Brazilian Federal Government questionably reduces REINTEGRA tax benefit for exporters

International Tax Review is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Garden, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2026

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Brazilian Federal Government questionably reduces REINTEGRA tax benefit for exporters

export containers

The Brazilian Federal Government has determined, effective immediately, that the rates for calculating REINTEGRA deemed credits must be reduced from 2% to 0.1%, without respecting the grace period for the rule to become effective.

The Special Regime for Reintegrating Tax Values for Exporting Companies (REINTEGRA, acronym for Regime especial de reintegração de valores tributários para empresas exportadoras), reinstituted by Law 13043/2014, is a tax benefit aimed at promoting exports of goods manufactured in Brazil (listed in Decree 8415/2015), by granting exporters the right to calculate the Social Contributions on Gross Revenues (PIS and COFINS) deemed credits based on export revenues.

This REINTEGRA tax benefit has been a great advantage for exporters, especially because the deemed credits may be used for offsetting against federal taxes due by the exporter or reimbursed in cash, and the amounts received as credits are not subject to Corporate Income Tax (IRPJ), Social Contribution on Net Profits (CSLL), and PIS and COFINS.

The deemed credits are calculated by applying a rate from 0.1% to 3% – to be determined by the Executive Branch – on each company’s export revenues. In this context, Decree 8415/2015 established that the applicable rate for this tax benefit in the period between January 1, 2017, and December 31, 2018, would be 2%.

However, on May 30, 2018, Decree 9393/2018 was published by the Federal Government, reducing, as of June 1, 2018, the rate from 2% to 0.1%.

The rate reduction carried out with immediate effect is unconstitutional, as it instantly increases the PIS and COFINS tax burden. This is because the Brazilian Federal Constitution establishes that increases in social contributions, such as the PIS and COFINS, can only produce effects after a 90-day grace period for the rule to become effective known as tax anteriority.

Tax anteriority, in our opinion, applies not only to tax rate increases but also to any tax burden increase, direct or indirect. To this effect, a reduction of a tax benefit equates to an indirect tax burden increase that should be subject to the tax anteriority.

There are precedents of the Brazilian Federal Supreme Court regarding past reductions of the REINTEGRA, in which the immediate reduction of the deemed credits rate, which could only be applied after the 90-day grace period, was deemed unconstitutional.

In this context, there are strong legal grounds to challenge the immediate effects of Decree 9393/2018, postponing it for 90 days, assuring the applicability of the 2% rate for the tax benefit during this period. Brazilian taxpayers are already challenging this matter, and have been obtaining favourable preliminary injunctions at the federal courts.

The Brazilian Federal Constitution establishes certain principles that exist to protect companies and individuals, such as tax anteriority and legal security. The constitutional rules cannot be simply disregarded by the government, under penalty of increasing even more the tax litigation in Brazil.

Ricardo M. Debatin da Silveira (rsilveira@machadoassociados.com.br) and Gabriel Caldiron Rezende (grezende@machadoassociados.com.br) are members of Machado Associados’ indirect tax team.

more across site & shared bottom lb ros

More from across our site

The Office for Budget Responsibility’s pessimistic pillar two forecast accompanied the UK chancellor’s muted Spring Statement, dubbed ‘as dull as possible’ by one adviser
Digital tax reform is dissolving the old ‘temporal buffer’, forcing systems, institutions, and professionals to adapt as real-time reporting reshapes governance, capability, and compliance
Our first instalment features analysis of Deloitte’s landmark EMEA merger, Donald Trump’s Supreme Court tariff showdown and Venezuela’s tax evolution
While some believe it could have a positive effect on the wider advisory landscape, others argue that HMRC’s ‘red tape’ exercise won’t deter bad actors
The political optics of the US’s carve-out deal are poor, but as the Fair Tax Foundation’s Paul Monaghan writes, it preserves pillar two’s guiding ethos
The big four firm reportedly sent ‘threatening’ correspondence to Unity Advisory over its hiring of ex-PwC partners; plus tax recruitment news from the week
Tom Goldstein, who was represented by US law firm Munger, Tolles & Olson, denied wilfully cheating on his taxes and blamed errors on his staff
Multinationals face rising TP scrutiny as global rules diverge. As Daniel Moalusi argues, strong, consistent documentation is now essential to minimise audit risk and protect tax positions
The profession is fundamentally restructuring itself around what tax and accounting work should be, a Thomson Reuters leader told ITR
The big four firm is consolidating 16 entities across the region to create a single 6,000-partner behemoth
Gift this article