Brazil issues withholding tax guidance on the importation of services

International Tax Review is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Garden, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2025

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Brazil issues withholding tax guidance on the importation of services

Sponsored by

sponsored-firms-pwc.png
 Some tax authorities are looking to audits as a means of replenishing depleted coffers

On March 22 2017, the Brazilian tax authorities (RFB) published Solução de Consulta No. 153/2017 (SC 153/2017).

On March 22 2017, the Brazilian tax authorities (RFB) published Solução de Consulta No. 153/2017 (SC 153/2017), dated March 2 2017, confirming that the triggering event for the specified transaction taxes on the importation of services should be considered when the income becomes economically or legally available to the foreign creditor.

Among other taxes imposed by the Brazilian legislation on the importation of services, SC 153/2017 confirms the RFB's understanding of the triggering event for income withholding tax (WHT), contribution for the intervention of economic domain (CIDE) and social contributions referred to as PIS/COFINS. As per the relevant Brazilian laws, the triggering event for each of these taxes should be the payment, credit, delivery, employment or remittance of the funds. It should be noted that as CIDE should only be calculated monthly, and therefore the triggering event is only complete on the last day of the month in which this has incurred.

In the past, there were some discussions as to whether the reference to 'credit', could be taken to mean the mere accounting 'credit' in the Brazilian entity's accounting books and whether this would be sufficient to act as the triggering event for the relevant transaction taxes. Other opinions were that the tax should only be due upon actual payment/remittance abroad, with an additional alternative being that the triggering event should be considered to be the earlier of the payment being made or the obligation to make payment arising – whichever is the earliest.

Pursuant to SC 153/2017, this issue appears to be further clarified, with the RFB confirming that the triggering event should be when the creditor recognises the right to receive the amount, and not the mere registration of an accounting credit (e.g. provision or anticipated recognition of expenses). That is, the obligation of the Brazilian importer of services to pay such taxes should only arise when the foreign entity has actually the right to charge the Brazilian company in accordance with the conditions established on the agreement signed by the parties (which should materialise – in principle – after the rendering of the services). The focus of the RFB being on the income being economically or legally available to the foreign entity and having regard to the definition provided in the Brazilian tax legislation.

Although this document does not represent legal precedent, it does provide further support and guidance for Brazilian entities in relation to how the RFB is treating such arrangements from a transactional tax perspective and the timing for recognition of such taxes.

Fernando Giacobbo (fernando.giacobbo@br.pwc.com) and Mark Conomy (conomy.mark@pwc.com)

PwC

Tel: +55 11 3674-2582 and +55 11 3674-2519

Website: www.pwc.com.br

more across site & shared bottom lb ros

More from across our site

ITR’s data has highlighted the US firm’s ambition to become America’s ‘premier’ tax player via a concerted partner recruitment strategy
Jaap Zwaan’s arrival continues a recent streak of A&M Tax investing in the region; in other news, the US and Japan struck a deal that significantly lowered tariff rates
In a world where international tax concepts rely on human activity, Leonard Wagenaar poses existential questions about the future of such ideas when AI is ever-present
France v Axa provides a practical illustration of how the burden of proof is applied in TP matters under French law, ITR also heard
In an exclusive interview with ITR, Ian Gary calls for a central public CbCR database and bemoans the US’s lack of involvement in international tax transparency
Reckitt Benckiser is to divest its Essential Home business, which includes more than 70 brands, to private equity firm Advent International
In the first of a new series of weekly opinion pieces, ITR Editor Tom Baker reflects on the OECD’s attempts to sanitise the US’s brazen pillar two negotiations
The threat of 50% tariffs on Brazilian goods coincides with new Brazilian legal powers to adopt retaliatory economic measures, local experts tell ITR
The country’s chancellor appears to have backtracked from previous pillar two scepticism; in other news, Donald Trump threatened Russia with 100% tariffs
In its latest G20 update, the OECD also revealed tense discussions with the US where the ‘significant threat’ of Section 899 was highlighted
Gift this article