Poland: Income tax on buildings: Amendments

International Tax Review is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Garden, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2026

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Poland: Income tax on buildings: Amendments

Sponsored by

sponsored-firms-mddp.png
intl-updates-small.jpg

The new rules concerning income tax on building regulations will enter into force on January 1 2019, with some relating to 2018.

The main amendment is that income tax on buildings will apply to all buildings owned (wholly or partially) for rent or other forms of payable use, excluding only residential properties included in governmental or local social housing programmes. The tax will continue to apply to all buildings that are fixed assets regardless of statistical classification, including warehouses, production facilities, offices and shopping centres. Income tax on buildings will be due if the rented area exceeds 5% of a building's total usage area. The tax does not apply to buildings used mainly for an entity's own needs.

The tax base will be the sum of initial tax values of buildings less than PLN 10 million ($2.7 million). The tax will apply to all buildings belonging to a given taxpayer, regardless of quantity and value (in 2018 a PLN 10 million tax allowance applied to each individual building). Regarding related parties, the PLN 10 million is divided proportionally according to the income from a given taxpayer's buildings to the income of the group.

In situations when the amount of corporate income tax is lower than tax on buildings or a taxpayer declares a tax loss, the income tax on buildings will be refunded if the tax authorities conclude that there were no irregularities in the settlement of this tax and the correct settlement of income tax (especially relating to debt financing costs) was made. The refund is made on the request of the taxpayer only. This provision has been introduced with retrospective effect from January 1 2018.

The new regulations introduce the targeted anti-avoidance rule (TAAR), whereby the tax is also applicable if the taxpayer transfers ownership of the building or provides it for use under a leasing contract to avoid income tax on buildings (unless doing so is justified for economic reasons).

Neither the 0.42% per annum tax rate nor the right to deduct income tax on buildings from monthly income tax advances were changed.

more across site & shared bottom lb ros

More from across our site

HMRC’s growing focus on evidencing tax decisions is shifting attention from technical accuracy to governance, requiring businesses to demonstrate how positions were reached and documented
Australia’s Department of Finance will also commission an independent review of KPMG’s governance, culture, ethics and integrity frameworks, it has revealed.
In the second instalment of this two-part series, Jayne Stokes takes a practical approach to navigating the capital v revenue question for UK R&D claims for software development, and shares pointers for businesses
ITR's latest podcast considers how transformational the buyout could be in Ryan's quest for global advisory reach and analyses a recent boom in demand for private client advisory services
The event comes at an important moment for professionals dealing with practical realities related to this practice area
Germany’s dogmatic restriction of third-party investment in tax advisory firms will only serve to slow down innovation and access to justice
The Irish government has been told that it’s spending too much of its corporation tax receipts and should instead focus on running bigger surpluses; plus, the IRS is set to merge tax practitioner offices
A company risks double taxation, penalties and inquiry cost if it submits a form with anomalies under the new system, Asker Ali also tells ITR
Arindam Mitra and Robin Hart examine how aggregate TP rules clash with transaction-level customs rules, creating compliance risks and requiring granular, SKU-level pricing strategies
The scandal has come just three years after the PwC tax leaks controversy and has prompted KPMG’s Australian chief executive to resign
Gift this article