Russia: Russia adopts OECD BEPS 13 rules on three-tiered approach for transfer pricing documentation

International Tax Review is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 4 Bouverie Street, London, EC4Y 8AX

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2025

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Russia: Russia adopts OECD BEPS 13 rules on three-tiered approach for transfer pricing documentation

Sponsored by

sponsored-firms-kpmg.png
intl-updates

In December 2017, Russia passed into law the three-tiered approach for transfer pricing (TP) documentation in accordance with OECD BEPS Action Plan 13.

This approach applies to multinational enterprise groups (MNE groups) with a consolidated income of or exceeding RUB 50 billion ($877 million), close to the EUR 750 million ($898.4 million) threshold in BEPS Action 13.

These requirements took effect in 2017, while new local file requirements for MNE groups apply from 2018. The following is a brief overview.

Country-by-country reporting (CbCR)

Country-by-country reporting notifications must be filed within eight months from the end of the reporting fiscal year, and must state which MNE group company is responsible for filing CbC reports. One notification suffices for all Russian group members.

The main CbC report is due within 12 months from the end of the reporting fiscal year. If the CbC report has been filed in another jurisdiction and the Russian authorities can gain a copy under the automatic exchange procedure, there is no need to resubmit the reporting in Russia.

Non-Russian parent companies can report in foreign languages and may use the currency applied in their consolidated financial statements. The tax authorities will soon issue guidance on how to properly prepare CbCR reporting.

From 2020, the authorities may penalise non-submission or submission of inaccurate information, charging RUB 50,000 for CbCR notifications and RUB 100,000 for CbCRs.

Master file

Master file requirements generally match BEPS 13, though there are additional demands such as a requirement for descriptions of all pricing agreements and tax clarifications related to the allocation of income, including bilateral advance pricing agreements (APAs).

The tax authorities may request the master file after 12 months have passed from the last day of the reporting fiscal period, and the taxpayer should provide it in Russian within three months after receiving a request. From 2020, failure to submit within these deadlines will result in a fine of RUB 100,000.

Local file

Local firms that are part of MNE groups must prepare a local file in Russian for each group of controlled transactions with non-Russian counterparties that are members of the MNE group.

The local file is similar to TP documentation prepared on the calendar basis, and should refer to the Russian tax code's requirements and local benchmarking studies, if applicable.

Local files should also include information on a taxpayer's management structure, who receives management reports, the taxpayer's main competitors, argumentation supporting that prices are at arm's length, copies of material contracts, copies of APAs, and an audit report, if available.

Local files need only be submitted if requested. Requests may be received after June 1 of the year following the reporting calendar year. An extension is available for 2018 and 2019.

Failure to submit within the deadline leads to a fine of RUB 100,000 and the application of 40% penalties.

Please note that local file requirements do not cover other controlled transactions, such as domestic ones. Existing local TP documentation requirements still apply to these.

The above changes are new challenges for multinational companies doing business in Russia. To ensure compliance, we recommend taking action now.

lemetyuynen.jpg
iyudin.jpg

Ilarion

Lemetyuynen

Alexander

Iyudin

Ilarion Lemetyuynen (ilemetyuynen@kpmg.ru) and Alexander Iyudin (aiyudin@kpmg.ru)

KPMG in Russia and the CIS

Tel: +7 (495) 937 44 44

Website: www.kpmg.ru

more across site & shared bottom lb ros

More from across our site

Germany has forgotten to think about digital reporting requirements, a WTS partner claimed at ITR’s Indirect Tax Forum 2025
E-invoicing is currently characterised by dynamism, with fragmentation acting as a key catalyst for increasing interoperability, says Aida Cavalera of the International Observatory on eInvoicing
Pillar two and the US tax system ‘could work in harmony’, Scott Levine tells ITR in an exclusive interview to mark his arrival at Baker McKenzie
Peter White, who has a tax debt of A$2 million, has been banned for five years from seeking registration with Australia’s Tax Practitioners Board (TPB)
Wopke Hoekstra’s comments followed US measures aimed against ‘unfair foreign taxes’; in other news, Grant Thornton and Holland & Knight made key tax partner hires
An Administrative Review Tribunal ruling last month in Australia v Alcoa represents a 'concerning trend' for the tax authority, one expert tells ITR
A recent decision underlines that Indian courts are more willing to look beyond just legal compliance and examine whether foreign investment structures have real business substance
Following his Liberal Party’s election victory, one source expects Mark Carney to follow the international consensus on pillar two, as experts assess the new administration
A German economics professor was reportedly ‘irritated’ by how the Finnish ministry of finance used his data
Countries that care about the fair taxation of tech multinationals and equitable global distribution of wealth should back the UN’s tax framework, writes economist Abdelmalek Riad
Gift this article