Serbia narrows down list of services subject to withholding tax

International Tax Review is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Garden, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2025

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Serbia narrows down list of services subject to withholding tax

intl-updates-small.jpg

Important changes affecting a wide range of companies in Serbia have been introduced via amendments to the provision related to the application of withholding tax. Article 40, paragraph 1, item 5 of the Law on Corporate Profit Tax regulates the taxation of services provided by foreign entities by subjecting them to withholding tax. It will apply as of April 1 2018.

The long-awaited definition of services that are subject to withholding tax has finally been put in place. This has been an area of great uncertainty among companies who were often unsure about whether or not to pay withholding tax for services received from abroad.

The new Article 40, paragraph 1, item 5 of the Law defines that the subject of taxation as regards withholding tax is the income of foreign legal entities received from domestic (Serbian) legal entities for:

  • Market research services;

  • Accounting and auditing services; and

  • Other services in the field of legal and business consulting, regardless of the place where the services are provided or used, or where they will be provided or used.

It was proposed that the Minister of Finance define in even greater detail the types of services in order to eliminate any doubt as to the application of the regulations.

As a result of the amendment, starting from April 1 2018, domestic legal entities will not have to calculate and pay withholding tax for services, such as advertising services on Facebook, Google and AdWords, and goods transportation services through the territory of Serbia, etc. There will no longer be a requirement to obtain a tax residence certificate for the purpose of applying bilateral tax treaties on the avoidance of double taxation. The obligation remains solely in respect of tax-subject services: market research, accounting and auditing services and other services in the field of legal and business consulting.

This change applies to all payments made by domestic legal entities to foreign legal entities starting from April 1 2018, regardless of whether the service for which the fee is paid was supplied before or after that date. With this in mind, companies should not rush to pay for already performed services, if and when possible, but should consider postponing the payments until after April 1 2018 if the nature of the supply is exempt from withholding tax under the new rule.

radulovic.jpg

Zvezdana Radulovic

Zvezdana Radulovic (zvezdana.radulovic@eurofast.eu)

Eurofast Global

Tel: +381 11 324 14 84

Website: www.eurofast.eu

more across site & shared bottom lb ros

More from across our site

Given the US/G7 pillar two deal, the OECD is in danger of being replaced by the UN as the leading global tax reform forum
Cinven’s latest investment follows its acquisition of a stake in Grant Thornton UK in December; in other news, a barrister listed by HMRC as a tax avoidance promoter has alleged harassment
CIT base narrowing measures remain more prevalent than increased CIT rates, the report also highlighted
ITR's parent company, LBG, will acquire The Lawyer, a leading news, intelligence and data-driven insight provider for the legal industry, from Centaur Media
KPMG UK’s Graeme Webster and KPMG Meijburg & Co’s Eduard Sporken outline the 20-year evolution of MAPAs, with DEMPE analyses becoming more prevalent and MAPA requirements growing stricter
Rishi Joshi, of the Institute of Chartered Accountants of India, warns of potential judicial overreach as assets are recharacterised to bypass a legislative exclusion
Only 2% of in-house survey respondents said they were ‘heavy’ users of AI for TP, Aibidia’s report also found
There was a ‘deeply embedded culture within PwC that routinely disregarded formal confidentiality obligations,’ the chairman of Australia’s Tax Practitioners Board said
Jennifer Best was most recently the acting commissioner of the IRS’s large business and international division
Section 899’s exclusion from the One Big Beautiful Bill does not mean it has been nipped in the bud, Aruna Kalyanam also tells ITR
Gift this article