Hong Kong: Shenzhen-Hong Kong Stock Connect opens

International Tax Review is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 4 Bouverie Street, London, EC4Y 8AX

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2025

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Hong Kong: Shenzhen-Hong Kong Stock Connect opens

ho-khoonming.jpg
lau.jpg

Khoonming Ho

Ayesha Macpherson Lau

The Shenzhen-Hong Kong Stock Connect cross-border share trading mechanism commenced operation on December 5 2016.

This complements the Shanghai-Hong Kong Stock Connect mechanism, in place since November 2014, and enables international investors to trade selected A-shares, listed on the Shenzhen Stock Exchange (SSE), via the Hong Kong Stock Exchange (HKSE). It also allows qualified mainland investors to trade in HKSE-listed shares via the SSE.

To facilitate cross-border investment activity, and in a similar manner to the Shanghai-Hong Kong Stock Connect, preferential Chinese tax treatments have been clarified.

On November 5 2016, the Ministry of Finance, China State Administration of Taxation (SAT) and the China Securities Regulatory Commission (CSRC) issued Circular 127. It announced temporary exemptions from Chinese income taxes (corporate and individual income tax) and value added tax (VAT) for trading gains arising to foreign investors on SSE-listed shares when transacted through the Shenzhen-Hong Kong Stock Connect.

Going in the other direction, temporary income tax and VAT exemptions were also provided for the trading gains of Chinese investors arising from HKSE-listed shares when transacted through the Shenzhen-Hong Kong Stock Connect (though the income tax exemption only extends to Chinese individuals and not Chinese corporations). Dividend income continues to be fully subject to tax, though the foreign investors can potentially access treaty relief.

The preferential tax treatments for Stock Connect trading gains sit alongside existing corporate income tax exemptions for A-share trading gains realised by foreign investors through the qualified foreign institutional investor (QFII) and renminbi QFII (RQFII) programmes. QFII and RQFII, operating more broadly than Stock Connect, also allow investment in other forms of listed investment (e.g. bonds, futures, units in Chinese mutual funds). No special VAT or income tax treatment is provided for these non A-share investments and, therefore, careful planning and the use of tax treaties, where available, are still needed.

Khoonming Ho (khoonming.ho@kpmg.com) and Ayesha Macpherson Lau (ayesha.lau@kpmg.com)

KPMG China

Tel: +86 (10) 8508 7082 and +852 2826 7165

Website: www.kpmg.com/cn

more across site & shared bottom lb ros

More from across our site

Germany has forgotten to think about digital reporting requirements, a WTS partner claimed at ITR’s Indirect Tax Forum 2025
E-invoicing is currently characterised by dynamism, with fragmentation acting as a key catalyst for increasing interoperability, says Aida Cavalera of the International Observatory on eInvoicing
Pillar two and the US tax system ‘could work in harmony’, Scott Levine tells ITR in an exclusive interview to mark his arrival at Baker McKenzie
Peter White, who has a tax debt of A$2 million, has been banned for five years from seeking registration with Australia’s Tax Practitioners Board (TPB)
Wopke Hoekstra’s comments followed US measures aimed against ‘unfair foreign taxes’; in other news, Grant Thornton and Holland & Knight made key tax partner hires
An Administrative Review Tribunal ruling last month in Australia v Alcoa represents a 'concerning trend' for the tax authority, one expert tells ITR
A recent decision underlines that Indian courts are more willing to look beyond just legal compliance and examine whether foreign investment structures have real business substance
Following his Liberal Party’s election victory, one source expects Mark Carney to follow the international consensus on pillar two, as experts assess the new administration
A German economics professor was reportedly ‘irritated’ by how the Finnish ministry of finance used his data
Countries that care about the fair taxation of tech multinationals and equitable global distribution of wealth should back the UN’s tax framework, writes economist Abdelmalek Riad
Gift this article