Bosnia and Herzegovina: Amendments to the Law on Excise Duties in Bosnia and Herzegovina

International Tax Review is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Garden, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2025

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Bosnia and Herzegovina: Amendments to the Law on Excise Duties in Bosnia and Herzegovina

intl-updates

On December 15 2017, the Parliament adopted long-delayed amendments to the Excise Law in Bosnia and Herzegovina (BiH) following a 15-hour-long debate in Parliament and resistance from the major opposition parties. The amendments entered into force on January 3 2018 and became applicable as of February 1 2018.

The opposition parties expressed their dissatisfaction with the non-existence of a protective mechanism for businessmen, the inadequate explanation of reasons and the lack of any kind of analysis. Furthermore, in their opinion, the legislative changes will lead to higher costs of products and services in the country.

On the other side, the supporters of the amendments pointed out that the International Monetary Fund (IMF) would not release funds (in the amount of around €550 million ($676 million)) to BiH until the country's Parliament adopted a new law on excise taxes.

Additionally, the Law would unblock €220 million from the European Bank for Reconstruction and Development (EBRD) for infrastructure projects in BiH, as well as another €250 million of loans from the EBRD.

The main law changes relate to widening the tax base on bio-fuels and LPG, increasing the excise duty for heating oil as well as for oil derivatives and LPG. Accordingly, excise duties are shown in Table 1.

Table 1

Fuel type

Fuel amount

Tax amount (BAM)

Tax amount (€)

Gas oil/bio-fuels

1,000 litres

700

358

Unleaded petrol

1,000 litres

750

383

Heating oil

1,000 litres

450

230

LPG

1,000 kg

400

205


Furthermore, the road tolls have been increased by BAM 0.15 ($0.09) per litre of fuel, in order to satisfy international creditors who consider increased road tolls as a safeguard for repayment of debts.

Future analysis will show the effect on the economy of the increasing of fuel prices, on the one hand, and the funds for the reconstruction and development on the other. Companies dealing with bio-fuels, LPG, oils and oil derivatives are advised to seek assistance in assessing the impact of the amendments, on their businesses.

topic.jpg

Dajana Topic (dajana.topic@eurofast.eu), Banja Luka/Sarajevo

Eurofast Global

Tel: +387 51 961 610

Website: www.eurofast.eu

more across site & shared bottom lb ros

More from across our site

ITR’s data has highlighted the US firm’s ambition to become America’s ‘premier’ tax player via a concerted partner recruitment strategy
Jaap Zwaan’s arrival continues a recent streak of A&M Tax investing in the region; in other news, the US and Japan struck a deal that significantly lowered tariff rates
In a world where international tax concepts rely on human activity, Leonard Wagenaar poses existential questions about the future of such ideas when AI is ever-present
France v Axa provides a practical illustration of how the burden of proof is applied in TP matters under French law, ITR also heard
In an exclusive interview with ITR, Ian Gary calls for a central public CbCR database and bemoans the US’s lack of involvement in international tax transparency
Reckitt Benckiser is to divest its Essential Home business, which includes more than 70 brands, to private equity firm Advent International
In the first of a new series of weekly opinion pieces, ITR Editor Tom Baker reflects on the OECD’s attempts to sanitise the US’s brazen pillar two negotiations
The threat of 50% tariffs on Brazilian goods coincides with new Brazilian legal powers to adopt retaliatory economic measures, local experts tell ITR
The country’s chancellor appears to have backtracked from previous pillar two scepticism; in other news, Donald Trump threatened Russia with 100% tariffs
In its latest G20 update, the OECD also revealed tense discussions with the US where the ‘significant threat’ of Section 899 was highlighted
Gift this article