Craving a bit of substance

International Tax Review is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Garden, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2025

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Craving a bit of substance

I've never been one for fine dining. Don't get me wrong, I love flavour, freshness and fancy food, but to be honest I find myself in the same boat as the tax authorities. Something can be intricately and expensively assembled and put in front of me ever so politely, but what I really crave at the end of the day is substance.

This year is shaping up to be one of the busiest yet for the tax profession – as ITR warned in its February issue. One of the areas where this is being experienced most is tax planning.

The phrase 'tax planning' has, during the past few years, started to carry some negative connotations. For some members of the public, and many tax justice campaigners, 'tax planning' has become a euphemism for aggressive tax avoidance.

At ITR, we like to treat words as words – and this year, planning your taxes is as important as ever. Countries are preparing for BEPS in earnest, bringing in reams of legislation, as evidenced by many of this month's International Updates, mentioning the BEPS project. A big theme of this kind of legislation, and the way tax authorities are now examining companies' tax affairs, is the principle of substance over form.

And US tax reform, of course, means that many tax structures will require tweaking or overhauling as companies seek to find the best position to deal with two of the major talking points within it: the base erosion anti-avoidance tax and the global intangible low-taxed income provisions.

So as you dash between the Tax Planning Survey's rankings tables like the poor overworked waiter on our front cover, do pay attention to the words in between, where ITR's editorial staff have dissected many of the issues professionals should be planning for.

But that's not all we have in this month's magazine. Before you reach for pièce de résistance, we have a wide selection of entrées. There's news analysis, Keith Brockman's regular column, an exploration of anti-profiteering regulations and not one but two features on digital taxation issues.

And, once you've digested the main course of the cover story, there is a trio of delectable European desserts: Special features from Germany and Malta, and a report of our successful Indirect Tax Forum, which was held in Amsterdam in March with speakers from the OECD and European Commission, among others.

Bon appétit!

Joe Stanley-Smith

Editor, International Tax Review
joseph.stanley-smith@euromoneyplc.com

more across site & shared bottom lb ros

More from across our site

Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney and US President Donald Trump have agreed that the countries will look to conclude a deal by July 21, 2025
The firm’s lack of transparency regarding its tax leaks scandal should see the ban extended beyond June 30, senators Deborah O’Neill and Barbara Pocock tell ITR
Despite posing significant administrative hurdles, digital services taxes remain ‘the best way forward’ for emerging economies, says Neil Kelley, COO of Ascoria
A ‘joint understanding’ among G7 countries that ‘defends American interests’ is set to be announced, Scott Bessent claimed
The ‘big four’ firm’s inaugural annual report unveiled a sharp drop in profits for 2024; in other news, Baker McKenzie and Perkins Coie expanded their US tax benches
Representatives from the two countries focused on TP as they met this week to evaluate progress under a previously signed agreement – it is understood
The UK accountancy firm’s transfer pricing lead tells ITR about his expat lifestyle, taking risks, and what makes tax cool
Dolphin Drilling intends to discuss the final liability amount and manner of settlement with HM Revenue and Customs
Winning the case against the 20% VAT imposition was always going to be an uphill challenge for the claimants, UK tax advisers argue
A ‘paradigm shift’ in Chile’s tax enforcement requires compliance architecture built on proactive governance, strategic documentation and active monitoring of judicial developments
Gift this article