Hong Kong: Shenzhen-Hong Kong Stock Connect opens

International Tax Review is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Garden, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2025

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Hong Kong: Shenzhen-Hong Kong Stock Connect opens

ho-khoonming.jpg
lau.jpg

Khoonming Ho

Ayesha Macpherson Lau

The Shenzhen-Hong Kong Stock Connect cross-border share trading mechanism commenced operation on December 5 2016.

This complements the Shanghai-Hong Kong Stock Connect mechanism, in place since November 2014, and enables international investors to trade selected A-shares, listed on the Shenzhen Stock Exchange (SSE), via the Hong Kong Stock Exchange (HKSE). It also allows qualified mainland investors to trade in HKSE-listed shares via the SSE.

To facilitate cross-border investment activity, and in a similar manner to the Shanghai-Hong Kong Stock Connect, preferential Chinese tax treatments have been clarified.

On November 5 2016, the Ministry of Finance, China State Administration of Taxation (SAT) and the China Securities Regulatory Commission (CSRC) issued Circular 127. It announced temporary exemptions from Chinese income taxes (corporate and individual income tax) and value added tax (VAT) for trading gains arising to foreign investors on SSE-listed shares when transacted through the Shenzhen-Hong Kong Stock Connect.

Going in the other direction, temporary income tax and VAT exemptions were also provided for the trading gains of Chinese investors arising from HKSE-listed shares when transacted through the Shenzhen-Hong Kong Stock Connect (though the income tax exemption only extends to Chinese individuals and not Chinese corporations). Dividend income continues to be fully subject to tax, though the foreign investors can potentially access treaty relief.

The preferential tax treatments for Stock Connect trading gains sit alongside existing corporate income tax exemptions for A-share trading gains realised by foreign investors through the qualified foreign institutional investor (QFII) and renminbi QFII (RQFII) programmes. QFII and RQFII, operating more broadly than Stock Connect, also allow investment in other forms of listed investment (e.g. bonds, futures, units in Chinese mutual funds). No special VAT or income tax treatment is provided for these non A-share investments and, therefore, careful planning and the use of tax treaties, where available, are still needed.

Khoonming Ho (khoonming.ho@kpmg.com) and Ayesha Macpherson Lau (ayesha.lau@kpmg.com)

KPMG China

Tel: +86 (10) 8508 7082 and +852 2826 7165

Website: www.kpmg.com/cn

more across site & shared bottom lb ros

More from across our site

Veteran Elizabeth Arrendale will lead the new advisory practice, which will support clients with M&A tax structuring, post-deal integration, and more
MAP cases keep increasing, and cases closed aren’t keeping pace with the number started, the OECD’s Sriram Govind also told an ITR summit
Nobody likes paperwork or paying money, but the assertion that legal accreditation doesn’t offer value to firms and clients alike is false
Ryan hopes the buyout will help it expand into Asia and the Middle East; in other news, three German finance ministers have called for a suspension of pillar two
SKAT, which was represented by Pinsent Masons, had accused Sanjay Shah and other defendants of fraudulent dividend tax refund claims
TP managers must be able to explain technical issues in simple terms, ITR’s European Transfer Pricing Forum heard
Prudential had challenged HMRC over VAT group relief; in other news, Donald Trump unveiled timber and wood tariffs, and the European Commission published a ViDA implementation strategy
Australia’s CbCR rules have ‘widespread support’ and do not put American companies at a competitive disadvantage, the FACT Coalition said
Baker McKenzie advised two of the member firms involved, while several advisers provided transaction counsel to US-based Grant Thornton Advisors
Foreign remittance requirements put additional administrative burden on Indian law firms and strain their relationship with foreign associate firms, according to practitioners
Gift this article