Brazil: Withholding tax rules on license to distribute or commercialise software

International Tax Review is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Garden, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2025

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Brazil: Withholding tax rules on license to distribute or commercialise software

Sponsored by

sponsored-firms-pwc.png
Parties entering into license agreements are ultimately concerned with their own expected monetary gains from such ventures

The federal Brazilian tax authorities (RFB) published a declaratory act regarding the withholding tax on payments abroad for a license to distribute or commercialise software.

On December 26 2017, the federal Brazilian tax authorities (RFB) published Declaratory Interpretative Act 7/2017 (dated December 21 2017) concerning the application of the withholding tax on payments abroad for the right to distribute or commercialise software (ADI 7/2017).

The ADI 7/2017 provides that payments, credits or remittances to a non-resident in consideration for the right to distribute or commercialise software should be classified within the concept of royalty and be subject to income withholding tax at a rate of 15%. However, where the beneficiary of the payment is resident or domiciled in a tax haven, the rate of 25% should be applied.

The decision follows a recent trend of decisions including Solução de Divergência 18/2017 (dated March 27 2017) and Solução de Consulta 154/2016 (dated November 18 2016) which modified the RFB's previous position in relation to this issue. The ADI 7/2017 confirms that this decision modifies the conclusions of contrary positions in Soluções de Consulta/Soluções de Divergência (types of published rulings) issued before the date of publication of the ADI 7/2017.

Although not law, the ADI 7/2017 does provide clarity on how the RFB will treat such payments going forward. As such, taxpayers with transactions abroad relating to acquiring rights to distribute or commercialise software in Brazil should revisit these transactions to determine how the decision may impact their arrangements, including deductibility.

Updates to the Brazilian tax haven and privileged tax regime list

On December 26 2017, the RFB published Normative Instruction 1,773/2017 (dated December 21 2017) providing certain updates to the list of tax havens and privileged tax regimes (NI 1,773/2017).

The NI 1,773/2017 excludes Singapore, Costa Rica and Madeira Islands from the list of tax havens (referred to as the 'black list'). However, the following were included as privileged tax regimes (referred to as the 'grey list'):

  • Costa Rica – the 'Zona Franca' (free-trade zone) regime

  • Portugal – the Centro Internacional de Negocios da Madeira (Centre of International Business) regime

  • Singapore – various special regimes subject to differentiated tax rates, including related to leasing, finance and treasury, insurance, and shipping, among others.

Immaterial changes were also made to the definition of 'holding company' for the purposes of defining Danish and Dutch privileged tax regimes. There was no modification to include Austrian holding companies in the definition, which is interesting given the wording of the Austrian privileged tax regime is the same as the wording for Danish and Dutch companies.

Generally speaking, tax havens and privileged tax regimes are subject to more restrictive thin capitalisation rules, to transfer pricing analysis regardless of whether the foreign party is related to the Brazilian entity as well as various adverse consequences/restrictions under the Brazilian controlled foreign corporation (CFC) rules. Further, payments to tax havens generally trigger higher rates of withholding taxes than to other countries (both on remittances, sales and applications in Brazilian capital markets).

The effects were to take effect from January 1 2018. Although the NI 1,773/2017 is not law, it does provide clarity on how the RFB will treat such jurisdictions and regimes going forward.

Giacobbo
Conomy

Fernando

Giacobbo

Mark Conomy

Fernando Giacobbo (fernando.giacobbo@pwc.com) and Mark Conomy (conomy.mark@pwc.com), São Paulo

PwC

Website: www.pwc.com.br

more across site & shared bottom lb ros

More from across our site

While pillar one is still alive, it will apply to a smaller group of companies, Brian Foley also told ITR
Tax teams that centralise and automate their pillar two data will have a much easier time during reporting season, says Hank Moonen, CEO of TaxModel
While GCCs drive efficiency for multinationals, they also present a host of TP risks that should be considered carefully
PwC Ireland has also called for simplifying Ireland’s tax code and a reduction in its capital gains tax in a pre-budget submission
Effective audit management requires more than documentation; it’s the way taxpayers engage that can shape audit direction, manage procedural ambiguity, and preserve options for appeal or litigation
American advisers are falling short of client expectations when it comes to providing value-added services, but remaining tight-lipped won’t make the problem go away
Awards
The Social Impact Awards unveil new categories to reflect a changing legal and social landscape
Australia's approach to tax policy has undergone significant shifts in recent years, reflecting global trends and unique domestic considerations. These developments merit close attention from tax professionals
The UK has temporarily dodged the 50% rate due to a trade deal signed with the US in May; in other news, Ryan acquired a Northern Irish tax firm
Following a $28 million funding round, Aibidia wants to ‘double down’ on the US market via partnerships with the ‘big four’, the Finnish TP tech provider’s CEO tells ITR
Gift this article