m buyout marks MHA’s latest acquisition since listing on the London Stock Exchange earlier this year
ITR’s most prolific stories of the year charted public pillar two spats, the continued fallout from the PwC Australia tax leaks scandal, and a headline tax fraud trial
The climbdowns pave the way for a side-by-side deal to be concluded this week, as per the US Treasury secretary’s expectation; in other news, Taft added a 10-partner tax team
A vote to be held in 2026 could create Hogan Lovells Cadwalader, a $3.6bn giant with 3,100 lawyers across the Americas, EMEA and Asia Pacific
Foreign companies operating in Libya face source-based taxation even without a local presence. Multinationals must understand compliance obligations, withholding risks, and treaty relief to avoid costly surprises
Hotel La Tour had argued that VAT should be recoverable as a result of proceeds being used for a taxable business activity
Tax professionals are still going to be needed, but AI will make it easier than starting from zero, EY’s global tax disputes leader Luis Coronado tells ITR
AI and assisting clients with navigating global tax reform contributed to the uptick in turnover, the firm said
Gift this article